Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
> Less manegeable becouse I would have to keep copies of the pictures on
> the disk. If I ever want to change these watermarks, I would have to
> somehow recreate them. It is more work to do than if I used the
> per-request runtime applying of watermark approach, sin
@Per Jessen
Disk-space is cheap, especially if you don't need to be worried about
backup etc. I'm not sure why you think applying watermarks in an
off-line process would any less manageable than doing it on-line.
Well, the processing will be "online" in the sense that it will be triggered
via an
Bernhard Kohl wrote:
> I think it also depends on the size of your images. If they are huge
> megapixel files processing them on the fly might cause severe lag.
> Still adding a watermark to an image with 100-200 thousand pixels is
> done within milliseconds on a modern machine.
>
(You probably
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My next project will be a kind of online photo viewer. All of these photos
> will need to have watermark applied to them. The problem is that, depending
> on the picture, different watermarks need to b
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
> My next project will be a kind of online photo viewer. All of these
> photos will need to have watermark applied to them. The problem is
> that, depending on the picture, different watermarks need to be
> applied. The easiest solution would be to process these pict
5 matches
Mail list logo
