On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:25:01 +0100, Bix wrote:
>My file is currently 1200 lines long and consist of 450 lines of case
>statements and then the rest are functions.
Obviously there are ways to optimize the code for speed. However, as
with many optimizations, there are trade offs... One way to do a
[snip]
include("common_functions.php");
switch($action)
case "do this":
include("do_this_funcs.php");
.
function(s) called
break;
case "do that":
include("do_that_funcs.php");
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 June 2003 13:36
>
> [snip]
> > If I did this, would it make a huge amount of difference?
>
> I'm almost certain it WOULD make a difference, but apart from the
> execution time, I can't think of anything worse
[snip]
On a similar note, does php 'look at' all the functions even if not
used? I can understand it reads them, but does it involve any parsing
time?
[/snip]
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.include.php has a wealth of
information, including important notes about security of included files.
On a similar note, does php 'look at' all the functions even if not used? I
can understand it reads them, but does it involve any parsing time?
Bix.
"Jay Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> If I did this, would it make a huge amount of difference?
I'm
[snip]
> If I did this, would it make a huge amount of difference?
I'm almost certain it WOULD make a difference, but apart from the
execution time, I can't think of anything worse than scrolling through
2000 lines of code looking for the section I'm after.
Or, even if *I* could find my way aroun
on 05/06/03 7:25 PM, Bix ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If I did this, would it make a huge amount of difference?
I'm almost certain it WOULD make a difference, but apart from the execution
time, I can't think of anything worse than scrolling through 2000 lines of
code looking for the section I'm a
7 matches
Mail list logo
