On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:38 -0400, Andrew Ballard wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > Stuart wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >>>
> >>> I continued the discussion with Nathan.
> >>
> >> I too have had an off-list discussion with Nathan on this topic, an
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Stuart wrote:
>>
>> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>>>
>>> I continued the discussion with Nathan.
>>
>> I too have had an off-list discussion with Nathan on this topic, and a
>> productive one at that.
>>
>
> which would probably be a good time
il.com
> To: f...@thefsb.org
> CC: nrix...@gmail.com; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] templating engine options
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> > thanks for taking the trouble to write your requirements. it made
> > interesting r
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> thanks for taking the trouble to write your requirements. it made
> interesting reading.
>
> i've questions on three points below...
>
>
> On 5/25/09 6:44 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
>
>> XSL Templates are near perfect, built for the job, and v
thanks for the pointers on xsl. i'll take a look.
On 5/26/09 6:05 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
>> it seems you're saying that there would be some kind of an intermediate
>> level of data representation that a script can be invoked to produce from
>> which different templates can produce different
Tom Worster wrote:
On 5/25/09 8:48 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
Sancar Saran wrote:
0 ) {
$content = '';
foreach( $comments as $index => $comment ) : $content. = "".$comment->title.""; endforeach;
}
?>
Comments
index.php
ob_start();
require('template.php');
echo ob_get_clean();
I'm stil
Tom Worster wrote:
thanks for taking the trouble to write your requirements. it made
interesting reading.
and thanks for taking the time to read it! it was a big one.
i've questions on three points below...
On 5/25/09 6:44 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
XSL Templates are near perfect, built
thanks for taking the trouble to write your requirements. it made
interesting reading.
i've questions on three points below...
On 5/25/09 6:44 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
> XSL Templates are near perfect, built for the job, and very powerful -
> but time hasn't favoured them well; and until (if
On 5/25/09 8:48 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
> Sancar Saran wrote:
>> > $content = 'No Comments';
>> if(isset($comments) and is_array($comments) and count($comments) > 0 ) {
>> $content = '';
>> foreach( $comments as $index => $comment ) : $content. = "".$comment->title.""; endforeach;
>> }
>> ?>
>
At 12:46 PM -0400 5/25/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
I'm going to leave this discussion here since it's eating up too much of
my time :)
Cheers,
Rob.
Rob:
It's always been my experience to listen when you talk. -- so -- when
you find some time AND have the inclination, could you prepare a
sim
At 8:13 PM +0100 5/25/09, Stuart wrote:
I too have had an off-list discussion with Nathan on this topic, and a
productive one at that.
-Stuart
Great! Now you guys are having a three-some without me. :-)
While I wasn't getting it, I was trying.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com ht
Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
Finally somebody mentioned XSL Transformations. Time is relative because as you
need time to learn an API to produce quickly only after a while, thanks to
knowledge and confidence, XSL is the same with the advantage that you transform
a data structure, rather than work
> To: stut...@gmail.com
> CC: rob...@interjinn.com; linuxmanmi...@gmail.com; tedd.sperl...@gmail.com;
> php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] templating engine options
>
> Stuart wrote:
> > 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> I continued the discussion with
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 03:48:41 am Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Sancar Saran wrote:
> > > $content = 'No Comments';
> > if(isset($comments) and is_array($comments) and count($comments) > 0 ) {
> > $content = '';
> > foreach( $comments as $index => $comment ) : $content. = "".$comment->title."";
Sancar Saran wrote:
0 ) {
$content = '';
foreach( $comments as $index => $comment ) : $content. = "".$comment->title.""; endforeach;
}
?>
Comments
index.php
ob_start();
require('template.php');
echo ob_get_clean();
I'm still do not understand for complex template s
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 01:44:43 am Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Stuart wrote:
> > 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> I continued the discussion with Nathan.
> >
> > I too have had an off-list discussion with Nathan on this topic, and a
> > productive one at that.
>
> which would probably be a good time for
Stuart wrote:
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
I continued the discussion with Nathan.
I too have had an off-list discussion with Nathan on this topic, and a
productive one at that.
which would probably be a good time for me to step back in; having had a
nice little inside in to both Robert an
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:56 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:31 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> >> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> >> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> >> >
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:56 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:31 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> >> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +010
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:31 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> >> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> >> >> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
>> >> >>
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> Have I done something to annoy you lately? You seem to be directing a
> >> lot of hostility my way recently. Just wondering.
>
Tom Worster wrote:
On 5/25/09 10:04 AM, "Stuart" wrote:
Quick question, how would you implement the following using your
XML-based template syntax...
...
