On Wednesday 10 January 2007 17:47, Philip Thompson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a lot
> of overhead?
>
> I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each of those
> opens a new connection to the database, performs the necessary
> action
t'
Subject: Re: [PHP] mssql_* overhead
bruce wrote:
> hi phillip...
>
> just to clarify regarding having the mysql resource ID in a session var.
are
> you saying that you're able to more or less, do a mysql_connect and store
> the resourceID in a session var, which can then
bruce wrote:
hi phillip...
just to clarify regarding having the mysql resource ID in a session var. are
you saying that you're able to more or less, do a mysql_connect and store
the resourceID in a session var, which can then be used on any given page
within your site, without having to recall t
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-10 10:49:35 -0600:
> On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >Philip Thompson wrote:
> >>Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a
> >>lot of overhead?
You can quite easily find out what effect those function have on the
performance
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:28 AM
To: php General List
Subject: Re: [PHP] mssql_* overhead
I just wanted to make sure that there is no speed decrease if I
change from $_SESSION to $GLOBALS to hold my connection (even with
lots of people). I guess that's my question?
Thank
Ok, just kidding. Thank you Jim and Jochem. You answered my question
in your previous posts!
Thanks to all!
~Phil
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Philip Thompson wrote:
I just wanted to make sure that there is no speed decrease if I
change from $_SESSION to $GLOBALS to hold my connection (ev
I just wanted to make sure that there is no speed decrease if I
change from $_SESSION to $GLOBALS to hold my connection (even with
lots of people). I guess that's my question?
Thanks,
~Philip
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the same thing as Jochem... that
Philip Thompson wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
>> Philip Thompson wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a lot of
>>> overhead?
>>>
>>> I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each of those
>>> opens a new c
Philip Thompson wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Philip Thompson wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a lot of
overhead?
I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each of those
opens a new connection to the database, pe
I thought the same thing as Jochem... that resources like database connections,
couldn't be stored in $_SESSION. You say that's how you have (had?) it set up
and it was working, but still sounds wrong to me.
As for connections.. definitely don't open a new connection every time you run
a functi
On 1/10/07, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Philip Thompson wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a
>> lot of
>> overhead?
>>
>> I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each
On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Philip Thompson wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a
lot of
overhead?
I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each of those
opens a new connection to the database, performs the necessary
Philip Thompson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone know if the mssql_connect/_init/_bind/etc require a lot of
> overhead?
>
> I have a page that requires multiple function calls and each of those
> opens a new connection to the database, performs the necessary actions
> in stored procedure(s), and then
13 matches
Mail list logo
