On 7/07/2011, at 5:50 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> On 7/5/2011 7:52 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>> And what do you use to cut down on spam in your in-box?
>
> This is completely off topic, but here it goes...
>
> When I received an email the other day from your mail server, I had created
> this
> crazy ass
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:30 PM, wrote:
> If you say I hijacked a spam thread , then shame on me. It will not happen
> again.
>
Do you have ANY IDEA how HARD I work to hand-craft my spam emails? Please do
not HIJACK them with your work-related, information-seeking drivel! Thank
you.
David
P.S.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Michelle Konzack <
linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net> wrote:
> Hello ad...@buskirkgraphics.com,
>
> since YOU ARE an ADMIN, you should real know abut,
> HOW TO WRITE A NEW MESSAGE and not to hijack a SPAM thread...
>
What?
--
Nephtali: A simple, flexible, fast, an
Okay,
Can you translate this lingo for me?
"since YOU ARE an ADMIN, you should real know abut, HOW TO WRITE A NEW
MESSAGE and not to hijack a SPAM thread..."
I thought to "abut" was the act of leaning for support? Maybe I am wrong.
I am on good advice that the word "real" is anything but a verb.
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:55 +0100, Peter Ford wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> >
> > Won't stop a bot worth it's salt either, hence the need for more complex
> > and confusing captchas. The best way to stop spam, is to use linguistic
> > testing on the content being offered, which protects
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
>
> Won't stop a bot worth it's salt either, hence the need for more complex
> and confusing captchas. The best way to stop spam, is to use linguistic
> testing on the content being offered, which protects against bot and
> human spammer alike.
>
> Thanks,
> Ash
> http:/
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 19:39 -0400, Gary wrote:
> I have always thought that by putting some simple, readable ttext into a
> graphic (eg.apple) and asking people to type it in a space, that would work,
> but that does not stop the humans..
>
> Gary
>
>
> "Philip Thompson" wrote in message
>
I have always thought that by putting some simple, readable ttext into a
graphic (eg.apple) and asking people to type it in a space, that would work,
but that does not stop the humans..
Gary
"Philip Thompson" wrote in message
news:9bf33458-4a91-4a23-bcb8-ebe13269f...@gmail.com...
> On Oct 20
On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Gary wrote:
NO I have not, I think my issue is I hate when I run across one, it
usually
takes me more than one try to actually figure out what the charactor
is, so
hence my disdain.
GAry
Here are some captchas:
"What's three minus two?"
"Which word is listed
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 23:41 +0200, Kim Madsen wrote:
> Gary wrote on 2009-10-20 22:55:
> > I like that idea,so in other words they have to get to the form from
> > another
> > page on the site, and you set a time limit for a minimum amount of time
> > they
> > spend on the page(5-10 seconds)?
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:31:53 -0400
"Gary" wrote:
> I have several sites that are getting hit with form spam. I have the
> script set up to capture the IP address so I know from where they
> come. I found a short script that is supposed to stop these IP
> addresses from accessing the form page,
Gary wrote on 2009-10-20 22:55:
I like that idea,so in other words they have to get to the form from another
page on the site, and you set a time limit for a minimum amount of time they
spend on the page(5-10 seconds)?
I don't set any time, just the session to prevent direct hits from a
spam
I like that idea,so in other words they have to get to the form from another
page on the site, and you set a time limit for a minimum amount of time they
spend on the page(5-10 seconds)?
Gary
"Kim Madsen" wrote in message
news:4ade206f.6030...@emax.dk...
> Hey Gary
>
> Gary wrote on 2009-10-
I have a honeypot in there already, another reason I think it is human spam
and not da bot.
Gary
"Bastien Koert" wrote in message
news:d7b6cab70910201337v5c18284aya022f48e13943...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:01 +02
Hey Gary
Gary wrote on 2009-10-20 20:31:
I have several sites that are getting hit with form spam. I have the script
set up to capture the IP address so I know from where they come.
I see that a lot suggested CAPTCHA, I don't like those either.
The IP solution will give you a constant main
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:01 +0200, John Black wrote:
>
>> Gary wrote:
>> > I believe they are human spammers as all the input fields are correctly
>> > filled out (phone in phone, address in address etc).
>> > As I said they are mostly the
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:01 +0200, John Black wrote:
> Gary wrote:
> > I believe they are human spammers as all the input fields are correctly
> > filled out (phone in phone, address in address etc).
> > As I said they are mostly the same IP.
> > Would it be better to include this script in the p
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:46 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:36 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
> >
> > That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from another
> > IP. I suggest you add a good c
PHP, ashita wa Java, sono ato sekai desu.
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:36:04 -0300
> From: tapi...@gmail.com
> To: gwp...@ptd.net
> CC: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Spam opinions please
>
> That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from anothe
Gary wrote:
I believe they are human spammers as all the input fields are correctly
filled out (phone in phone, address in address etc).