It's worth noting that I'm simply suggesting a different way of
looking at the world. If you have a templating system you're happy
with
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
Have I done something to annoy you lately? You seem to be directing a
lot of hostility my way recently. Just wondering.
I'm sorry you're taking it personally... you may want to invest some
time
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:31 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> >> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> >> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
> >> >> > LinuxManMikeC wrote:
> >> >> >>
>
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
>> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> >> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
>> >> > LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
>> >> >>>
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:04 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> 2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> > On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> >> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
> >> > LinuxManMikeC wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09,
On 5/25/09 10:04 AM, "Stuart" wrote:
> Quick question, how would you implement the following using your
> XML-based template syntax...
>
> ...
>
> It's worth noting that I'm simply suggesting a different way of
> looking at the world. If you have a templating system you're happy
> with then f
On 5/23/09 6:21 PM, "Nathan Rixham" wrote:
> Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines
> other than smarty.
i started using phplib template in 2002. since then i've never bothered to
revisit that choice. it may not qualify as an engine (all it does is juggle
files and
2009/5/25 Robert Cummings :
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
>> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
>> > LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>>
At 9:06 AM -0400 5/25/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:46 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > That's where your integrity is called into question.
What's that...? :-)
One of the most important attributes a person can have. It is more
important than the person's technical abil
At 11:11 PM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
often though you have dedicated web designers who do html, css java
and nothing else - and a graphics design guy and the developers (php
+ server side) - that was a pointless comment though and it is all
scenario based.
You can wear the hat prov
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:46 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > That's where your integrity is called into question.
>
> What's that...? :-)
One of the most important attributes a person can have. It is more
important than the person's technical ability.
:)
Cheers,
Rob
--
http://www.interjinn.com
> That's where your integrity is called into question.
What's that...? :-)
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 graphing: RGraph (www.rgraph.net - updated 23rd May)
PHP mail: RMail (www.phpguru.org/rmail)
PHP datagrid: RGrid (www.phpguru.org/rgrid)
PHP Template: RTemplate (www.phpguru.org/rtemplate)
PHP SMTP:
"Sometimes I'm the windshield and sometimes I'm the bug"
Ha ha! Love that!
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:39 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > and then you have the joy of telling the client its 6 months work
>
> 6 months vs 1 day... Ka-Ching! :-)
That's where your integrity is called into question.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:26 +0100, Stuart wrote:
> 2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
> > LinuxManMikeC wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
> >>>
> >>> At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> LinuxManMikeC wrote:
> >
> > I was recently researching te
> > You're missing the point just because he threw in some old HTML
> > styling attributes. The main issue is the overhead of added parsing
> > layers to find where content goes in the HTML. Aren't we already
> > using a language (PHP) that parses for place holders for dynamic
> > content within
Hi,
> and then you have the joy of telling the client its 6 months work
6 months vs 1 day... Ka-Ching! :-)
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 graphing: RGraph (www.rgraph.net - updated 23rd May)
PHP mail: RMail (www.phpguru.org/rmail)
PHP datagrid: RGrid (www.phpguru.org/rgrid)
PHP Template: RTemplate (www
tedd wrote:
At 1:54 PM -0600 5/24/09, LinuxManMikeC wrote:
You're missing the point just because he threw in some old HTML
styling attributes. The main issue is the overhead of added parsing
layers to find where content goes in the HTML.
I may be missing the point, but I know where content go
At 1:54 PM -0600 5/24/09, LinuxManMikeC wrote:
You're missing the point just because he threw in some old HTML
styling attributes. The main issue is the overhead of added parsing
layers to find where content goes in the HTML.
I may be missing the point, but I know where content goes in my
scr
tedd wrote:
At 9:43 PM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
and now I'm questioning myself - not on the client scenario based
decisions - but on my own personal projects and things only I work
on.. why do I use a template engine? habit? some old logical decision
I made based on abstraction whic
At 9:43 PM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
and now I'm questioning myself - not on the client scenario based
decisions - but on my own personal projects and things only I work
on.. why do I use a template engine? habit? some old logical
decision I made based on abstraction which somehow rul
Stuart wrote:
2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
I was recently researching template engines for a small in-house
project, with a bias toward simple and lightweight
2009/5/24 Nathan Rixham :
> LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
>>>
>>> At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>
> I was recently researching template engines for a small in-house
> project, with a bias toward
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
I was recently researching template engines for a small in-house
project, with a bias toward simple and lightweight. I found this
interesting article in my
2009/5/23 Nathan Rixham :
> Hi All,
>
> Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines other
> than smarty.
