Raditha, et al --
...and then Raditha Dissanayake said...
%
% Hello David,
Hi!
% looks like a bit of a tough one :-) guess you might be better off trying
Indeed.
% one of the qmail groups instead of this one. Sorry my own qmail
Oh, whoops! Yes, I'm already being a general pest on the qm
Hello David,
looks like a bit of a tough one :-) guess you might be better off trying
one of the qmail groups instead of this one. Sorry my own qmail
expertise isn't as good as it should be.
best regards
raditha
David T-G wrote:
jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello
jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% I recall someone (pardone me i don't save list mails) pointing out that
% the delay could actually be in generating the message rather than in the
Yep. Nope.
% sending. You are sending a customized message to each
Hello,
I recall someone (pardone me i don't save list mails) pointing out that
the delay could actually be in generating the message rather than in the
sending. You are sending a customized message to each user aren't you?
Would you be creating this message from what's in a mysql database or
s
Jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% having you tried ezmlm or to directly inject the message into the que?
Yes, I've tried qmail-inject. I got down to about 0.41s/msg which is
still terrible.
Thanks & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * There is too much anim
having you tried ezmlm or to directly inject the message into the que?
Javier Tacon wrote:
I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
SMTP to leave the mail. Do you have the same sendmail version in two
* Thus wrote David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> It seems to be the mail() call itself, because I can make a system call
> (system, exec, passthru) to just echo the current data and it rips
> through my list in nothin' flat. So how do I tune mail() to make it
> faster? Or do I need to give up and
Javier --
...and then Javier Tacon said...
%
% May be the machine of your friend has a better network output than your
% machine :)
Heh :-) Hey, stranger things have happenned!
But check my other followup for an interesting twist.
Thanks again & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
May be the machine of your friend has a better network output than your
machine :)
-Mensaje original-
De: David T-G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miercoles, 27 de agosto de 2003 11:59
Para: PHP General list
CC: Javier Tacon
Asunto: Re: [PHP] speed of mail() on two servers
Javier, et al --
...and then Javier Tacon said...
%
% I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
% linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
Right. Only it doesn't make much sense, because qmail is FAST.
% SMTP to leave the mail. Do you hav
I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
SMTP to leave the mail. Do you have the same sendmail version in two
machines? You should compare both sendmail configuration and try to
check the speed from a
11 matches
Mail list logo