On Jan 16, 2008 1:58 AM, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> > when i said a function would have to be loaded into the interpreter to
> > avoid a runtime error
> > upon invocation, i didnt mention that its best to programatically verify
>
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> when i said a function would have to be loaded into the interpreter to
> avoid a runtime error
> upon invocation, i didnt mention that its best to programatically verify it
> can be called before
> letting the runtime error occur (of course you can
On Jan 15, 2008 7:31 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when i said a function would have to be loaded into the interpreter to
> avoid a runtime error
> upon invocation, i didnt mention that its best to programatically verify
> it can be called before
> letting the runtime error occur (
On Jan 15, 2008 6:51 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe schreef:
> > when it comes to create_function(), id say its just as painful as
> building
> > functions with html or writing queries by hand. namely, its prone to a
> lot
> > of string escaping which produces awful har
Nathan Nobbe schreef:
when it comes to create_function(), id say its just as painful as building
functions with html or writing queries by hand. namely, its prone to a lot
of string escaping which produces awful hard to read code. i mean, the
kind of code you write yourself and then look at a w
when it comes to create_function(), id say its just as painful as building
functions with html or writing queries by hand. namely, its prone to a lot
of string escaping which produces awful hard to read code. i mean, the
kind of code you write yourself and then look at a week later and say
'what
On Mon, January 14, 2008 8:13 pm, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Richard Lynch wrote:
>> If you want something that esoteric, go use Lisp. :-)
>
> You are aware that of the "modern" web languages (PHP, Javascript,
> Python,
> Ruby, etc.) PHP is the only one that doesn't have at
On Monday 14 January 2008, Richard Lynch wrote:
> And, actually, the implementation that seemed to get the most
> approbation was a simple way to create a function as a kind of a
> resource (like a MySQL connection resource) and then you could pass it
> around and use it.
>
> It still didn't have
On Thu, January 10, 2008 4:22 am, John Papas wrote:
> Is there any functionality in PHP similar to closures?
Sort of.
There is a create_function:
http://php.net/create_function
> Are there any plans to add it..?
There was discussion on the php-internals list last week about
replacing create_fun
John Papas schreef:
> Is there any functionality in PHP similar to closures?
>
> Are there any plans to add it..?
read the archives of the php internals or all posts pertaining to closures,
that will answer all your questions.
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe
10 matches
Mail list logo
