On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 19:03 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 23 April 2010 18:26, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Richardson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
> >
> > > On 23 April 2010 18:10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > > I
On 23 April 2010 18:26, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Richardson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
> > On 23 April 2010 18:10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > I think for now I'll just resort to leaving it as a public variable.
> >
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 12:25 -0400, Adam Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
> > On 23 April 2010 18:10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > I think for now I'll just resort to leaving it as a public variable.
> > > I'll leave the specific set function for it in an
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 23 April 2010 18:10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > I think for now I'll just resort to leaving it as a public variable.
> > I'll leave the specific set function for it in and just hope that is
> > used instead! As it's only me who'll be using
On 23 April 2010 18:10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I think for now I'll just resort to leaving it as a public variable.
> I'll leave the specific set function for it in and just hope that is
> used instead! As it's only me who'll be using it for the time being, I
> can always yell at myself later if
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:57 -0400, Adam Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>
> > On 23 April 2010 10:55, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > I know the subject line might sound a bit like an oxymoron, but bear
> > > with me!
> > >
> > > What I'd like to have
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 23 April 2010 10:55, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > I know the subject line might sound a bit like an oxymoron, but bear
> > with me!
> >
> > What I'd like to have is a property of an object that behaves like a
> > public variable when it
On 23 April 2010 10:55, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I know the subject line might sound a bit like an oxymoron, but bear
> with me!
>
> What I'd like to have is a property of an object that behaves like a
> public variable when it comes to reading, but like a protected one when
> it comes to writing,
I know the subject line might sound a bit like an oxymoron, but bear
with me!
What I'd like to have is a property of an object that behaves like a
public variable when it comes to reading, but like a protected one when
it comes to writing, as it would make my code a lot easier to read.
I know abo
9 matches
Mail list logo
