Angus Mann wrote:
> The number of emails sent is very small. Each one is only sent after a
> user fills out a form and presses send.
>
> But there is a noticable lag of about 5 or sometimes 10 seconds after
> pressing "send" before the user sees the "Mail sent" page. I presume
> the reason for th
Hello,
on 01/27/2010 12:07 AM Eric Lee said the following:
> Hi, all
>
> I'am doubted about installing a local mail server for just low volume
> mailing.
> May I ask all yours professional what do you think about it ?
I do not use nor recommend Windows for delivering messages to many
recipients,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:07:13AM +0800, Eric Lee wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I'am doubted about installing a local mail server for just low volume
> mailing.
> May I ask all yours professional what do you think about it ?
>
Every place I've ever hosted (all Linux servers) include a local MTA
which i
Hi, all
I'am doubted about installing a local mail server for just low volume
mailing.
May I ask all yours professional what do you think about it ?
Thanks in advanced.
Regards,
Eric,
> --
> Jim Lucas
> NOC Manager
> 541-323-9113
> BendTel, Inc.
> http://www.bendtel.com
>
> --
> PHP Gener
Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Angus Mann wrote:
>> I'm currently using the phpmailer class from phpmailer.worxware.com to
>> send datatbase -populated emails to clients.
>>
>> At the moment I'm runninng PHP on Windows and using the built-in sendmail
>> equival
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Angus Mann wrote:
> I'm currently using the phpmailer class from phpmailer.worxware.com to
> send datatbase -populated emails to clients.
>
> At the moment I'm runninng PHP on Windows and using the built-in sendmail
> equivalent packaged with XAMPP. It use
From: Paul M Foster
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:02:18PM +1000, Angus Mann wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently using the phpmailer class from phpmailer.worxware.com
>> to send datatbase -populated emails to clients.
>>
>> At the moment I'm runninng PHP on Windows and using the built-in
>> sendmail equivale
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Angus Mann wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm currently using the phpmailer class from phpmailer.worxware.com to
> send datatbase -populated emails to clients.
>
> At the moment I'm runninng PHP on Windows and using the built-in sendmail
> equivalent packaged with XAMPP. I
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:02:18PM +1000, Angus Mann wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm currently using the phpmailer class from phpmailer.worxware.com to send
> datatbase -populated emails to clients.
>
> At the moment I'm runninng PHP on Windows and using the built-in sendmail
> equivalent packaged wi
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, kyle.smith wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> Recently i read this blog post about speed issues comparing PHP with
> ASP.net, please, read that and comment what you think about it:
> http://misfitgeek.com/blog/aspnet/php-versus-asp-net-ndash-windows-versu
> s-
-Original Message-
Recently i read this blog post about speed issues comparing PHP with
ASP.net, please, read that and comment what you think about it:
http://misfitgeek.com/blog/aspnet/php-versus-asp-net-ndash-windows-versu
s-linux-ndash-who-rsquo-s-the-fastest/
The big deal is: I don't
Nathan Rixham napsal(a):
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:44 +1100, Chris wrote:
PHP wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
I am wondering what you think is faster.
Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to
get fro
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:44 +1100, Chris wrote:
PHP wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
I am wondering what you think is faster.
Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to get from a
MySQL database.
A simp
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:44 +1100, Chris wrote:
> PHP wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
> >
> > I am wondering what you think is faster.
> >
> > Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to get from
> > a MySQL database.
> >
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 14:42 -0800, PHP wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
>
> I am wondering what you think is faster.
>
> Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to get from a
> MySQL database.
> A simple table will be display
PHP wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
I am wondering what you think is faster.
Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to get from a
MySQL database.
A simple table will be displayed for each record, the second table contains
r
PHP wrote:
Hi all,
I am seeking some knowledge, hopefully I explain this right.
I am wondering what you think is faster.
Say you have 1000 records from 2 different tables that you need to get from a
MySQL database.
A simple table will be displayed for each record, the second table contains
re
On Sat, March 31, 2007 3:49 pm, Don Don wrote:
> Hi all, i've got apache/php4 running on windows xp with good hardware
> configuration etc. However, the speed of execution of php pages is
> really slow. When testing on my local development machine it takes a
> few more seconds executing php files
2006 6:07 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Speed
Why not check it?
Try to query for the AVG() and get the result or query for the data
and do a loop in PHP to calculate the AVG. Check the time each
Takes.
My Money is that getting the value from SQL will be faster.
Sincerely
berber
Visit the Weber Sites
Why not check it?