As I said they are mostly the same IP.
Would it be better to include this script in the processing script rather
than at the top of the page?
If it is fixe
I believe they are human spammers as all the input fields are correctly
filled out (phone in phone, address in address etc).
As I said they are mostly the same IP.
Would it be better to include this script in the processing script rather
than at the top of the page?
Gary
"Ashley Sheridan" wr
Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
I suggest you add a good captcha to the form and that way you can
avoid spam forever.
You can find a question/answer based CAPTCHA system here.
http://www.network-technologies.org/tiny.php?id=1
The system can be used to protect comment forms, email forms or act as a
bo
NO I have not, I think my issue is I hate when I run across one, it usually
takes me more than one try to actually figure out what the charactor is, so
hence my disdain.
GAry
"Paul M Foster" wrote in message
news:20091020184001.gi3...@quillandmouse.com...
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:31:53P
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:36 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
>
> That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from another
> IP. I suggest you add a good captcha to the form and that way you can
> avoid spam forever.
>
> Regards,
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:36 -0300, Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
> That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from another
> IP. I suggest you add a good captcha to the form and that way you can
> avoid spam forever.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonathan
Firstly, in_array() is used in his example,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0400, Gary wrote:
> I have several sites that are getting hit with form spam. I have the script
> set up to capture the IP address so I know from where they come. I found a
> short script that is supposed to stop these IP addresses from accessing the
> form pa
Thanks, and I understand, however I am trying to avoid the captcha if
possible. They are all or mostly coming from the same IP which is why I
thought this would help.
Gary
"Jonathan Tapicer" wrote in message
news:4603e2db0910201136q5e835193he4abbac75ef11...@mail.gmail.com...
That will work j
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:31 -0400, Gary wrote:
> I have several sites that are getting hit with form spam. I have the script
> set up to capture the IP address so I know from where they come. I found a
> short script that is supposed to stop these IP addresses from accessing the
> form page,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
> That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from another
> IP. I suggest you add a good captcha to the form and that way you can
> avoid spam forever.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Gary wrote:
That will work just for one IP, but they could spam you from another
IP. I suggest you add a good captcha to the form and that way you can
avoid spam forever.
Regards,
Jonathan
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Gary wrote:
> I have several sites that are getting hit with form spam. I have the s
2009/3/10 9el
>
> 2009/3/11 דניאל דנון
>
> > From time to time, I usually get a message of "earn money from home" or
> > things like that, and in the bottom, it says,
> >
> > "This email has been written and proved to be in compliance with the
> > recently established can-spam act law in US. We
---
Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com
--
20
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 19:37, דניאל דנון wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain, first,
> Why doesn't the usual PHP-MailingList-Footer appears?
It's SPAM. Not much we can do about it in an open forum,
unfortunately. Just ignore it.
> Second, What is the "out_of_the_list" email thing all about? Wil
On Thu, August 23, 2007 4:46 pm, Stut wrote:
> Instruct ICC wrote:
>>> Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was clear
>>> from my answer that I know what a socket is.
>> Sorry. You understood the concept but it wasn't clear to me that
>> you
>> understood about the socket. Sa
On Thu, August 23, 2007 2:49 pm, Instruct ICC wrote:
> Can server1 receive a web page form post from remoteAttacker,
> identify it as spam (or a DoS or DDoS attack),
> hand off the socket to multiple threads on multiple servers owned by
> server1's owner,
> return multiple responses to remoteAttack
Instruct ICC wrote:
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey
work your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wouldn't gmail thread it but still have 2 copies?
I could send email TO/CC/BCC the list to a specific folder, but I'd
still get the copy to me directl
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey work
your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wouldn't gmail thread it but still have 2 copies?
I could send email TO/CC/BCC the list to a specific folder, but I'd still
get the copy to me directly in another folder.
Instruct ICC wrote:
Why don't you and others just reply to the list? (I'm smiling when I
say this.)
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey work
your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was clea
Why don't you and others just reply to the list? (I'm smiling when I say
this.)
Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was clear from my
answer that I know what a socket is.
Sorry. You understood the concept but it wasn't clear to me that you
understood about the socket.
Instruct ICC wrote:
Not sure what you mean by "hand off the socket to multiple threads on
multiple servers". I think you're talking about detecting that a POST
is spam and passing that off to another machine to handle it.
Yes, that is what I meant. A socket is a lower level "object" that the
w
Not sure what you mean by "hand off the socket to multiple threads on
multiple servers". I think you're talking about detecting that a POST is
spam and passing that off to another machine to handle it.
