On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:13 AM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> Seems strange that you are given a choice. My clients have been telling me
> that they are told to get the latest Acrobat Reader by Safari. Which they
> have done (again why allow a plugin that isn't supported get installed to
> begin
On 16 Nov 2011 at 12:13, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> Seems strange that you are given a choice. My clients have been telling me
> that they are told to get the latest Acrobat Reader by Safari. Which they have
> done (again why allow a plugin that isn't supported get installed to begin
> with) onl
> I have to say that I still really have no clue what you are talking about. Why
> would anyone with OS X want Acrobat Reader, when there is a perfectly
> good [1] application (note: application, not "feature") available that does
> the
> task just as well. And when the PDF shows up in Safari you
On 16 Nov 2011 at 00:43, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> And in conclusion; sorry, I get uppity after a long day LOL. It's as I already
> thought; the answer is NO. So here is what I will do for any of you looking
> for an answer and stumbling across my slight rant, I will detect if it is
> Safari 5.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:04:42 -0500, HallMarc Websites
sent:
On the face of it, if you are writing a PHP application for others to use,
*forcing* a particular behaviour on them (on *their* own machine) is
probably not a good idea. Why not let the user deal with this as
they see fit?
One can
And in conclusion; sorry, I get uppity after a long day LOL. It's as I already
thought; the answer is NO. So here is what I will do for any of you looking for
an answer and stumbling across my slight rant, I will detect if it is Safari
5.1.x and then just remove the view link and leave them with
> On the face of it, if you are writing a PHP application for others to use,
> *forcing* a particular behaviour on them (on *their* own machine) is
> probably not a good idea. Why not let the user deal with this as they see fit?
> One can go way too far trying to ensure a uniform experience among u
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:36:58 +, Ashley Sheridan
sent:
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:15 +0100, Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari
5.1.x do not support opening PDFs in the browser w
On 15 Nov 2011 at 22:36, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I always thought that opening a PDF inside the browser was a rubbish
> idea anyway. I've uninstalled Adobe Reader from my work machine now and
> the world is a happier place!
Well I'd rather it displays in the browser initially, which it does bu
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:15 +0100, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
> wrote:
> > I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari 5.1.x do
> > not support opening PDFs in the browser window with Acrobat Reader plugin
> > anymore. It is n
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM, HallMarc Websites
wrote:
> I'm sure everyone here is aware that the latest Mac OS and Safari 5.1.x do
> not support opening PDFs in the browser window with Acrobat Reader plugin
> anymore. It is now necessary to open them with Preview instead. My question
> is
11 matches
Mail list logo