Try to query for the AVG() and get the result or query for the data
and do a loop in PHP to calculate the AVG. Check the time each
Takes.
My Money is that getting the value from SQL will be faster.
Sincerely
berber
Visit the Weber Sites Today,
To see where PHP might tak
Assume that I save data about an object and it has 10.000 observations of
the object stored in a MySQL database. I want calculate the average value of
a column, is it faster done by using PHP on the result array or using the
MySQL function to do that?
MySQL.
You don't have to transfer all 10,00
ginal Message-
> From: Brent Baisley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 October 2005 19:35
> To: Alan Lord
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Speed/Efficiency Question: Large array into DB
>
> Sounds to me like you are trying to import data. In which
> c
Sounds to me like you are trying to import data. In which case it
would be best to create a text file and import it rather than putting
PHP in the middle.
But if you are going us to PHP, I would not do individual INSERTs.
The overhead will really slow things down with number of inserts you
Actually the data inserted in MYSQL is at every 2 seconds. i.e. 30 rows
in an hour. but we are making report on hourly basis. So i used this
method.
With best wishes
balwant
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I agree with Jasper here, you want to make it a point to optimize
your queries so that fewer trips are made to the database server. On
the topic of indexing, I'm curious as to how you did that and if your
using it as intended. In your query you are testing columns
`time`,`date` so you'll wa
balwant singh wrote:
Hi,
I have made a webpage in php which retrieves the data from a huge MYSQL
tables as below:-
$i=0;
while ($i<=23)
{
select a, b from table where hour(time)=$i and date='' order by desc
time limit 1;
$i++;
}
then i substract the current hour output from the last hour
Raditha, et al --
...and then Raditha Dissanayake said...
%
% Hello David,
Hi!
% looks like a bit of a tough one :-) guess you might be better off trying
Indeed.
% one of the qmail groups instead of this one. Sorry my own qmail
Oh, whoops! Yes, I'm already being a general pest on the qm
Hello David,
looks like a bit of a tough one :-) guess you might be better off trying
one of the qmail groups instead of this one. Sorry my own qmail
expertise isn't as good as it should be.
best regards
raditha
David T-G wrote:
jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello
jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% I recall someone (pardone me i don't save list mails) pointing out that
% the delay could actually be in generating the message rather than in the
Yep. Nope.
% sending. You are sending a customized message to each
Hello,
I recall someone (pardone me i don't save list mails) pointing out that
the delay could actually be in generating the message rather than in the
sending. You are sending a customized message to each user aren't you?
Would you be creating this message from what's in a mysql database or
s
Jabber, et al --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% having you tried ezmlm or to directly inject the message into the que?
Yes, I've tried qmail-inject. I got down to about 0.41s/msg which is
still terrible.
Thanks & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * There is too much anim
having you tried ezmlm or to directly inject the message into the que?
Javier Tacon wrote:
I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
SMTP to leave the mail. Do you have the same sendmail version in two
* Thus wrote David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> It seems to be the mail() call itself, because I can make a system call
> (system, exec, passthru) to just echo the current data and it rips
> through my list in nothin' flat. So how do I tune mail() to make it
> faster? Or do I need to give up and
Hi again, everyone --
I have a feeling that our problem is a lousy php.ini configuration. For
both module and CLI php we're using /usr/local/lib/php.ini, so I look in
there and I see
[mail function]
; For Win32 only.
SMTP = localhost
; For Win32 only.
sendmail_from = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javier --
...and then Javier Tacon said...
%
% May be the machine of your friend has a better network output than your
% machine :)
Heh :-) Hey, stranger things have happenned!
But check my other followup for an interesting twist.
Thanks again & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
May be the machine of your friend has a better network output than your
machine :)
-Mensaje original-
De: David T-G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miercoles, 27 de agosto de 2003 11:59
Para: PHP General list
CC: Javier Tacon
Asunto: Re: [PHP] speed of mail() on two servers
Javier, et al --
...and then Javier Tacon said...
%
% I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
% linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
Right. Only it doesn't make much sense, because qmail is FAST.
% SMTP to leave the mail. Do you hav
I think that may be 'problem' from sendmail .. mail() function under
linux only interacts with sendmail, it doesn't contact to the remote
SMTP to leave the mail. Do you have the same sendmail version in two
machines? You should compare both sendmail configuration and try to
check the speed from a
Read these mysql.com doc pages:
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/MySQL_indexes.html
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/CREATE_INDEX.html
--
Aaron Gould
Web Developer
Parts Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Erich Kolb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 27, 2003 3:56 PM
To: [EMAI
"John Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> I'm working on a large VB/Sql Server to Php/Postgresql conversion (approx.
