Hi,
From my personal recent experience, I can tell you that processing a lot of
echo's thru classes is a heck of a lot slower than just doing it the normal
way. Although I wouldn't have done this particular project any other way, I
do with that I could get it to display faster. Its not a
"Joe Stump" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sure ...
>
> I'm of the belief that OOP (in PHP anyways) has great use for core
> libraries. Core libraries, by their nature, generally don't output HTML.
> It's a core libraries job to separate logic and presentation. How po
rsions of our
> online catalog.
>
> --Joe
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:21 AM
> To: 'Joe Stump'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
>
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
> One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT
> EVERYTHING BELONGS IN
> OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output
> HTML - you've
> skipped a few chapters in y
> One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT
> EVERYTHING BELONGS IN
> OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output
> HTML - you've
> skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books.
Joe,
I am curious about this opinion, could you elaborate a bit, please? I am not
an OO
In my experience OOP isn't any faster/slower. I've used it on sites that get
30M hits a month; so if it's gonna break I'd have seen it by now.
One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT EVERYTHING BELONGS IN
OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output HTML - you've
skippe
6 matches
Mail list logo
