Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 15:31, 9el wrote:
I'm trying to find whoami here :D
You mean to say:
"I'm trying to find whyami here."
I think I am here therefore I why?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.p
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM, 9el wrote:
> ---
> Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
> a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
> www.ubuntu.com
>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 15:31, 9el wrote:
>
> I'm trying to find whoami here :D
You mean to say:
"I'm trying to find whyami here."
;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at PilotPi
---
Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com
--
On
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:00:16PM -0300, Eduardo wrote:
> Potatoes: The Instant Recipe
> RE: Robert Cummings
>
>
> Put a washed non peeled medium size potato per person over a oven-plate and
> take it to the oven.
>
> When almost done, slice longitudinally and add a piece of hard cheese.
>
>
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>>
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>
>> Whatever you do, please, please, please, f
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 08:21 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 19:54 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:21 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:14 -0500, PJ wrote:
> > > > Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 19:54 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:21 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:14 -0500, PJ wrote:
> > > Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, 2009-03-0
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 22:46, VamVan wrote:
> >
> > Hey Guys I have Question. I just noticed that once the whoami thread
> > reached 100 posts it automatically created another thread. Is this
> intended?
> >
> > Can a discussion be only 100
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 22:46, VamVan wrote:
>
> Hey Guys I have Question. I just noticed that once the whoami thread
> reached 100 posts it automatically created another thread. Is this intended?
>
> Can a discussion be only 100 post's long??
>
> Just out of curiosity :)
In Gmail, yes. That
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 20:28, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >
> > Well, the ground beef is actually tartar and it goes without saying that
> > it would be topped with foie gras and grape chutney with caviar on the
> side.
>
> with gold-pla
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 20:28, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
> Well, the ground beef is actually tartar and it goes without saying that
> it would be topped with foie gras and grape chutney with caviar on the side.
with gold-plated platinum flakes and diamond-dust salt.
--
daniel.br...@paras
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Iris
PJ wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>>
Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
>>> Potatoes
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
>>> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
>>>
>> Potatoes are best served slic
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:21 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:14 -0500, PJ wrote:
> > Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:55 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Whilst we
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
>> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
>
> Potatoes are best served sliced into sticks, pan-fried, covered in
> cheese cu
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:40 -0500, PJ wrote:
>
>> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:16:40PM -0500, PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>
>> Dani
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:55 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>>> Whilst we're on the subject, what about cows, pigs and sheep, which are
>>> the biggest contributors to global warming through their, erm,
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:14 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:55 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Whilst we're on the subject, what about cows, pigs and sheep, which are
> >>> the
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:16 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:40 -0500, PJ wrote:
> >
> >> Paul M Foster wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:16:40PM -0500, PJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:02 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:40 -0500, PJ wrote:
> > Yuck. But then there are people who are more resistant to crap than
> > cockroaches. But we will not outlast them!
> > You might try to get informed...
> > Unfortunately, Americans are a sad
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:40 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:16:40PM -0500, PJ wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >>
> >>> PJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:46 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:55 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> > Whilst we're on the subject, what about cows, pigs and sheep, which are
> > the biggest contributors to global warming through their, erm, gases?
> > Global warming is a hug
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:43 -0500, PJ wrote:
>
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>>
>>>
Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
holy, please, do not vilify pota
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:55 +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> Whilst we're on the subject, what about cows, pigs and sheep, which are
> the biggest contributors to global warming through their, erm, gases?
> Global warming is a huge problem, so I call upon all vegetarians to eat
> as much meat as p
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:43 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >
> >> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
> >> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
> >>
> >
> > Potat
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
>> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
>>
>
> Potatoes are best served sliced into sticks, pan-fried, covered in
Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:16:40PM -0500, PJ wrote:
>
>
>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Ooooh, boy now this is
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>>
PJ wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>>
>
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
> Whatever you do, please, please, please, for the love of all that is
> holy, please, do not vilify potatoes! ...or the Irish :-)
Potatoes are best served sliced into sticks, pan-fried, covered in
cheese curds, and then finally doused in
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>
>
>
>> Right on. Good comments.
>> No offense taken and
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:16 -0500, PJ wrote:
>
>> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>
>
>
>> Right on. Good c
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:16:40PM -0500, PJ wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Brown wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
> >>>
> Ooooh, boy now this is really serious... >:o
> I think your ignorance will be forgiven, maybe! And this is not m
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:48 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> PJ wrote:
> > Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> >> PJ wrote:
> >>
> >>> Daniel Brown wrote:
> >>>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>
>
> > Right on. Good comments.
> > No offense taken and none inte
PJ wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
> Right on. Good comments.
> No offense taken and none intended.
> I am enoying the list and will continue to participate, if i may.