> 60k lines of code).
First of all, VB is precompiled and PHP is not. This will already be
slower. So, you gonna need to create a logic that loads only the
necessary classes f
I like to see html highlighting, so I prefer first method, but for some
small snippets I also use echo
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
As Maxim pointed out a couple of days ago, this is just a matter of
nanosecs, it shouldn't be really noticeable from performance.
The fastest was to display non-PHP
I have not problem displaying variable - I do it all over my webpage, or how
to handle them. you may want to check out my post above that has a weblink
to the project, and a better explanation of exactly what I am doing.
"Ernest E Vogelsinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED
depends on my situation, but I use both techniques at times...
"Justin French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think the difference would be immeasurable, but to me, I think it would
> make sense if PHP didn't have to parse plain HTML...
>
> S
As Maxim pointed out a couple of days ago, this is just a matter of
nanosecs, it shouldn't be really noticeable from performance.
The fastest was to display non-PHP output is to escape from PHP and enter
plain HTML, like
$a = 'World';
?>
Hello !
Hello World!';
Note the single quote
I think the difference would be immeasurable, but to me, I think it would
make sense if PHP didn't have to parse plain HTML...
So IMHO,
/should/ be slightly quicker than
{$foo}"; ?>
The general consensus on the list seems to be "go with whichever one you are
more comfortable with, is more rea
Thanks for the help, guys . I appreciate it. And Bas, thanks for that link.
Interesting material for a novice PHP-user as myself.
Yves Vrancken
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> I am new to PHP and trying to implement some PHP and MySQL on my
website.
> My
> website has a lot of tables and inside some of those tables, I want to
> display information that is drawn out of the MySQL database using PHP.
I
> was
> wondering what goes faster:
>
> (A). Building the whole page
Hello,
You can also find something about your questions on:
http://www.php9.com/index.php/section/articles/name/PHP%20Guidelines
I had tested out by printing (repeated times):
1) echo ''.$k.': hallo '.$string.', dit is het'."\n";
2) echo "$k: hallo $string, dit is het"."\n";
3) ?>: hallo , dit i
I didn't expect it to make too much of a difference. Thank you for your
answer.
Yves Vrancken
"Justin French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I haven't noticed ANY performance hit by skipping in and out of PHP and
HTML
> when it suits me.
>
>
I haven't noticed ANY performance hit by skipping in and out of PHP and HTML
when it suits me.
I imagine there *might* be a slight performance hit if you were building a
LOT of table information with print or echo or printf, but the general
answer to your question is usually "whatever suits you b
thx
"Jason Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Thursday 18 July 2002 19:32, JJ Harrison wrote:
> > if I do this:
> >
> > if(validate($_POST['password'], $_POST['username']) != 0)
> > echo validate($_POST['password'], $_POST['username']);
> >
On Thursday 18 July 2002 19:32, JJ Harrison wrote:
> if I do this:
>
> if(validate($_POST['password'], $_POST['username']) != 0)
> echo validate($_POST['password'], $_POST['username']);
>
> will it execute the function twice or use the same result twice?
Function executes twice.
> would it be (s
At 6/21/2002, you wrote:
>PS> What about execution time in ms (with breakpoints)?
>PS> And is there way to measure MySQL query speed in ms?
>
>u can use microtime function
>
> function getMicrotime()
> {
> list($usec, $sec) = explode(" ",microtime());
> return ((float)$usec
Hi!
Thursday, June 20, 2002, 10:56:40 PM, you wrote:
PS> Is there any way to determine script's memory usage?
When you configure and compile you have some option
--with-memory-limit something like that and then add
\"%{mod_php_memory_usage}n\"
in you http.conf of Apache where you define how
> Is there any way to determine script's memory usage?
Depends on your web server. There is a way in apache. Rasmus answered this
same question for me a couple weeks ago, look through the archives. I saw an
option in IIS to put memory usage into the logs, that may work, too.
> What about executi
"Philipp Melab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, Ithought that embedding must be faster too. But I was confused
because
> in nearly every PHP-Beginner Tutorial/Book I've seen the Hello-World
> Example looks like this:
>
> echo "";
> echo ""
Yes, Ithought that embedding must be faster too. But I was confused because
in nearly every PHP-Beginner Tutorial/Book I've seen the Hello-World
Example looks like this:
";
echo "";
echo "...";
echo "";
echo "";
echo "Hello World!";
echo "";
echo "";
?>
funny, isn't it?