Yes, that is what I meant. A socket is a lower level "object" that the web
server is using to
Instruct ICC wrote:
Can server1 receive a web page form post from remoteAttacker,
identify it as spam (or a DoS or DDoS attack),
hand off the socket to multiple threads on multiple servers owned by
server1's owner,
return multiple responses to remoteAttacker which normally would have
been a sin
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:14:54 -0600 (CST), "Richard Lynch" wrote:
> The Bad Guys are probably cramming your $subject and $from data with
> an ENTIRE eamil, so your mail() function is, in effect, and Open
> Relay. (That's very very very bad.)
>
> Example:
> Normal Input
> $subject = "Hi!";
>
> Bad
On Wed, November 8, 2006 7:06 am, clive wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Tue, November 7, 2006 12:42 am, Pieter du Toit wrote:
>
>>> What can i do?
>>
>> Disable the mail() function bit in your code that processes the FORM
>> submission.
>>
>
> you could also use a cool class I once found, googl
On Tue, November 7, 2006 4:22 pm, Bruce Cowin wrote:
> Yikes, so besides disabling the mail() function, how do you check for
> all that?
if (strstr($subject, "\n") || strstr($subject, "\r")) die("Spammer");
Same thing again for "$from" or any other variable going into your
headers.
In the body,
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, November 7, 2006 12:42 am, Pieter du Toit wrote:
What can i do?
Disable the mail() function bit in your code that processes the FORM
submission.
you could also use a cool class I once found, google/search for
phpmailer, it has a nice bit of code that allows y
Yikes, so besides disabling the mail() function, how do you check for all that?
Regards,
Bruce
>>> "Richard Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/11/2006 8:14 a.m. >>>
On Tue, November 7, 2006 12:42 am, Pieter du Toit wrote:
> I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a
> submission
>
On Tue, November 7, 2006 12:42 am, Pieter du Toit wrote:
> I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a
> submission
> form for an event.
>
> I keep on getting random mail from this form.
>
> I have even disabled the submit button on the form, but keep on
> getting it.
>
> What c
> -Original Message-
> From: Pieter du Toit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:43 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Spam using email on website
>
> Hi guys
>
> I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a submission
> form f
> -Original Message-
> From: Pieter du Toit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:43 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Spam using email on website
>
> Hi guys
>
> I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a submission
> form f
Pieter du Toit wrote:
Hi guys
I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a submission
form for an event.
I keep on getting random mail from this form.
I have even disabled the submit button on the form, but keep on getting it.
What can i do?
you could use a CAPTCHA ima
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 02:20 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:42 +0200, Pieter du Toit wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a submission
> > form for an event.
> >
> > I keep on getting random mail from this form.
> >
>
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:42 +0200, Pieter du Toit wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a website that is being crawled or whatever and i have a submission
> form for an event.
>
> I keep on getting random mail from this form.
>
> I have even disabled the submit button on the form, but keep on getting it
This list are not moderated, but Derick has taken care of this
particular problem :)
Edin
Xuefer wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject of the message: [PHP] Re: anyone get corrupted response with
> php-fcgi when zlib.output_compression=On?
> Recipient of the message: "PHP LIST"
>
John Nichel wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
AdamT wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0500, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, this time it took just 11 days to get my first bit of spam from
this mailing list.
F
Richard Lynch wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
AdamT wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0500, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, this time it took just 11 days to get my first bit of spam from
this mailing list.
Folks, I think the OP
Jochem Maas wrote:
> AdamT wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0500, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Well, this time it took just 11 days to get my first bit of spam from
>>>this mailing list.
Folks, I think the OP set up a
AdamT wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0500, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, this time it took just 11 days to get my first bit of spam from
this mailing list.
Do you mean the spam was from php-general@lists.php.net ?
Or do you mean that you know for sure that your address was harvested
fr
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0500, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, this time it took just 11 days to get my first bit of spam from
> this mailing list.
>
Do you mean the spam was from php-general@lists.php.net ?
Or do you mean that you know for sure that your address was harvested
from th
Hello bob,
Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 4:11:47 PM, you wrote:
b> I am most surprised that a list like this would be so open to
b> Spiders and other creepie crawlies. Other PHP mailing lists are
b> fine, why can't the original and best one be one of them ?
I can't see how any list at all that display
Well, you're entitled to your opinion, of course; but (a) I clearly put
[Off] in the subject, and (b) this is something that only works for PHP
sites, so it's not completely irrelevant. My experience has been that
it works great, as I proved, and that took only 2 weeks. I'm sure I'm
not the onl
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:57:43 -0800, Brian Dunning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you're entitled to your opinion, of course; but (a) I clearly put
> [Off] in the subject
Next time try the standard [OT] label instead.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://gdconsultants.com/
http://de
Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote John Holmes:
A later example implements ArrayAccess and IteratorAggregate and then
says you can use count($A), but it doesn't work for my tests. It always
returns 1.
