Jason Barnett wrote:
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Justin,
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 6:27:20 PM, you wrote:
JP> I also have no idea what Agent 2 is
It's a Windows based news-reader (the free version is called
FreeAgent) - think tin with knobs on.
Oh and to the OP: Agent 2 is OUT and available,
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Justin,
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 6:27:20 PM, you wrote:
JP> I also have no idea what Agent 2 is
It's a Windows based news-reader (the free version is called
FreeAgent) - think tin with knobs on.
Oh and to the OP: Agent 2 is OUT and available, has been for a short
-{ Rene Brehmer }- wrote:
At 00:59 30-03-2004, Justin Patrin wrote:
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Justin,
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 12:42:12 AM, you wrote:
JP> P.S. Why do a lot of people email off list? I get doubles.
They are too lazy to remove your email when doing a reply-to-all
basically.
Mor
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:10, Justin Palmer wrote:
> Hey listen Rob,
>
> I was not trying to give you a hard time (or split hairs). In fact I am
> grateful for your answer and your want to explain even more in depth
> than some of the one line answers on the list. The reason that I was
> splittin
At 00:59 30-03-2004, Justin Patrin wrote:
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Justin,
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 12:42:12 AM, you wrote:
JP> P.S. Why do a lot of people email off list? I get doubles.
They are too lazy to remove your email when doing a reply-to-all
basically.
More people should use the newsg
Simple: the list is setup to send replies in private per default. If you
just hit reply it will go in private. So we hit "reply to all" and the
reply goes private and on list ... thus you get doubles...
My system sometimes confuses the private replies with the list mail, and
puts both in the li
At 23:40 29-03-2004, Justin Palmer wrote:
Rene, no need to email me personally, please keep it on list.
Sorry 'bout that ... I just hit Ctrl+R, and it goes private and on list...
force of habit, since this list is set to reply in private...
If you have worked with Java then you should know the tr
offend you and offend the list (if I did so).
My apologies,
Justin Palmer
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP-General
Subject: RE: [PHP] Namespaces in PHP
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:42, Jus
--- Frank Tudor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pay attention people: 'Rob' = greatest PHP programmer on planet. IMHO
>
> So bask in the 'excellent' and 'free' knowledge he gives.
Indeed, Robert has consistently given his free time to help people with
their PHP problems. Hopefully his time won't be
--- Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:42, Justin Palmer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just don't see it as a "namespace ideology", it is just how objects
> > work. I know that he knows that it is encapsulation. My point being
> > that it should not really be calle
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:42, Justin Palmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just don't see it as a "namespace ideology", it is just how objects
> work. I know that he knows that it is encapsulation. My point being
> that it should not really be called that because it has nothing really
> to do with namespaces
> Richard Davey wrote:
>
>> Hello Justin,
>>
>> Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 12:42:12 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> JP> P.S. Why do a lot of people email off list? I get doubles.
>>
>> They are too lazy to remove your email when doing a reply-to-all
>> basically.
>>
>
There is ways though to configure mailman
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello Justin,
Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 12:42:12 AM, you wrote:
JP> P.S. Why do a lot of people email off list? I get doubles.
They are too lazy to remove your email when doing a reply-to-all
basically.
More people should use the newsgroupsit makes things so much simple
TECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Namespaces in PHP
--- Justin Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your statement of:
>
> > PHP doesn't support namespaces; however, functions defined within a
> > class definition are essentially conform to namespace ideology since
> &
--- Justin Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your statement of:
>
> > PHP doesn't support namespaces; however, functions defined within
> > a class definition are essentially conform to namespace ideology
> > since the function would need to be defined twice in the same class
> > to cause an col
ustin Palmer
IT Administrator
___
Council for Educational Travel, USA
1403 View Avenue
Centralia, WA 98531
USA
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Namespaces in PHP
Chris Shiflett wrote:
--- Justin Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did not think that PHP supported namespaces?
It doesn't.
There are lots of other things, of course. One method of learning
about this would be to take every OO term (encapsulation,
namespacing, etc.) and find a really good
___
Council for Educational Travel, USA
1403 View Avenue
Centralia, WA 98531
USA
-Original Message-
From: -{ Rene Brehmer }- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Namespaces in PHP
PHP don't, it don't even have vari
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 17:01, Justin Palmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did not think that PHP supported namespaces? I would love to see it
> if it is possible. What sparked my interest was this post:
>
> http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.general&article=181728
>
>
> There are lots of other thi
--- Justin Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did not think that PHP supported namespaces?
It doesn't.
>
> There are lots of other things, of course. One method of learning
> about this would be to take every OO term (encapsulation,
> namespacing, etc.) and find a really good explanation of t
20 matches
Mail list logo