Yes
Leon Mergen wrote:
>
> "Philipp Melab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> - embedding PHP in HTML
>> - or printing HTML via PHP
>
> With embedding PHP in HTML, do you mean using server side includes or do
> you mean by having a .php file
"Philipp Melab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> - embedding PHP in HTML
> - or printing HTML via PHP
With embedding PHP in HTML, do you mean using server side includes or do you
mean by having a .php file and having a layout like this:
On Sunday 02 June 2002 02:12, Mark Charette wrote:
> From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> >Try comparing reading 10K rows from a DB using Perl and PHP would be a
> > more useful benchmark.
>
> ---
> When's the last time you wrote a Web page that needed 10K rows displayed?
Never.
Perha
From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Try comparing reading 10K rows from a DB using Perl and PHP would be a more
>useful benchmark.
---
When's the last time you wrote a Web page that needed 10K rows displayed?
Writing good _and relevant_ benchmarks is one of the more difficult things
to d
On Saturday 01 June 2002 06:20, Daniel Grace wrote:
> > > language would in many cases show PHP to be slower simply because it's
> > > looping code is slow? [...]
>
> It is typical usage, yes, but the conversation that gave me the idea to do
> the quick speed comparison was the idea that PHP can b
I agree that in most cases it makes more sence at seing the webpages per
second benchmark rather then a timing of some artibtrary benchmarks that for
example seeing how long it take to pick prime numbers. Since in the end it
matters how quickly you can get the data to the user, in case of perl
"Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sure, you could put it that way. When benchmarking something you really
> should benchmark stuff that you actually care about. Benchmark PHP
> spewing out a web page after making a couple of SQL
Sure, you could put it that way. When benchmarking something you really
should benchmark stuff that you actually care about. Benchmark PHP
spewing out a web page after making a couple of SQL queries, for example.
That's typical usage, so that is what you should benchmark. Very few PHP
scripts a
Does this mean that running a comparison benchmarks between PHP and any other
language would in many cases show PHP to be slower simply because it's
looping code is slow? Unless, timing is done on a speed of PHP being able to
spew out webpages via the webserver with a webserver benchmark tool s
Not very surprising. Perl's looping code has always ben faster than
PHP's. Highly iterative loops is really not what PHP is geared for. You
are not going to write a Mandelbrot algorithm in PHP. You write it in C
and drop in a super-quick extension into PHP and call mandelbrot().
-Rasmus
On F
]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Speed of Images from DB
> But that could be due to server capabilities of my ISP (if he has for
> example a high tech mysql-server and a relativly slow machine for
apache).
Probaly :-)
From this page:
> But that could be due to server capabilities of my ISP (if he has for
> example a high tech mysql-server and a relativly slow machine for apache).
Probaly :-)
From this page:
http://www.mysql.com/information/presentations/presentation-oscon2000-27
19/
You can read on section 'Gener
I did do that for a galery-script of myself. I don't have any numbers if
you'r looking for that but my personal impression was, that the picture
output from the mysql-db is actually faster than reading directly from disk.
But that could be due to server capabilities of my ISP (if he has for
exampl
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:12:05 -0700
Camille Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any benchmarks or proof of a speed difference between
> compiling PHP as an Apache APXS module, versus compiling it right into Apache?
>
> I'm going to be using it on a virtual webhost with 400 domain
So sprach »Aral Balkan« am 2001-07-11 um 14:59:44 -0400 :
> Personally, I couldn't be happier that Netscape won't be making browsers
Ah, so Microsoft also stopped making "operating systems"?
> anymore and I wish that trouble-some bug of an excuse for a browser would
> just go away :)
Well, Nets
>> Netscape is notoriously slug-like when it comes to loading large tables
(i.e. the output of phpinfo()).
A way around this is to break up large tables into numerous smaller ones (or
at least have one table at the top that displays something so that the user
doesn't think that things have gone a
age-
> From: Inércia Sensorial [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Speed of loding PHP pages
>
>
>
> No. It also depends on the internal engine used by the browser to
> 'contruct' the elements. On Windows plataforms, Netscape are slower to
> render
No. It also depends on the internal engine used by the browser to
'contruct' the elements. On Windows plataforms, Netscape are slower to
render cached pages. But IE has an advantage, it is built around some native
windows functionalities, one of the reasons it is faster. I don't know for
other
Are IE and Netscape both set the same as far as caching?
