On 3/27/07, Travis Doherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jake Gardner wrote:
> He said if you run the /script/ itself 1000 times, not a loop with 1000
> iterations. This is quite possible; I am fairly certain there are
> websites
> out there that get accessed well over 1000 times a minute, yes?
>
>
Jake Gardner wrote:
> He said if you run the /script/ itself 1000 times, not a loop with 1000
> iterations. This is quite possible; I am fairly certain there are
> websites
> out there that get accessed well over 1000 times a minute, yes?
>
> So every minute, that website is saving a total of 2.6
He said if you run the /script/ itself 1000 times, not a loop with 1000
iterations. This is quite possible; I am fairly certain there are websites
out there that get accessed well over 1000 times a minute, yes?
So every minute, that website is saving a total of 2.6 seconds to do...
whatever it is
On Sat, March 24, 2007 4:52 am, Tijnema ! wrote:
>> That means that at 1000 iterations, you are "saving" how much time?
>>
>> .00026 seconds?
>> .4 seconds?
>>
>> Puhleaze.
>
> Well, if you execute this script 1000 times, you would get a
> difference of 2.6 seconds?
> But if every microseconds
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 14:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 2:24 PM -0400 3/24/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 10:21 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >> At 7:47 PM -0500 3/23/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >> >Folks:
> >> >
> >> >How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough iterations
At 2:24 PM -0400 3/24/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 10:21 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:47 PM -0500 3/23/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
>Folks:
>
>How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough iterations
>that this is even significant?
>
>Write the code that makes sens
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 10:21 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 7:47 PM -0500 3/23/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >Folks:
> >
> >How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough iterations
> >that this is even significant?
> >
> >Write the code that makes sense.
> >
> >Optimize the biggest bottleneck unt
At 7:47 PM -0500 3/23/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
Folks:
How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough iterations
that this is even significant?
Write the code that makes sense.
Optimize the biggest bottleneck until performance is acceptable.
Absolutely -- the time we take discussi
Hi,
I'm using so much FOR loops in my code, after seeing discussion I try to test.
My findigs it was giving %2 to %10 percent performance boost.
So ?
My recent template addon to this code cost me around %5 to %10 percent of
total page process..
I think It was nice trade off.
Thank you guys.
On 3/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, March 23, 2007 7:54 pm, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Folks:
>>
>> How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough
>> iterations
>> that this is even significant?
>>
>> Write the c
On Fri, March 23, 2007 7:54 pm, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Folks:
>>
>> How often do you use a loop of any kind in PHP with enough
>> iterations
>> that this is even significant?
>>
>> Write the code that makes sense.
>>
>> Optimize the biggest bottle
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 01:54 +0100, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, March 22, 2007 5:14 pm, Tijnema ! wrote:
> > > On 3/22/07, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Your test isn't exactly fair. The for loop has no statements in it,
> > >>
On 3/24/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, March 22, 2007 5:14 pm, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Your test isn't exactly fair. The for loop has no statements in it,
>> and
>> the while loop has one. Your tests show while as approx 7% f
On Thu, March 22, 2007 5:14 pm, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Your test isn't exactly fair. The for loop has no statements in it,
>> and
>> the while loop has one. Your tests show while as approx 7% faster,
>> while
>> a modified test shows an approximate
On 3/23/07, Mario Guenterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:24:45AM -0500, Travis Doherty wrote:
> After multiple runs I see that the for pre-increment loop is fastest.
> Note that the while loop with a post-increment runs once more than with
> a pre-increment.
>
> Everyti
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:24:45AM -0500, Travis Doherty wrote:
> After multiple runs I see that the for pre-increment loop is fastest.
> Note that the while loop with a post-increment runs once more than with
> a pre-increment.
>
> Everytime I run, the results are *very* different, though still
Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/22/07, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Your test isn't exactly fair. The for loop has no statements in it, and
>> the while loop has one. Your tests show while as approx 7% faster, while
>> a modified test shows an approximate 30% speed improvement:
>>
>> Do th
On 3/22/07, Jon Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your test isn't exactly fair. The for loop has no statements in it, and
the while loop has one. Your tests show while as approx 7% faster, while
a modified test shows an approximate 30% speed improvement:
Do this:
for ($i=0;$i<1000;$i++) {
On 3/22/07, Jake McHenry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does this help?
http://www.php.lt/benchmark/phpbench.php
Jake
Well, there wasn't a test between For and While, so i did it myself,
and i'm quite confused about the result.
I let PHP count from 0 to 1 on my 1ghz AMD Athlon.
While did
does this help?
http://www.php.lt/benchmark/phpbench.php
Jake
> -Original Message-
> From: Tijnema ! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 4:38 PM
> To: PHP
> Subject: [PHP] Performance: While or For loop
>
> Hi,
>
> Does somebody has benchmarks of what is fast
20 matches
Mail list logo
