Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 15 Apr 2012, at 19:41, Lester Caine wrote: > Stuart Dallas wrote: >>> Stuart Dallas wrote: >> No code duplication but clear separation between static and >> instantiated usage. However, this is not the best way to structure this >> code IMO. The better option would be to extra

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Lester Caine
Stuart Dallas wrote: Stuart Dallas wrote: >> No code duplication but clear separation between static and instantiated usage. However, this is not the best way to structure this code IMO. The better option would be to extract the static parts into a separate class, and use that new class from

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 15 Apr 2012, at 15:02, Lester Caine wrote: > Stuart Dallas wrote: >> No code duplication but clear separation between static and instantiated >> usage. However, this is not the best way to structure this code IMO. The >> better option would be to extract the static parts into a separate class

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Lester Caine
Stuart Dallas wrote: No code duplication but clear separation between static and instantiated usage. However, this is not the best way to structure this code IMO. The better option would be to extract the static parts into a separate class, and use that new class from the instantiated version.

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 15 Apr 2012, at 13:30, Lester Caine wrote: > Stuart Dallas wrote: >> On 15 Apr 2012, at 11:44, Lester Caine wrote: >> >>> I've got a machine set up with PHP5.4 and left the strict errors showing, >>> and I'm falling at the first hurdle :) >>> >>> The functions for generating URL's are used b

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Lester Caine
Stuart Dallas wrote: On 15 Apr 2012, at 11:44, Lester Caine wrote: I've got a machine set up with PHP5.4 and left the strict errors showing, and I'm falling at the first hurdle :) The functions for generating URL's are used both statically and as part of the class. STRICT complains because t

Re: [PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Stuart Dallas
On 15 Apr 2012, at 11:44, Lester Caine wrote: > I've got a machine set up with PHP5.4 and left the strict errors showing, and > I'm falling at the first hurdle :) > > The functions for generating URL's are used both statically and as part of > the class. STRICT complains because they are not ma

[PHP] strict nannying ...

2012-04-15 Thread Lester Caine
OK I've got a machine set up with PHP5.4 and left the strict errors showing, and I'm falling at the first hurdle :) The functions for generating URL's are used both statically and as part of the class. STRICT complains because they are not marked 'static' ( and I'm assuming 'public static' i