that said how often do you _really_ need a 1 or a 0,
Surprisingly enough, I need it quite often. Enough so that I keep an
example nearby.
I'm assuming that the
1 or 0 are used to detemine an on/off state. is my assumption correct?
Mostly even/odd, this/that, right/left, on/off, up/down, se
On Mon, April 17, 2006 7:14 pm, Jochem Maas wrote:
> tedd wrote:
>> Hey:
>>
>> Didn't anyone like my --
>>
>> "Whenever I need a 1 or 0, I use ($i & 1)."
>>
>> -- comment?
>>
>> I though that was pretty clever, but no one even said "How's your
>> Mum?".
I don't like it for 2-column display or alte
How's your Mum?
tedd wrote:
Hey:
Didn't anyone like my --
"Whenever I need a 1 or 0, I use ($i & 1)."
-- comment?
I though that was pretty clever, but no one even said "How's your Mum?".
well it's a basic bitwise operation, anyone who has been doing for a while
wouldn't think much of it an
tedd wrote:
Jochem:
...
Thanks.
tedd
PS: You're getting two copies of this Jochem because I can't figure out
which not to send. :-)
I get double copies of most replies to stuff I've written on this list,
it doesn't bother me at all - the only annoyance is the ID10Ts that have been
her
Hey:
Didn't anyone like my --
"Whenever I need a 1 or 0, I use ($i & 1)."
-- comment?
I though that was pretty clever, but no one even said "How's your Mum?".
tedd
--
http://sperling.com
--
PHP General Mailing
Jochem:
Hell, I have enough problems trying to remember to remove your
email address when I reply to all. :-)
I thought the 'rule' around here was do a 'reply to all' - someone
put me right if I've been an idiot all this time!
Nooo, I wouldn't use the term... idiot. :-)
What I typically do
On Monday 17 April 2006 14:04, Jochem Maas wrote:
> I thought the 'rule' around here was do a 'reply to all' - someone
> put me right if I've been an idiot all this time!
I use Kmail, and it has a feature to just reply to the mailing list, so I
generally use that. Reply to all is definitely easi
..
Jochem:
Oh, I wasn't defending Jay -- I didn't even know anything was in
dispute. I'm clueless as usual -- just putting in my $0.02 as I can.
I'm luckyh if I have .01 to throw around ;-)
Hell, I have enough problems trying to remember to remove your email
address when I reply to all.
but tedd there is no need to go defending Jay. I was merely chatting
with him on a
theoretical level, not telling nwhat he should/must be doing
(because a, he's been
doing this stuff longer than I have been alive ;-) and b, I know that he knows
the difference between doing it 'right' and doing i
tedd wrote:
Jay said:
...
Yep, nothing wrong with using tables to show column data -- that's what
tables are for.
that's my point - columns have nothing to do with the data structure, it's
a presentation issue - technically it's a list of products. ergo: UL iso TABLE.
personally I think
Jay said:
With a simple loop I can create the data in columns in a table. It is a
table of products, each product's features, etc. I am not too worried
about the client changing the layout at a later date as that would
likely be driven by me...maybe. :) The code which makes the multiple
columns
[snip]
time limits always dictate the 'get it working' solution, that said
Paul's suggestion is rather better than using a table for a couple of
reasons (imho):
1. it saves you having to pre-order/split/etc the original data so that
you can then loop them/it in order to dump out a table.
2. it me
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Pardon my asking on the eve of your launch, but is a table the most
sensible markup for this data? It looks to me like a one-dimensional
list that just happens to be presented two to a row.
If so, I'd use an unordered list, float each item left, and limit the
lis
[snip]
Pardon my asking on the eve of your launch, but is a table the most
sensible markup for this data? It looks to me like a one-dimensional
list that just happens to be presented two to a row.
If so, I'd use an unordered list, float each item left, and limit the
list width to two item widt
At 05:19 PM 4/16/2006, Jay Blanchard wrote:
I have a table of data and I want to display items by two's, i.e.
Item 1 Item 2
Item 3 Item 4
Item 5
Pardon my asking on the eve of your launch, but is a table the most
sensible markup for this data? It looks to me like a one-dimensional
[snip]
Something like this?
$c = 0;
while($c < $itemcount) {
if ($c % 2 == 0)
$c++;
}
[/snip]
Yep! Thanks!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 4/17/06, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that this is simple, and again I am operating on little rest in
> the quest to get a site launch by sometime tomorrow evening.
>
> I have a table of data and I want to display items by two's, i.e.
>
> Item 1 Item 2
> Item 3 Item
17 matches
Mail list logo
