functions/variables. With ZE2, they
>wouldn't have to.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Rossi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, 12 January 2003 11:23 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [PHP] php5 cvs
>
>
>its cool ,
ECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] php5 cvs
its cool , i cant remember where i saw the reference , but it was claiming
to prefix the functions with underscores to denote private functions in php
4 for the rollover of php5, it was a pretty legit resource i cant remember
where though
dding source code now and
then :D
-Original Message-
From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 11:13 PM
To: electroteque
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] php5 cvs
Not sure what you mean by 'changed', but the way to denote private
functio
Not sure what you mean by 'changed', but the way to denote private
functions is by adding 'private' to the method declaration, and not by
prefixing them with _.
You can do it using:
class bar {
private function foo()
{
...
}
...
};
Zeev
At 09:43
_test() and test(), means i'll have to rewrite my functions again :|
-Original Message-
From: Sean Malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 7:52 PM
To: electroteque; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] php5 cvs
try
private function()
{
}
-Original
try
private function()
{
}
-Original Message-
From: electroteque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 January 2003 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] php5 cvs
hmm has the public and private function accessor changed ? i have been
building my classes with test() and
hmm has the public and private function accessor changed ? i have been
building my classes with test() and _test() to differentiate from public and
private and have been waiting to try it out but i can still access both ! ??
"Electroteque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">ne
lol no , i am gonna try and upgrade my workfrom dinasour php3 to php 4.3, i
have a development box here @ home i just upgraded to the 4.3 release from
rc3 and am gonna try out version 5 then it doesnt matter how stable it is at
home really :D
"Danny Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
0
It includes the latest CVS build of ZendEngine 2.0 - AFAIK it hasn't even
reached beta status yet, so don't even think about using it for production
work. That said, I didn't have any problems building it and it seems pretty
stable.
A list of changes and features can be found at
http://www.php.net
9 matches
Mail list logo