-
Brian S. Dunworth
Sr. Software Development Engineer
Oracle Database Administrator
The Printing House, Ltd.
(850) 875-1500 x225
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don wrote:
> Has anyone tries any test loading PHP pages into IE 5.x and Netscape
> 4.7x?
This is in no way related to PHP.
It's just the old Netscape taking lots of time for +rendering large
pages, especially with nested tables.
regards
Wagner
--
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact cha
Netscape is notoriously slug-like when it comes to loading large tables
(i.e. the output of phpinfo()).
- Tim
> As an experiment, I have a page that issues a phpinfo(). WIth I.E. 5.5,
> it takes about 3 seconds. With Netscape 4.77, it takes almost 20
> seconds.
--
PHP General Mailing List
So sprach Don Read am Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:06:53PM -0500:
> I have with 3.0.18 installed (to match customers), 'localhost' will use the
> /tmp/mysql.sock. This may have changed under 4.x.
Oh, yes, you are right! Thanks a lot - would have thought that I'd need to
say 'localhost:/tmp/mysql.sock
So sprach Don Read am Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:13:14PM -0500:
> define('DBHOST', 'localhost');
> // define('DBHOST', 'myhost.domain.com');
>
> define('QRY', 'select * from foo');
>
> $db=mysql_connect(DBHOST, DBUSER, DBPASS);
> if ( $db )
> testquery(QRY);
>
>
> ?>
>
> s
So sprach Christian Reiniger am Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:01:48PM +0200:
> run "ab" (comes with apache) on two scripts, one using method A
> repeatedly, the other using method B repeatedly
Thanks, will do.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (engl
So sprach Don Read am Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 02:14:41PM -0500:
> Yes, from my memory of the mysql list; AF_INET is 7% slower then AF_UNIX in
> data thru-put. Plus you have to add in the connection build & tear-down time.
That's exactly what I'd expect. Hmm, so I take it, I should also ask on the
On 16-Apr-01 Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket which
> should be used for communicating with MySQL.
>
> Now, when I connect thru a socket, is the datatransfer between PHP and MySQL
> faster than when I connect via a (loop-)ne
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 02:10, you wrote:
> So sprach Brian Clark am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:01:04PM -0400:
> > Ahhh, yes, I see that was stupid. Sorry, Alexander. :)
>
> Ah, thanks Joe for clearing up this confusion :))
>
> Now that this is sorted out: What might be the best way to do some
> be
So sprach Brian Clark am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:01:04PM -0400:
> Ahhh, yes, I see that was stupid. Sorry, Alexander. :)
Ah, thanks Joe for clearing up this confusion :))
Now that this is sorted out: What might be the best way to do some
benchmarking wrt. this? (Links are fine)
Alexander Skwa
So sprach Brian Clark am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 07:37:54PM -0400:
> > In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> > which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
>
> Yes. [string hostname [:port] [:/path/to/socket]
And again: There's no question in the sentence above
So sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] am Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:55:01AM +0200:
> I haven't to read the manual again. This is very well documented in the
> manual. If I remember correctly, I have put this lines into the PHP
> manual.
Pardon me, but where is it very well documented what I asked about?
Cer
Hi Joe,
@ 8:04:08 PM on 4/16/2001, Joe Sheble (Wizaerd) wrote:
...
>> > In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
^^
>> > which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
>>
>> Yes. [string hostname [:port] [:/path/to/socket]
>
> > Please read again what I wrote
>
> OK.
>
> > In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> > which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
>
> Yes. [string hostname [:port] [:/path/to/socket]
It's not a question. It is a statement prefecaing the real question
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:29:45AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Brian Clark am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 07:17:43PM -0400:
> > > In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> > > which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
> >
> > Yes, it's in the documentat
Hi Alexander,
@ 7:29:45 PM on 4/16/2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
...
> Please read again what I wrote
OK.
> In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
Yes. [string hostname [:port] [:/path/to/socket]
> Now, when
So sprach Brian Clark am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 07:17:43PM -0400:
> > In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> > which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
>
> Yes, it's in the documentation.
Please read again what I wrote
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote:
Hi Alexander,
@ 6:55:58 PM on 4/16/2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
...
> In a mysql_connect() it is possible to specify a path to the socket
> which should be used for communicating with MySQL.
Yes, it's in the documentation.
int mysql_connect ([string hostname [:port] [:/path/to/socket]
93 matches
Mail list logo
