tedd wrote:
> At 9:06 AM -0400 4/16/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>
>> It runs in a terminal!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rob.
>
> That's not good. Airport security frowns on that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> tedd
>
Mac users might get a little upset if Airport security doesn't allow them to use
their terminals to run
At 9:06 AM -0400 4/16/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
It runs in a terminal!
Cheers,
Rob.
That's not good. Airport security frowns on that.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubsc
Jan G.B. wrote:
2010/4/16 Adam Richardson :
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:55 AM, tedd wrote:
At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like phpEdit
is that it has a terrific code beautifier.
2010/4/16 Adam Richardson :
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Jason Pruim
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:55 AM, tedd wrote:
>>
>> At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
>>>
Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like phpEdit
is that it has a terrific code bea
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:55 AM, tedd wrote:
>
> At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
>>
>>> Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like phpEdit
>>> is that it has a terrific code beautifier. You can set it for phpDoc or
>>
On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 08:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
Have you tried Coder on the Mac? Most developers I know who use Macs
(it's not the oxymoron it sounds! :p )
Most Mac people would say the morons use Windows ;) But that's
another story f
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:55 AM, tedd wrote:
At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like
phpEdit is that it has a terrific code beautifier. You can set it
for phpDoc or Pear rendering. And, it auto indents, etc. as you
enter stuff.
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 08:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
> >Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like
> >phpEdit is that it has a terrific code beautifier. You can set it
> >for phpDoc or Pear rendering. And, it auto indents, etc. as you
> >e
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:55 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
>>
>> Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like phpEdit
>> is that it has a terrific code beautifier. You can set it for phpDoc or
>> Pear rendering. And, it auto indents, etc. as you enter
At 4:13 PM -0400 4/14/10, Al wrote:
Incidentally, about formatting scripts, one of the reasons I like
phpEdit is that it has a terrific code beautifier. You can set it
for phpDoc or Pear rendering. And, it auto indents, etc. as you
enter stuff.
Al...
Unfortunately, there is no phpE
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:06:39PM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:52 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
>
> I've never had other coders looking over my shoulder, and I agonized for
> years over whether my logical solutions were the "best"
> approach. Now I
>
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:52 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:28:13PM -0400, tedd wrote:
>
> > At 5:06 PM -0400 4/13/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> Nathan Rixham wrote:
> >>>
> >>> well that's one job I'm not getting :p
> >>
> >> Well you DID get 66.7%. I've met "coders" t
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:28:13PM -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 5:06 PM -0400 4/13/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>>
>>> well that's one job I'm not getting :p
>>
>> Well you DID get 66.7%. I've met "coders" that would stare at the
>> answer and still not understand :D
>>
>> Cheers
On 4/14/2010 12:28 PM, tedd wrote:
At 5:06 PM -0400 4/13/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well that's one job I'm not getting :p
Well you DID get 66.7%. I've met "coders" that would stare at the
answer and still not understand :D
Cheers,
Rob.
Well.. count me among those s
At 12:32 PM -0400 4/14/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:
My "logic" works the other way -- when presented with a logic
problem, I come up with a solution that works the way I think and I
always to solve the problem presented. Perhaps my solution isn't as
clever nor as cryptic as others, b
tedd wrote:
At 5:06 PM -0400 4/13/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well that's one job I'm not getting :p
Well you DID get 66.7%. I've met "coders" that would stare at the
answer and still not understand :D
Cheers,
Rob.
Well.. count me among those staring. I just don't get t
At 5:06 PM -0400 4/13/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
well that's one job I'm not getting :p
Well you DID get 66.7%. I've met "coders" that would stare at the
answer and still not understand :D
Cheers,
Rob.
Well.. count me among those staring. I just don't get those type
At 10:04 PM +0100 4/13/10, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Fail on that last one. -1 is not equivalent to FALSE :B
well that's one job I'm not getting :p
cheers for the picking that one up Rob
And that's the reason why I hate test like that!
The short
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming
function check_it2($val) {
echo
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming
function check_it2($val) {
echo gettype($val);
switch($val) {
case($val > 0 ):
echo "Switch
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
> steve_r wrote:
>> I'm new to programming
>>
>> function check_it2($val) {
>> echo gettype($val);
>> switch($val) {
>> case($val
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night
courses
to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a
dumb
question, I don't have much experience.
Robert Cummings wrote:
> Nathan Rixham wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night
courses
to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a
dumb
question, I don't have much experi
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night
courses
to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a dumb
question, I don't have much experience.
I'm taking a night class in HTML and PHP and c
Robert Cummings wrote:
> steve_r wrote:
>> I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night
>> courses
>> to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a dumb
>> question, I don't have much experience.
>>
>> I'm taking a night class in HTML and PHP and can't f
At 12:04 PM -0400 4/13/10, steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night courses
to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a dumb
question, I don't have much experience.
-snip-
Sorry for the basic question.
Steve Reilly
Steve:
Pl
Okay, I understand now, true/false is better, now it makes sense why it's
always hitting the case it hits. Thank you Ashley.
steve_r wrote:
I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night courses
to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a dumb
question, I don't have much experience.
I'm taking a night class in HTML and PHP and can't figure out a problem and
can't find the a
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 12:04 -0400, steve_r wrote:
> I'm new to programming, drive a truck in the day, now taking night courses
> to get a better job for my family. Please bear with me if this is a dumb
> question, I don't have much experience.
>
> I'm taking a night class in HTML and PHP and can
29 matches
Mail list logo