That example i think is minor mistake. As noted in the example
above you have to call pass ->getIt
* Thus wrote Curt Zirzow:
> * Thus wrote John Holmes:
> >
> > A later example implements ArrayAccess and IteratorAggregate and then
> > says you can use count($A), but it doesn't work for my tests. It always
> > returns 1.
>
> That example i think is minor mistake. As noted in the example
> abo
* Thus wrote John Holmes:
>
> A later example implements ArrayAccess and IteratorAggregate and then
> says you can use count($A), but it doesn't work for my tests. It always
> returns 1.
That example i think is minor mistake. As noted in the example
above you have to call pass ->getIterator() t
Kevin Waterson wrote:
Is anyone using SPL iterators out there? Any examples you'd like to share
that you find useful? Iterating through databases or large files, etc? Just
curious what people are using this for before I write some stuff myself. :)
I am using them in the current script I am writi
Merlin wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on a spam filter for email forms. To improve it it would be
great to compare 2 text and to find out how equal they are.
Is there a function in php wich compares 2 text and returns a percentage
of equality?
The system allready checks for spam keywords, but th
* Thus wrote Ryan A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
> ...
> This was the message i got:
>
> Do not forward or sell my information. Remove me from your distribution
> list. If anymore emails come from this address they will be forwarded to
> the FTC and to the department that deals with these type
I remember a how to on this from linuxsecurity about 6 months ago-- try
a search there. justin
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Jason Soza
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Spam Bots/E-mail Addys
On
sn't a new idea, but I'm assuming it's more secure than
just keeping a mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] link around.
Thanks,
Jason Soza
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Dallas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:23 am
Subject: Re: [PHP] Spam Bots/E-mail Ad
Analysis & Solutions wrote:
> If you don't need the address to be hyperlinkable, you can put the user, @
> and domain in different table cells. Or even put each letter in a
> separate cell. Could even set the border, cellspacing and cellpadding to
> 0 to make it not look like a table.
Assu
On Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 6:10:35 PM, you wrote:
> If I have a site that stores information about people in a database,
> including e-mail addresses, and that information is only viewable when
> called via a user-specific variable, i.e. their alias, can spambots
> still harvest those e-mail
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:10:35AM -0800, Jason Soza wrote:
>
> users.php?alias=johnsmith - I guess my main question is, can spambots
> follow those types of links, get the resulting page, and harvest the
> address off that?
No reason why not.
> Is there any way to combat this? Any PHP scri
So the end justifies the means is what you are saying. Using an example
of someone who got what they wanted through devious and dishonest
actions as a justification for your actions is a demonstration of your
warped ideas of what is ok and what is not.
Spammers do not get it. They're only out for
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, vins wrote:
> SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM
*plonk*
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
WHEN DOES IT GET TO YOUR BRAIN that i'm not American..
grammatica hulp is niet nodig, ik spreek *echt* nederlands ;)
bvr.
>oh dam
>and American that can actually speak some Traditional Afrikaans that makes
>absolutely no sense.
>listen check the south african afrikaans gramma website
well, lets just clasify that as a dis to your name
"Caspar Kennerdale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> And a message for bvr and caspe kennerdale.
> You are obviousely Americans
>
> setting the record straight- this is a huge assumption-
And a message for bvr and caspe kennerdale.
You are obviousely Americans
setting the record straight- this is a huge assumption- and I'm not
american, and you didnt even spell my name correctly!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
oh dam
and American that can actually speak some Traditional Afrikaans that makes
absolutely no sense.
listen check the south african afrikaans gramma website before trying to
message me with shit like that
"Bvr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, pretty obvious .. you must have figured that from the .NL
extension to my e-mail address..
Lemme guess, .ZA that's Japan nie waar nie ??
You are obviously not an expert so don't make us filthen this list with
(anti-)SPAM messages and stupid off-topic definitions.
THANKS!
bvr.
Vins wro
> And then the spammers can use NNTP again. I think it goes both ways.
> NNTP <> LIST
>
> A good spam filter (blacklist) would be a good option.
Yeah thats what i said
--
Jon Farmer
Systems Programmer, Entanet www.enta.net
Tel 01952 428969 Mob 07763 620378
PGP Key available, send blank email t
>> ...but then what do you do about the people who have legitimate
questions
>> who don't want to subscribe to the list? This is a fairly high
traffic
list
>> and not everyone wants that much mail coming at them just to have the
>> occasional one-off question answered.
>See as this list is mirro
> ...but then what do you do about the people who have legitimate questions
> who don't want to subscribe to the list? This is a fairly high traffic
list
> and not everyone wants that much mail coming at them just to have the
> occasional one-off question answered.
See as this list is mirrored t
...but then what do you do about the people who have legitimate questions
who don't want to subscribe to the list? This is a fairly high traffic list
and not everyone wants that much mail coming at them just to have the
occasional one-off question answered.
Sam Masiello
Software Quality Assuran
84 matches
Mail list logo