>
for FILE in $LIST
do
cp $FILE $FILE.bak
done
which works as long as you can guarantee that none your file names
contain spaces ... ;)
Which he already said:
Note that in both of these examples, filenames with spaces in them will
blow the whole thing up :(
;)
--
Postgresql & php
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:16 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Brown wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Right on. Good comments.
> No offense taken and none intended.
> I am enoying the list
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>>>
>>>
Right on. Good comments.
No offense taken and none intended.
I am enoying the list and will continue to participate, if i may.
I have learned a g
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:07, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
> Yeah, been crazily busy with both my regular job and freelance stuff. I
> think I'm booked up to Armageddon now :-/
Good for you. It means you're definitely doing something right.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
ht
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:02 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:03, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:23 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >> Secondly, if you are getting a different response from Google,
> >> Sally, then you didn't use the same input
> >
> > I'd
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:03, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:23 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> Secondly, if you are getting a different response from Google,
>> Sally, then you didn't use the same input
>
> I'd beg to differ. It's well known that Google gives out different
> resu
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:23 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> Secondly, if you are getting a different response from Google,
> Sally, then you didn't use the same input
I'd beg to differ. It's well known that Google gives out different
results based on geographical location and previous search history
Thodoris wrote:
Didn't have the time to read the whole thread. Sorry for being so lame.
Obviously, or you would have known that this thread has very little if
anything to do with whoami! :-)
Indeed nonetheless it will be something useful for the archives (at
least I think that).
2009/3/4 PJ
> Stuart wrote:
> > Cracking response Dan, and I agree fully with most of it. A while back
> > I was a far more active contributor to the PHP lists than I am now
> > (promotion == more responsibility == less spare time) and the reason I
> > do it is because it never seems like work -
Thodoris wrote:
> Didn't have the time to read the whole thread. Sorry for being so lame.
Obviously, or you would have known that this thread has very little if
anything to do with whoami! :-)
--
Thanks!
-Shawn
http://www.spidean.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubs
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 13:31, PJ wrote:
> am I vindicated ;-)
Eh.
Whether or not it is true in practice, in theory it certainly
sounds plausible to have varying results. However, your argument,
verbatim, wasn't entirely with merit. ;-P
All in all, sure. At the least, it shows th
PJ wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>>
>>> Right on. Good comments.
>>> No offense taken and none intended.
>>> I am enoying the list and will continue to participate, if i may.
>>> I have learned a great deal already and really do appreciate the help.
>>
Stuart wrote:
> Cracking response Dan, and I agree fully with most of it. A while back
> I was a far more active contributor to the PHP lists than I am now
> (promotion == more responsibility == less spare time) and the reason I
> do it is because it never seems like work - it's fun!!
>
> But I fee
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
>
>> Right on. Good comments.
>> No offense taken and none intended.
>> I am enoying the list and will continue to participate, if i may.
>> I have learned a great deal already and really do appreciate the help.
>>
>
> So y
This really needs some explanation
I found this on the web:
with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes matters"
(WHY ?)
and it works
But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANUAL***_ * - exec()* executes the given
/command/ ) does not,
COPIED AND PASTED:
| |
What is going on he
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:28, Stuart wrote:
>
> As I understand it, and like you I certainly don't claim to know for sure,
> clusters within the Google infrastructure sometimes fall behind with their
> copy of the the index which can mean different results even between page
> reloads. Never seen t
2009/3/4 Daniel Brown
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:31, Stuart wrote:
> >
> > The results returned by Google are not constant. They vary based on your
> > location, which domain you're using, which index instance you hit and a
> > number of other things, most of which are not public. It is more th
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:31, Stuart wrote:
>
> The results returned by Google are not constant. They vary based on your
> location, which domain you're using, which index instance you hit and a
> number of other things, most of which are not public. It is more than
> possible that PJ did get diff
Cracking response Dan, and I agree fully with most of it. A while back I was
a far more active contributor to the PHP lists than I am now (promotion ==
more responsibility == less spare time) and the reason I do it is because it
never seems like work - it's fun!!
But I feel I must correct you on o
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:20, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
>
> I think it's a Queen song, actually...
Mama-mia.
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at PilotPig: Use Coupon DOW1
--
PHP General M
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:15 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:52, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> > *runs away while lightning bolts strike him over and over*
>
> Would the sound to accompany this mental image be one of a Daffy
> Duck or Woody Woodpecker nature?
I'd go with
> -Original Message-
> From: paras...@gmail.com [mailto:paras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:16 AM
> To: Robert Cummings
> Cc: PJ; Boyd, Todd M.; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] whoami explanation
>
>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:52, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> *runs away while lightning bolts strike him over and over*
Would the sound to accompany this mental image be one of a Daffy
Duck or Woody Woodpecker nature?
