subject:"RE\: \[PHP\] best php editor"

Re: [PHP] best php editor

2001-07-27 Thread Chip

ROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:51 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [PHP] best php editor > > > > Then you must be one of the 3% who voted "Bad" at cnet.com ;) > > > > "Martin Marconcini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [PHP] best php editor

2001-07-27 Thread Martin Marconcini

> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP] best php editor > > Then you must be one of the 3% who voted "Bad" at cnet.com ;) > > "Martin Marconcini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 001401c11673$

Re: [PHP] best php editor

2001-07-27 Thread elias

Then you must be one of the 3% who voted "Bad" at cnet.com ;) "Martin Marconcini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 001401c11673$9b2926a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:001401c11673$9b2926a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > languages. It is called HTML-kit! I absolutely love it and felt I had > to > > share

RE: [PHP] best php editor

2001-07-27 Thread Martin Marconcini

> languages. It is called HTML-kit! I absolutely love it and felt I had to > share that love with you all. > > It is free. A little like Homesite, except better in my view. Certainly > far > more feature-rich for PHP scripting. > > Unless I'm missing some serious drawback, it's the best editor f