// glob returns an ordered list (rtfm: man glob)
// relies on the use of the operator ++ to generate string sequences.
function lastFileInSequence($path, $prefix, $first, $suffix) {
return array_pop(glob($path . "/" . $prefix . str_repeat('?',
strlen($first)) . $suffix));
}
function nextFileI
At 11:47 PM -0400 9/29/07, brian wrote:
You and i have had our run-ins on this list on more than one
occasion. Until now, i've chosen to take your crap in stride.
brian
I haven't noticed any "run-ins". I don't care if you've been the
biggest prick on the net -- if you ask a question and it's
gee you guys behave like kids. don't you all have other things to do than
whinge, swear and blame each other on the list? Take it elsewhere and sort
it out. This is bad for the PHP community in general. It doesn't reflect what
the community is about.
my 2c.
On Sunday 30 September 2007 13:47,
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 23:47 -0400, brian wrote:
>
> It's not so much that i disrespect Rob. It's just that i felt i had to
> call him out for being a dickhead by taking my statement out of context.
Ok, so I'm a dickhead. What does that make you? A vagina?
Name calling really is the lowest form o
tedd wrote:
At 8:30 PM -0400 9/27/07, brian wrote:
I wasn't bitching! And i *thought* that my numerous attempts at
explaining such would have been enough. Obviously not, but wtf can you
do with people who seem to want only to stir up shit?
It sure sounded like you were bitching.
Gee, thanks
; From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2007 17:20
> To: brian; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] counting with leading zeros
>
> At 8:30 PM -0400 9/27/07, brian wrote:
> >I wasn't bitching! And i *thought* that my numerous attempts at
&g
At 8:30 PM -0400 9/27/07, brian wrote:
I wasn't bitching! And i *thought* that my numerous attempts at
explaining such would have been enough. Obviously not, but wtf can you
do with people who seem to want only to stir up shit?
It sure sounded like you were bitching.
And, your off-list "fuck y
tedd wrote:
At 3:58 PM -0400 9/26/07, brian wrote:
Well, this is almost precisely the same thing i have, save for
using POSIX character classes, str_pad instead of sprintf(), and
incrementing elsewhere. What i was really wondering is if there was
a *much simpler* way to do this, not just re-
At 10:39 PM -0400 9/26/07, brian wrote:
Now you're obviously just trying to be a dickhead.
While someone is, it's not Rob.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: h
Robert Cummings wrote:
Suit yourself. But better programmer's don't just wave their hands in
the air and hope for the best.
Ah crap -- there's another technique I have to cross off my list.
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PH
At 3:58 PM -0400 9/26/07, brian wrote:
Well, this is almost precisely the same thing i have, save for using
POSIX character classes, str_pad instead of sprintf(), and
incrementing elsewhere. What i was really wondering is if there was
a *much simpler* way to do this, not just re-arranging thing
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 21:56 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote:
>
> Now, if you plan to delete any images in the list, this will not work.
>
> But if you don't expect to delete any images in the list and always want
> the ($total_images + 1), then follow along.
>
>
> function getNextImage($path, $prefix)
brian wrote:
I have a directory that contains many images (no, not pr0n,
unfortunately) and i'm working on an admin script for adding to it. I've
got something that works alright but i'm wondering if there's a Better Way.
Each image is named like: foo_01.jpg, foo_02.jpg, bar_01.jpg, and so on.
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 00:23 -0400, brian wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > When you use sort() the default behaviour is a lexical sort. This is why
> > the 100th index breaks your system. I'm not trying to be a dickhead,
> > just pointing out the flaw in your logic. You may be well aware that in
Robert Cummings wrote:
When you use sort() the default behaviour is a lexical sort. This is why
the 100th index breaks your system. I'm not trying to be a dickhead,
just pointing out the flaw in your logic. You may be well aware that in
counting 100 comes after 99, but it would seem you are not w
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 22:39 -0400, brian wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:10 -0400, brian wrote:
> >
> >>If my response to that gave you the impression i was
> >>complaining, i assure you that i wasn't. I was simply suggesting
> >>that i was wondering if there was a *mu
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:10 -0400, brian wrote:
If my response to that gave you the impression i was
complaining, i assure you that i wasn't. I was simply suggesting
that i was wondering if there was a *much* simpler way to do this, ie.
without using several functions to
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 19:10 -0400, brian wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> >> Well, this is almost precisely the same thing i have, save for
> >> using POSIX character classes, str_pad instead of sprintf(), and
> >> incrementing elsewhere. What i was really wondering is if there was
> >> a *mu
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:58 -0400, brian wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:11 -0400, brian wrote:
I have a directory that contains many images (no, not pr0n,
unfortunately) and i'm working on an admin script for adding to
it. I've got something
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:58 -0400, brian wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:11 -0400, brian wrote:
> >
> >>I have a directory that contains many images (no, not pr0n,
> >>unfortunately) and i'm working on an admin script for adding to it. I've
> >>got something that wor
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:11 -0400, brian wrote:
I have a directory that contains many images (no, not pr0n,
unfortunately) and i'm working on an admin script for adding to it. I've
got something that works alright but i'm wondering if there's a Better Way.
Each image i
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 15:11 -0400, brian wrote:
> I have a directory that contains many images (no, not pr0n,
> unfortunately) and i'm working on an admin script for adding to it. I've
> got something that works alright but i'm wondering if there's a Better Way.
>
> Each image is named like: foo
22 matches
Mail list logo
