--- Sid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many people ask me if ASP.net is faster than PHP. I know for a fact
> that it is (because PHP is not optimized).
Don't be so easily fooled by hollow terms.
Go here:
http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm
Start with the slide entitled Benc
Can't resist trowing in my 0.02 either:
As dan pointed out it's so much faster to do things in php. When you
take into consideration the fact that code on windows never work the
way it's supposed you are saving a lot of man hours.
Second point worth mentioning is that a given languages/framewo
> OMG! PHP
> is slower. The difference is .035 seconds. Does this matter? Who is
> asking which is faster? Why do they care? Are they looking for a reason
> to choose one technology over another?
I totally agree with you, but I find it funny that many times when
talking to people they
> Apparently if you read the terms of agreement when installing .NET
> you can't publish your benchmarking results without their
> permission.
Is Micro$oft©® scared of being beaten? Now I am going to get the benchmarking results
by hook or crook! Now I HATE M$. aahh!!
I've seen a comparison
[snip]
Many people ask me if ASP.net is faster than PHP. I know for a fact that
it is (because PHP is not optimized).
But then what about optimized PHP and compiled ASP.net. This would be a
fairer comparison in my opinion. Anyone seen any benchmarks of this? If
so please let me know as I would not
Apparently if you read the terms of agreement when installing .NET you can't
publish your benchmarking results without their permission.
just a thought.
would be interesting to see comparison, and maybe also JSP, cold fusion
-Original Message-
From: Sid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mo
6 matches
Mail list logo
