Brad Broerman wrote:
Essentially, they all require Flash or Java...
You are generally talking about two different sides of the client/server
relationship.. unless you are talking about Applets, right?... so I have
an issue with the statement. If jquery does one (as mentioned), it's
likely n
: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:29 AM
To: sstap...@mnsi.net
Cc: PHP
Subject: Re: [PHP] Upload Progress Meter
On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 09:59 -0400, Floyd Resler wrote:
>> I am in need of an upload progress meter. I've seen plenty of tutorial
On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 09:59 -0400, Floyd Resler wrote:
>> I am in need of an upload progress meter. I've seen plenty of tutorials =
>> on-line requiring installing modules, hooks, patches, etc. However, my =
>> Wordpress install accomplished
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 09:59 -0400, Floyd Resler wrote:
> I am in need of an upload progress meter. I've seen plenty of tutorials =
> on-line requiring installing modules, hooks, patches, etc. However, my =
> Wordpress install accomplished this without me having to make any =
> modifications to my
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 02:20 -0800, mike wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > Whoever said anything about open FTP?
>
> how else do you do it?
>
> either it's open/anonymous, or some hardcoded account info. either
> way, not very secure, and due to the nature
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> Whoever said anything about open FTP?
how else do you do it?
either it's open/anonymous, or some hardcoded account info. either
way, not very secure, and due to the nature of it, kinda requires the
user to have enough privileges to uploa
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:35 -0800, mike wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > There are a lot of free FTP Java applets out there, which you could
> > easily integrate with a web page and your hosting. You'll have the
> > advantage of a familiar interface, multipl
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> And more and more people are using something like noscript to block it
> because XSS hacks are out of control. It is too easy to publish a website
> and too many web developers only care about their own data, they don't care
> about prote
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> There are a lot of free FTP Java applets out there, which you could
> easily integrate with a web page and your hosting. You'll have the
> advantage of a familiar interface, multiple uploads, queues, and
> progress bars. Worst case scenario
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 15:02 -0800, mike wrote:
> Yes you can do it with only javascript but you'll need server
> components to deal with large files ... Which the OP does not have
> access to. Post and file limits could become an issue.
>
> Not to mention flash and java penetration is huge. I
mike wrote:
Yes you can do it with only javascript but you'll need server components
to deal with large files ... Which the OP does not have access to. Post
and file limits could become an issue.
Not to mention flash and java penetration is huge. I think flash is on
something like 96% of brow
Yes you can do it with only javascript but you'll need server
components to deal with large files ... Which the OP does not have
access to. Post and file limits could become an issue.
Not to mention flash and java penetration is huge. I think flash is on
something like 96% of browsers now..
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> I have just been wondering for the 20 zillion time why does people always
> stick together "20" and "zillion"? you can't just use "zillion times"? is
> that not enough for you?
Actually, instead of 20 zillion I would say 2 bazillion, or .2
gazillion. Now if I really wanted
Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
I have just been wondering for the 20 zillion time why does people
always stick together "20" and "zillion"? you can't just use "zillion
times"? is that not enough for you?
My server can handle 19 zillion multiple submits.
;)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.
I have just been wondering for the 20 zillion time why does people always
stick together "20" and "zillion"? you can't just use "zillion times"? is
that not enough for you?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> mike wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Boyd, Todd M.
mike wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
Gears will allow you to do a lot of things. So will site-proprietary Firefox
extensions that go well outside the realm of basic client-server interaction
via webpages. I was under the impression that Gears requires a local
ins
> -Original Message-
> From: mike [mailto:mike...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 12:59 PM
> To: Boyd, Todd M.
> Cc: PHP General list
> Subject: Re: [PHP] upload progress (was www.soongy.com)
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Boyd, Todd M. wrote:
> Gears will allow you to do a lot of things. So will site-proprietary Firefox
> extensions that go well outside the realm of basic client-server interaction
> via webpages. I was under the impression that Gears requires a local
> installati
> -Original Message-
> From: mike [mailto:mike...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 12:17 AM
> To: Gevorg Harutyunyan
> Cc: tedd; German Geek; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] www.soongy.com
>
> I have a basic demo here. The code is not at it's best, you have to
> hit
On Tue, April 25, 2006 9:55 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
> that
> the replies I've gotten from this list so far suggest that internals
> of
> PHP development are seriously opposed to such a feature?
They may or may not be opposed to attempting to use server-side
technology to
On Tue, April 25, 2006 9:23 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Tue, April 25, 2006 5:28 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>>
>>> Everything PHP returns from a server is "client side", so your
>>>
>> Oh yeah. I forgot to say...
>> The above presumption is patently false.
>>
>
> Let
Richard Lynch wrote:
Anything you see with "PHP" "upload progress meter" together has to
be some kind of hack whose under-pinning is NOT PHP at all, but is
JavaScript or similar client-side technology.
