Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:24, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> This way multiple inheritance is available for those that legitimately need
>> it [...]
>
> Could you by any chance provide an example where multiple inheritance
> would be required? To be honest, I've never really see
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:24, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> This way multiple inheritance is available for those that legitimately need
> it [...]
Could you by any chance provide an example where multiple inheritance
would be required? To be honest, I've never really seen a use for it,
but that may be
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Monday 28 December 2009 9:45:03 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Okay so PHP designers explicitly decided against multiple inheritances,
>> but aren't there legitimate needs for multiple inheritance in OOP?
>>
>> For example, consider the following three classes (A,
On Monday 28 December 2009 9:45:03 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Okay so PHP designers explicitly decided against multiple inheritances,
> but aren't there legitimate needs for multiple inheritance in OOP?
>
> For example, consider the following three classes (A,B,C) with the
> following prop
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Friday 25 December 2009 8:02:06 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>> Hello PHPers,
>>
>> I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
>> need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
>> imperfection...or so they say.
>>
>> Well, I'm usi
On Friday 25 December 2009 8:02:06 pm Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello PHPers,
>
> I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
> need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
> imperfection...or so they say.
>
> Well, I'm using a framework (Codeigniter), a
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello PHPers,
>
> I've learned that php doesn't support multiple inheritance, b/c if you
> need multiple inheritance usually it is a sign you've got a design
> imperfection...or so they say.
>
> Well, I'm using a framework (Codeigniter), and i'm extending the core
> librarie
Thanks Nathan, I had already done that using the Objects of the 2 classes as
shown by you in the example 1.
but there are one thing in that.
If i create the Objects i cannot access the Protected Data from teh parent
classes.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM, chetan rane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Dose anyone know how to implement multiple inheritance in PHP 5.
> Interfaces dosent work . I have already Tried it.
the idea in a single inheritance language is to implement
'multiple inheritance' in the follo
2008. 02. 27, szerda keltezéssel 22.35-kor chetan rane ezt írta:
> Hi All
>
> Dose anyone know how to implement multiple inheritance in PHP 5.
> Interfaces dosent work . I have already Tried it.
>
there is no multiple inheritance in php5, but multiple interfaces do
work, I have already tried tha
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM, chetan rane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Dose anyone know how to implement multiple inheritance in PHP 5.
> Interfaces dosent work . I have already Tried it.
Like Java, PHP5 doesn't have multiple inheritance. It does have
multiple interfaces, so
Greg Beaver wrote:
> Greg Donald wrote:
>> with it, but I will go grab a PEAR module if it fits my needs. Code
>> re-use may be the only redeeming quality of OO programming, and
>> honestly I can re-use your code from a non-OO include file just as
>> easily.
>
> yep, unless the function names happe
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:27:12 -0600, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but in the case of the Linux kernel there's no programming
> language that is both OO and close enough to the metal to program a
> kernel (other than maybe Forth??).
C++, being a superset of C, would certainly be 'clo
Please note that I am specifically *not* weighing in on the OO vs.
procedural religious war, but only wanted to make a couple of small
comments. :)
Richard Lynch wrote:
> I spend a *LOT* more time, digging through endless class files, of
> what are essentially name-spaces of singleton "objects" tr
On Dec 10, 2004, at 3:50 PM, Greg Donald wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:32:30 -0800 (PST), Richard Lynch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I do is not use classes.
I agree.
Some of the worst arguments for OO I've heard recently:
"OO programming lets you organize your code better."
So what you're sayi
On Dec 10, 2004, at 4:17 PM, Greg Beaver wrote:
The biggest hogs in php programming are:
1) unnecessary images and animated crap/unnecessary javascript
2) terrible database usage
3) too much complexity in the design
I would like to add
0) Compilation. Many scripts take longer to compile than execut
gle.com );
Archives::getUri( http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general );
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:08 AM
To: 'PHP General'
Subject: RE: [PHP] Multiple Inheritance
Richard,
Thank you for that.
I've been writing PHP apps
> Have you ever written a project and then moved to the next noticing that
> you are doing some of the same things from last project (connecting to a
> database, reading a file, writing to a file, etc...)?
Not quite the same thing.
When it is exactly the same thing, I just copy & paste the code.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:17:53 -0500, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep, unless the function names happen to conflict with ones you've
> already written.
for file in *.php; do
cp $file $file.tmp
sed -e "s/bad/good/g" $file.tmp >$file
rm $file.tmp
done
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engi
Greg Donald wrote:
with it, but I will go grab a PEAR module if it fits my needs. Code
re-use may be the only redeeming quality of OO programming, and
honestly I can re-use your code from a non-OO include file just as
easily.
yep, unless the function names happen to conflict with ones you've
alrea
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:04:49 -0800, Justin Palmer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if you were to build an application around the MySQL database. You
> have just finished the project and you are taking it to your boss. You
> get there and then your boss says, "you know what I would rather use
>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:32:30 -0800 (PST), Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What I do is not use classes.
I agree.
Some of the worst arguments for OO I've heard recently:
"OO programming lets you organize your code better."
So what you're saying is that you're not capable of organizing
> What are some of the things you guys do to get around the
> fact that classes in php4 can't do multiple inheritance?
What I do is not use classes.
At all.
:-)
As a Lisp programmer of over a decade, I think I can safely say I am an OO
proponent.
Yet, every time I sit down to program a web app
: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:33 AM
To: Chris Boget
Cc: PHP General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Multiple Inheritance
> What are some of the things you guys do to get around the fact that
> classes in php4 can't do multiple inheritance?
What I do is not
Richard,
Thank you for that.
I've been writing PHP apps for a while now but would not concider myself an
"expert". I just enjoy doing it and I know a fair bit about what I'm doing.
One thing I never quite got into (with PHP) is OO. Why - because nothing I
ever did really seemed to make sense as O
Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:33 AM
To: Chris Boget
Cc: PHP General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Multiple Inheritance
> What are some of the things you guys do to get around the fact that
> classes in php4 can't do multiple inheritance?
What I do is not
26 matches
Mail list logo