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ ||
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > The way I see it, life is little more than a game played in a
> > dream; win or lose, it's still going to end, so enjoy it while it
> > lasts.
Speak for yourself
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!
*chops off Dan's head*
*runs away while lightning bolts strike him over an
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
> Right on. Good comments.
> No offense taken and none intended.
> I am enoying the list and will continue to participate, if i may.
> I have learned a great deal already and really do appreciate the help.
So you mentioned your involvement in televisio
Daniel Brown wrote:
> [Inhales]
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 01:01, PJ wrote:
>
>> Ok. You asked for it... I have to rant a bit get this off my chest as it
>> has been bugging me for a while and this is not directed at anyone in
>> particular.
>>
>
> I'm noting "for a while here.
[Inhales]
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 01:01, PJ wrote:
> Ok. You asked for it... I have to rant a bit get this off my chest as it
> has been bugging me for a while and this is not directed at anyone in
> particular.
I'm noting "for a while here"
> I do not appreciate it when there is
> -Original Message-
> From: PJ [mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:56 PM
> To: Boyd, Todd M.
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] whoami explanation
>
> Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
> >> -Original Messag
Peter Ford wrote:
PJ wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
PJ wrote:
forgot to add:
What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
quotes?
text in back ticks is executed via a shell, text in single quotes isn't.
Ok, but how does this relate to a command passed from a ph
PJ wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> PJ wrote:
>>
>>
>>> forgot to add:
>>> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
>>> quotes?
>>>
>> text in back ticks is executed via a shell, text in single quotes isn't.
>>
> Ok, but how does this relate to a command passed
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 18:56, PJ wrote:
>> But I'm sorry I missed the fun earlier about the American foibles...
>> unfortunately that should go on some other list and I wish I knew which
>> one - one that had some smarts to it (like this one) and I'd like to
>> really hear wh
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>>>
>> Gee, thanks. So, when was I supposed to have used this alias? Hell, I
>> can live with my ignorance. What's a POSIX system and why is it a POSIX
>> - a language, I think I heard
>
> cd ~
>
> brings you to your home directory.
>
> cd ~/stuff
>
> b
Michael A. Peters wrote:
With respect to value of issuing shell commands from within php - I'm
sure there are some legitimate uses. I use to do it all the time but now
I really try not to because it makes the php less portable.
You also have to be super careful with your code so that use of
PJ wrote:
Gee, thanks. So, when was I supposed to have used this alias? Hell, I
can live with my ignorance. What's a POSIX system and why is it a POSIX
- a language, I think I heard
cd ~
brings you to your home directory.
cd ~/stuff
brings you to the stuff sub-directory of your home
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 18:56, PJ wrote:
>
> But I'm sorry I missed the fun earlier about the American foibles...
> unfortunately that should go on some other list and I wish I knew which
> one - one that had some smarts to it (like this one) and I'd like to
> really hear what people think about "u
Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:07 PM
>> To: PJ
>> Cc: Daniel Brown; Per Jessen; php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP] whoami explanati
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:09:48 -0500, danbr...@php.net (Daniel Brown) wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:03, PJ wrote:
>>>
>> ok, ok, I found it but you guys are assuming that this is something
>> everybody should know... hell, I've been tinkering with programming and
>> unix etc. for many, many year
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:07 PM
> To: PJ
> Cc: Daniel Brown; Per Jessen; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] whoami explanation
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 11:16 -05
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 11:16 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:57, PJ wrote:
> >
> >> forgot to add:
> >> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
> >> quotes?
> >> How does one enter back quotes from the keyboard?
> >>
> >
> >
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:57:21AM -0500, PJ wrote:
> How does one enter back quotes from the keyboard?
Tell me you didn't seriously just ask that question.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:37, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> You have an extraneous "sometimes" in the above sentence!
Yeah, I was waiting for that ;-P
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 12:17 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:13, PJ wrote:
> >>
> > Let's not get too personnal here... it was meant to blow a kiss of
> > appreciation to all... ;-)
> > I may not be gay, but I love my gay friends... and I do not mean in the
> > way Jimmy Car
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:13, PJ wrote:
>>
> Let's not get too personnal here... it was meant to blow a kiss of
> appreciation to all... ;-)
> I may not be gay, but I love my gay friends... and I do not mean in the
> way Jimmy Carter's translators goofed when he went to Poland and
> announced tha
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:59, PJ wrote:
>
>> :-*
>>
>
> Umm thanks?
>
> (You do know that's the emoticon to symbolize kissing, right?)
