On Thu, 07 May 2009 09:33:00 -0400, f...@thefsb.org (Tom Worster) wrote:
>On 5/6/09 9:31 PM, "Clancy" wrote:
>
>> I can understand your reluctance to disregard your mother's advice, but
>> unfortunately she
>> had been brainwashed to accept the dogma of the day.
>
>actually, i don't believe so. s
you know...
interesting that goto can be found in code!!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:36 AM
To: Tom Worster
Cc: Clancy; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] speaking of control structures...
On Thu, 2009
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 09:33 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
On 5/6/09 9:31 PM, "Clancy" wrote:
I can understand your reluctance to disregard your mother's advice, but
unfortunately she
had been brainwashed to accept the dogma of the day.
actually, i don't believe so. she did
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 09:33 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 5/6/09 9:31 PM, "Clancy" wrote:
>
> > I can understand your reluctance to disregard your mother's advice, but
> > unfortunately she
> > had been brainwashed to accept the dogma of the day.
>
> actually, i don't believe so. she did numeri
On 5/6/09 9:31 PM, "Clancy" wrote:
> I can understand your reluctance to disregard your mother's advice, but
> unfortunately she
> had been brainwashed to accept the dogma of the day.
actually, i don't believe so. she did numerical work so she continued using
fortran and therefore gotos for the
On Wed, 06 May 2009 08:54:14 -0400, f...@thefsb.org (Tom Worster) wrote:
...
>clancy, i can't argue with you. my desired usage of break is really just a
>cover-up for a goto. i know.
>
>it makes no logical sense but i think i'd sooner adopt oop than gotos. my
>mom taught me to program back in
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:41 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
On 5/6/09 7:05 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
That seems like an abuse of exceptions. But then we're already abusing
loops. I just don't think one could say it's the proper way to do it :)
i don't have a lot of intere
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:23 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
Tom Worster wrote:
> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> break out of, e.g.
>
>>
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> >>> Tom Worster wrote:
> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> break out of, e.g.
> >>>
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 22:23 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> >> Tom Worster wrote:
> >>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> >>> break out of, e.g.
> >>
> >> As Maarten pointed out yo
Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
>>> Tom Worster wrote:
there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
break out of, e.g.
>>> As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative i
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
>>> break out of, e.g.
>>
>> As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative is
>> to use Exceptions
On 5/6/09 8:55 AM, "Per Jessen" wrote:
> Shawn McKenzie already posted the right solution - did you miss it?
no, per, i didn't. i like do {} while (0) very much. thanks, shawn!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Tom Worster wrote:
> On 5/6/09 6:56 AM, "Marcus Gnaß" wrote:
>
>> Tom Worster wrote:
>>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you
>>> can break out of, e.g.
>>
>> As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative
>> is to use Exceptions which might
On 5/5/09 8:55 PM, "Clancy" wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009 14:13:23 -0400, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
>>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
>>> ...
>
>> But PHP 5.3 introd
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:43 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 5/6/09 6:56 AM, "Marcus Gnaß" wrote:
>
> > Tom Worster wrote:
> >> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> >> break out of, e.g.
> >
> > As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternati
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:41 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 5/6/09 7:05 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
>
> > That seems like an abuse of exceptions. But then we're already abusing
> > loops. I just don't think one could say it's the proper way to do it :)
>
> i don't have a lot of interest in "the
On 5/6/09 6:56 AM, "Marcus Gnaß" wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
>> break out of, e.g.
>
> As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative is
> to use Exceptions which might be the most proper way to do i
On 5/6/09 7:05 AM, "Robert Cummings" wrote:
> That seems like an abuse of exceptions. But then we're already abusing
> loops. I just don't think one could say it's the proper way to do it :)
i don't have a lot of interest in "the proper way" to do things. i'm
interested in how other programmers
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:56 +0200, Marcus Gnaß wrote:
> Tom Worster wrote:
> > there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> > break out of, e.g.
>
>
> As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative is
> to use Exceptions which might be the most p
Tom Worster wrote:
> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> break out of, e.g.
As Maarten pointed out you could use a function. Another alternative is
to use Exceptions which might be the most proper way to do it.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.ne
On Tue, 05 May 2009 14:13:23 -0400, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
>> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
>> ...
>But PHP 5.3 introduces goto:
>
>
>header:
>
>if( $something ) .
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Worster wrote:
> there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
> break out of, e.g.
>
> block {
>
> if ( condition )
> break;
>
> blah...
> blah...
>
> if ( another condition )
> break;
>
> blah...
> blah...
>
there's a control structure i wish php had: a simple block that you can
break out of, e.g.
block {
if ( condition )
break;
blah...
blah...
if ( another condition )
break;
blah...
blah...
etc...
}
the block is just like a loop except that it is executed once only.
this
24 matches
Mail list logo