>
> I've got no problem with smarty and it does the job - but if there is
> something newer and lighter out there that I'm missing then I'd be a fool
> not to at least
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, tedd wrote:
> At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>>>
>>> I was recently researching template engines for a small in-house
>>> project, with a bias toward simple and lightweight. I found this
>>> interesting article in my se
> ...
For a long time I used require(), simply because I worked in an
environment where the web people could either cope with PHP or were
programmers. But then I succumbed to the lure and wrote RTemplate
(http://www.phpguru.org/rtemplate) - a simple caching template doobry.
And now I still use re
i use smarty (a templating engine) for two important reasons...
1. in most of my projects, templates are designed by a third party and
i dont want them to access all my php variables.
2. smarty is meant to do html coding and in many cases i can get the
job done in single sentence, while it takes 3
At 12:01 AM +0100 5/24/09, Nathan Rixham wrote:
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
I was recently researching template engines for a small in-house
project, with a bias toward simple and lightweight. I found this
interesting article in my search. I think its worth considering if
you don't need all the bells
I've had a lot of success with Savant3: www.phpsavant.com becuase it's
pretty featureful yet fast(er than the alternatives I tested).
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> LinuxManMikeC wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Ju
LinuxManMikeC wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines other
than smarty.
I've got no problem with smarty and it does the job - but if there is
something newer and lighter out there that I'm miss
Kevin Waterson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 23:21 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines
other than smarty.
I've got no problem with smarty and it does the job - but if there is
something newer and lighter out there that I'm
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 23:21 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines
> other than smarty.
>
> I've got no problem with smarty and it does the job - but if there is
> something newer and lighter out there that I'm missing the
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a quick one, can anybody recommend any decent templating engines other
> than smarty.
>
> I've got no problem with smarty and it does the job - but if there is
> something newer and lighter out there that I'm missing then I'd
I just wanted to add that Richards technique is a good way to go.
I often use something very similar, the only difference being that I
make the head() and foot() function methods in class (an instance
of the class being created by the global include file for the given site
e.g:
class Page
{
Hey Tedd,
> >
> >> > He just needs maybe 5 template
> >> > pages, same pages, different color.
> >>
> >> For something THIS simple, I truly believe you
> are
> >> Better Off (tm)
> >> with a simple head() and foot() function in a
> >> globals.inc file:
> >
> >Sorry, dont know where my brain was t
At 3:37 AM -0700 6/23/06, Ryan A wrote:
>Hi Rich,
>Thanks for replying.
>
>
>> > He just needs maybe 5 template
>> > pages, same pages, different color.
>>
>> For something THIS simple, I truly believe you are
>> Better Off (tm)
>> with a simple head() and foot() function in a
>> globals.inc file:
At 9:57 PM -0500 6/22/06, Richard Lynch wrote:
>On Thu, June 22, 2006 7:23 pm, tedd wrote:
>-snip-
> >>
>
>> Well... I prefer to separate the header and footer into two files and
>> load them as needed in my web page. In addition, I would most
>> certainly remove ALL attribute stuff that could/sh
Hi Rich,
Thanks for replying.
> > He just needs maybe 5 template
> > pages, same pages, different color.
>
> For something THIS simple, I truly believe you are
> Better Off (tm)
> with a simple head() and foot() function in a
> globals.inc file:
Sorry, dont know where my brain was that day, wha
On Thu, June 22, 2006 7:23 pm, tedd wrote:
> At 6:26 PM -0500 6/22/06, Richard Lynch wrote:
>>On Thu, June 22, 2006 6:10 am, Ryan A wrote:
>>> He just needs maybe 5 template
>>> pages, same pages, different color.
>>
>>For something THIS simple, I truly believe you are Better Off (tm)
>>with a simp
At 6:26 PM -0500 6/22/06, Richard Lynch wrote:
>On Thu, June 22, 2006 6:10 am, Ryan A wrote:
>> He just needs maybe 5 template
>> pages, same pages, different color.
>
>For something THIS simple, I truly believe you are Better Off (tm)
>with a simple head() and foot() function in a globals.inc file
On Thu, June 22, 2006 6:10 am, Ryan A wrote:
> He just needs maybe 5 template
> pages, same pages, different color.
For something THIS simple, I truly believe you are Better Off (tm)
with a simple head() and foot() function in a globals.inc file:
function head($title = "My Site", $bgcolor = '#fff
Miles Thompson wrote:
Don't forget, PHP itself is a templating language. Just do a standard
page, with includes for headers and footers, menus, and content.
If he wants to change colour, then load a different stylesheet for a
given page or content section.
