Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote Justin Patrin:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:04:11 +0200, Daniel Schierbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Note: Parent constructors are not called implicitly. In order
to run a parent constructor, a call to parent::__construct() is
required.
Is this a
* Thus wrote Justin Patrin:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:04:11 +0200, Daniel Schierbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Note: Parent constructors are not called implicitly. In order
> > to run a parent constructor, a call to parent::__construct() is
> > require
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:04:11 +0200, Daniel Schierbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello there. I was experimenting a bit with the constructors and
> destructors, and found that this code:
>
>
> class First
> {
> public function __construct ()
>
3 matches
Mail list logo