>
>
Let's not get too personnal here... it was meant to blow a kiss of
appreciation to all... ;-)
I may not be gay, bu
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:59, PJ wrote:
>>
> :-*
Umm thanks?
(You do know that's the emoticon to symbolize kissing, right?)
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at PilotPig: Use Coupo
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:41, PJ wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the input and I take the chastizing with a ton of salt.
>>
>
> It's all in good fun and being the new guy, it's at your expense. ;-P
>
> Having thick skin means you'll stick around and probably lea
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:41, PJ wrote:
>
> I appreciate the input and I take the chastizing with a ton of salt.
It's all in good fun and being the new guy, it's at your expense. ;-P
Having thick skin means you'll stick around and probably learn a
lot from the folks on this list. S
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:22, PJ wrote:
>
>> Ok, but how does this relate to a command passed from a php Web page?
>> I don't understand the processus.
>> I use bash on my FreeBSD and have not needed a back quote yet that I can
>> recall... and on WinXP?
>>
>
> As
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:22, PJ wrote:
>>
> Ok, but how does this relate to a command passed from a php Web page?
> I don't understand the processus.
> I use bash on my FreeBSD and have not needed a back quote yet that I can
> recall... and on WinXP?
As in the email I just sent, remember to
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:16, PJ wrote:
>>
> I don't think it's necessary to be sarcastic...
That's okay, I'll allow it anyway.
> Hate to disappoint you, but on my computer (FreeBSD 7.0) on Firefox
> Google does not go directly to the php manual... it goes to some nitwit
> site thinkexist.co
Per Jessen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> forgot to add:
>> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
>> quotes?
>>
>
> text in back ticks is executed via a shell, text in single quotes isn't.
>
Ok, but how does this relate to a command passed from a php Web page?
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 11:03 -0500, PJ wrote:
>
> ok, ok, I found it but you guys are assuming that this is something
> everybody should know... hell, I've been tinkering with programming and
> unix etc. for many, many years and this is the first time I ran into
> back quotes.
> SORRY!
You're not t
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:57, PJ wrote:
>
>> forgot to add:
>> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
>> quotes?
>> How does one enter back quotes from the keyboard?
>>
>
> Welcome to the Internet!
>
> The first place you should
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:03, PJ wrote:
>>
> ok, ok, I found it but you guys are assuming that this is something
> everybody should know... hell, I've been tinkering with programming and
> unix etc. for many, many years and this is the first time I ran into
> back quotes.
> SORRY!
You're assu
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:57 -0500, PJ wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
> > PJ wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This really needs some explanation
> >> I found this on the web:
> >>
> >> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes
> >> matters" (WHY ?) and it works
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Per Jessen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> This really needs some explanation
>> I found this on the web:
>>
>> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes
>> matters" (WHY ?) and it works
>>
>>
>
> GIYF - look up "back quotes".
>
>
>> But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANU
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:57, PJ wrote:
>>
> forgot to add:
> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
> quotes?
> How does one enter back quotes from the keyboard?
Welcome to the Internet!
The first place you should look when you have a question is on
Google
PJ wrote:
> forgot to add:
> What's the difference between back ticks or quotes and regular single
> quotes?
text in back ticks is executed via a shell, text in single quotes isn't.
> How does one enter back quotes from the keyboard?
>
Depends on your keyboard - on my current keyboard, the ba
d...
-Original Message-
From: PJ [mailto:af.gour...@videotron.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:57 AM
To: Per Jessen
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] whoami explanation
Per Jessen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> This really needs some explanation
>> I fou
Per Jessen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> This really needs some explanation
>> I found this on the web:
>>
>> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes
>> matters" (WHY ?) and it works
>>
>>
>
> GIYF - look up "back quotes".
>
>
>> But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANU
Per Jessen wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>
>
>> This really needs some explanation
>> I found this on the web:
>>
>> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes
>> matters" (WHY ?) and it works
>>
>>
>
> GIYF - look up "back quotes".
>
>
>> But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANU
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:42, PJ wrote:
> This really needs some explanation
> I found this on the web:
>
> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes matters"
> (WHY ?)
Those are called "backtick operators." Like in BASh and most
other *NIX shells, that instructs t
PJ wrote:
> This really needs some explanation
> I found this on the web:
>
> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes
> matters" (WHY ?) and it works
>
GIYF - look up "back quotes".
> But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANUAL***_ * - exec()* executes the given
> /command
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:42 -0500, PJ wrote:
> This really needs some explanation
> I found this on the web:
>
> with it there was the comment "the direction of those single-quotes matters"
> (WHY ?)
> and it works
>
> But this (_*FROM THE PHP MANUAL***_ * - exec()* executes the given
> /com
100 matches
Mail list logo