This way he can use the tool that's rig
IMHO I would go with Smarty as it has excellent documentation and
would fit almost anything that the project would require. I also
think it would be a cleaner way of templating than using str_replace
() over and over again. For what it's worth, I use Smarty on almost
all of my projects, larg
On 22/06/06, Miles Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 08:10 AM 6/22/2006, Ryan A wrote:>Hi,>>A pal of mine needed some help on his project, he is>using a "header" and "footer" file to "template" his>project... but its gotten a bit complicated as he has
>a few dynamic parts in the header and foo
At 08:10 AM 6/22/2006, Ryan A wrote:
Hi,
A pal of mine needed some help on his project, he is
using a "header" and "footer" file to "template" his
project... but its gotten a bit complicated as he has
a few dynamic parts in the header and footer files, so
I told him to go with a proper templati
Ryan A wrote:
Hi,
A pal of mine needed some help on his project, he is
using a "header" and "footer" file to "template" his
project... but its gotten a bit complicated as he has
a few dynamic parts in the header and footer files, so
I told him to go with a proper templating method of
templatin
Ryan,
I would still recommend Smarty.
It can be as big as you like, but it can also be very simple to set up and
maintain. It has the features should your friend decide to expand his usage
in the future. If you opt now for something with limited features and later
decide to step beyond them, you'
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 17:17, Murray @ PlanetThoughtful wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So, if anyone out there uses a templating system (ie Smarty, PHPSavant etc)
> and they don't work in a team environment, I'd love to hear what benefits
> you derive from so doing.
I do for as many projects as possible. No
I use Smarty and am the lone developer. Why - Easiest to give an
example that I did.
I have my site with 7 pages. Each page has a minimum of 4 templates for
it (though 6 is the average). Time goes on and I decided I wanted to
completely change the look of my site (currently can't handle the
rush wrote:
"Mattias Thorslund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(On the subject of templating engines, again.)
I wonder what you folks think of the following:
http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/
hi!
It is nicely written, but actually, I think
"Mattias Thorslund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (On the subject of templating engines, again.)
>
> I wonder what you folks think of the following:
> http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/
hi!
It is nicely written, but actually, I think completely
(On the subject of templating engines, again.)
I wonder what you folks think of the following:
http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/template_engines/
I've been using the template class in the example of the article. I
think it's easy to use and very flexible, since it uses PHP as the
actual templ
At 5:43 PM -0800 4/28/05, Clive Zagno wrote:
Hi all,
What templating engines do you use with php and why?
Ive been using smarty (http://smarty.php.net)
I've used include(), and smarty, but now use Expression Engine
http://www.pmachine.com. EE which is more of a CMS than just a
templating system,
> I'm a big fan of include(). ;)
Ditto!
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 4/27/2005
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Greg Donald wrote:
On 4/28/05, Clive Zagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What templating engines do you use with php and why?
I use eval(). Because it works.
Myself, I'm partial to include(). ;)
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http
Greg Donald wrote:
On 4/28/05, Clive Zagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What templating engines do you use with php and why?
I use eval(). Because it works.
I'm a big fan of include(). ;)
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://ww
On 4/28/05, Clive Zagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What templating engines do you use with php and why?
I use eval(). Because it works.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/uns
You can always roll your own, it's not that hard at all. Here is an
example:
ob_start();
include("templateFile");
$tpl_file = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
The contents of your template file are now in the variable $tpl_file
and you can you str_replace to input the data. Remember that
str_
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 18:20, Trent Gillespie wrote:
> I have a template file that I would like to add the content to no write over it. I
>want the string $content to be added to my template instead of writing over it. Here
>is my current script
>
> $tutorial = "template.php";
>
>
> $fp = fope
Woops -- first link is to the site for PHPFastTemplate.
> Lauri --
> You might want to take a look at: http://www.thewebmasters.net/php/
> there's a tutorial located here:
> http://www.devshed.com/Server_Side/PHP/PHPFastTemplate/page1.html
>
> -- David
>> Hi there!
>>
>> During the last two we
Lauri --
You might want to take a look at: http://www.thewebmasters.net/php/
there's a tutorial located here:
http://www.devshed.com/Server_Side/PHP/PHPFastTemplate/page1.html
-- David
> Hi there!
>
> During the last two weeks or so, I've been bugged by a question deep
> inside me. It's about v
A great solution for this kind of job is Midgard (www.midgard-project.org). It
provides heaps of features oriented to solving all your possible problems -- user
control/access; separate content and "style" templates, manages includes
automatically so you don't have to fiddle around tens or hundred
> $template_file = "".$template_root."".$template_file."";
What are those empty strings supposed to do? This is the same thing:
$template_file = $template_root.$template_file;
> return implode("",(@file($template_file)));
Ack! That's horrible. Do this instead:
85 matches
Mail list logo