Not true. The graphical display is HTML, DHTML, JavaScript, etc...but
the means of monitoring
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, April 25, 2006 5:28 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Everything PHP returns from a server is "client side", so your
Oh yeah. I forgot to say...
The above presumption is patently false.
Let me clarify: Assuming client/server architecture, if PHP is on the
[snip]
...a pretty good discussion...
[/snip]
I have used output buffering to flush stuff (like lengthy data) to the
client before the end of the script so that those pesky users could see
something was happening (because they couldn't be bothered to watch the
browser's progress meter) and at one
On Tue, April 25, 2006 5:27 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Tue, April 25, 2006 12:18 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>> Why don't you ask the guys who write BROWSERS why *they* don't
>> provide
>> a nice API/interface to display progress, or, better yet, why the
>> browser itself
On Tue, April 25, 2006 5:28 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Everything PHP returns from a server is "client side", so your
Oh yeah. I forgot to say...
The above presumption is patently false.
:-)
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On Tue, April 25, 2006 5:28 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Tue, April 25, 2006 12:18 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>> Anything you see with "PHP" "upload progress meter" together has to
>> be
>> some kind of hack whose under-pinning is NOT PHP at all, but is
>> JavaScript o
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, April 25, 2006 12:18 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which direction the PHP community is going
when it comes to an upload progress meter.Since that meter would necessarily be
CLIENT side, the PHP community
is pretty much ignoring it, s
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, April 25, 2006 12:18 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
I'm trying to figure out which direction the PHP community is going
when
it comes to an upload progress meter.
Since that meter would necessarily be CLIENT side, the PHP community
is pretty much ignoring it, since
On Tue, April 25, 2006 12:18 pm, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out which direction the PHP community is going
> when
> it comes to an upload progress meter.
Since that meter would necessarily be CLIENT side, the PHP community
is pretty much ignoring it, since PHP runs on the SERVE
http://electroteque.dyndns.org:1023/demo/uploader/
following my other posts i have a working flash progress bar , although i
cannot remove the empty arrays in the count how can i remove empty arrays in
an array , the empty file inputs seem to still contain something , so
instead of 1 as the count
> A bunch of inpatient stupid users whom
> are click happy when they get impatient.
> impatient, not very technical, people. People who kept canceling and
> canceling, despite our directions, because they thought it was stuck or
> frozen or taking too long.
the simplest and most elegant work aro
ver something like a
> progress bar. Who
> knows. It's got to be something other than PHP though because
> PHP is after
> all only a server side language.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jed Verity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002
ver something like a
> progress bar. Who
> knows. It's got to be something other than PHP though because
> PHP is after
> all only a server side language.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jed Verity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002
refore giving a lot of control over something like a progress bar. Who
knows. It's got to be something other than PHP though because PHP is after
all only a server side language.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Verity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: J
Paul Roberts
http://www.paul-roberts.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Buerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Upload Progress
Ya' know guys i&#x
hing like a progress bar. Who
knows. It's got to be something other than PHP though because PHP is after
all only a server side language.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Verity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Jay Blanchard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're right about it costing more money. But we had one server handling a
bunch of uploads, most of them over 25 MB, and 99% being instigated by very
impatient, not very technical, people. People who kept canceling and
canceling, despite our directions, because they thought it was stuck or
frozen
[snip]
There really isn't a great solution for this, that I know of. It's one of
the few things that makes an argument for ASP over PHP, as far as I'm
concerned (if you have the luxury of choosing). Below is what I did once to
try to get around the problem. It worked *okay*.
[/snip]
How does this
> How is this an argument for ASP? HTTP has no way of tracking file
> upload progress, no matter what scripting language you are using.
Asp has some nice upload components (ATL/COM), which handle the upload
progress. Therefor they will be able to put nice upload dialogs to the user.
On the other
"Jed Verity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There really isn't a great solution for this, that I know of. It's one of
> the few things that makes an argument for ASP over PHP, as far as I'm
> concerned (if you have the luxury of choosing).
How is this an argument for ASP? HTTP has no way of track
Yikes, I sort of lied. It's been awhile...
Clients uploaded files from an intranet server to an external servier via
their browser and ftp_put. It wasn't local machine to remote server.
Sorry! Best of luck,
Jed
P.S. I wonder, though, if there isn't some way to execute a script with
exec() to ge
Sorry, I wrote too quickly. I meant that the file size field value is passed
to the bottom frame. And JavaScript is used to resize the gif, not DHTML.
(Used to be DHTML when I was adding nbsp instead of resizing an image.)
HTH,
Jed
On the threshold of genius, Jed Verity wrote:
> There really is
There really isn't a great solution for this, that I know of. It's one of
the few things that makes an argument for ASP over PHP, as far as I'm
concerned (if you have the luxury of choosing). Below is what I did once to
try to get around the problem. It worked *okay*.
The bummer is that I had to
44 matches
Mail list logo
