[PHP] PHP5 OOP: Abstract classes, multiple inheritance and constructors

Example/working code here: Couple questions: 1. Is there anything wrong with the way I'm using the abstract class? If so, how could I improve the logic/setup? 2. Is there a way for me to pass $foo to the parent class, from the child, without having to fe

Re: [PHP] php5-fpm segfault

You think this is PHP's bug? I'm not sure. Because PHP installed not latest version and yesterday i tune memory_limit setting to 256M (was -1) and no segfaults registered since that moment. I think, bad designed script allocate too much memory and php-fpm worker become mad and kill himself. But it'

Re: [PHP] php5-fpm segfault

Hi : could you file a bug at https://bugs.php.net/ this is the proper way to report a bug :) thanks -- Laruence  Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] PHP5 cgi Suexec htaccess rewrite issue

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Shaun Morrow wrote: > I am running a server with cPanel on and want to have php run as a cgi > with > Suexec enabled > > I cannot seem to rectify an issue, when I set the handler to cgi, my > rewrite > rules on one of my sites stop working > > Sample url: http://e

[PHP] PHP5 cgi Suexec htaccess rewrite issue

I am running a server with cPanel on and want to have php run as a cgi with Suexec enabled I cannot seem to rectify an issue, when I set the handler to cgi, my rewrite rules on one of my sites stop working Sample url: http://examplesite.com/ad/123-abcde/ The rewrite rule for this is below; Re

[PHP] php5-fpm segfault

Hello. I'm getting problem. OS: Ububtu Server 2.6.38-8-server PHP: PHP 5.3.5-1ubuntu7.2 with Suhosin-Patch Work over fastcgi (fpm) with cherokee web server. PHP fall often with such messages in syslog: Sep 28 11:01:25 userver kernel: [278665.292418] php5-fpm[31892]: segfault at 80001000321 ip 000

Re: [PHP] php5 - website development - what next

On 8 October 2010 14:53, Rakesh Mishra wrote: > Hi All, > > I  am PHP 4 & PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year  also got Zend > certification. > Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse > racing domains. > > But now I am little bored with developing website.

Re: [PHP] php5 - website development - what next

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:23:59PM +0530, Rakesh Mishra wrote: > Hi All, > > I am PHP 4 & PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year also got Zend > certification. > Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse > racing domains. > > But now I am little bored with

Re: [PHP] php5 - website development - what next

On 10/08/2010 22:06, 惠新宸 wrote: test, i can't send mail to lists? thanks On 10/08/2010 22:02, 惠新宸 wrote: Hi: 1. you can be a Software Architect 2. you can abstract common requirements, developed php extension. thanks. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe,

Re: [PHP] php5 - website development - what next

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 09:53, Rakesh Mishra wrote: > > Even I believe my knowledge, interest, & market value  with PHP 5 is getting > saturated. > Do you guys suggest me what other thing I can learn or work which help me to > keep my lust for PHP alive > and also boost my career. Write deskto

[PHP] php5 - website development - what next

Hi All, I am PHP 4 & PHP 5 developer for last 6 yrs. Last year also got Zend certification. Since now I have work on different CMS, Social Networking, telecome , horse racing domains. But now I am little bored with developing website. What other things I can do with PHP ? Even I believe my kno

[PHP] PHP5+APACHE 2.2 + Windows 2003 production server

Hi all PHP manual state "We do not recommend using a threaded MPM in production with Apache 2. Use the prefork MPM instead, or use Apache 1. For information on why, read the related FAQ entry on using Apache2 with a threaded MPM" ( http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php ) >From a

Re: [PHP] PHP5 SOAP...

Hi, Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 1:21:47 AM, you wrote: RJ> I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing RJ> miserably. RJ> Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually RJ> being sent. I feel like I am constructing the call correctly, and I kno

RE: [PHP] PHP5 SOAP...

Behalf Of Russell Jones Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:22 AM To: PHP General Subject: [PHP] PHP5 SOAP... I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing miserably. Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually being sent. I feel like I

[PHP] PHP5 SOAP...

I'm working on a project using SOAP and WS-Security in which I am failing miserably. Is there a way to inspect the actual XML, header, etc. that is actually being sent. I feel like I am constructing the call correctly, and I know exactly what needs to be sent, but I dont know how to see exactly wh

[PHP] PHP5 based Web-Chat?

Hello, I like to install a forum for my customers and additional a PHP5 based Web-Chat system with publich and private chatrooms. What can you recommend? Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

Re: [PHP] php5-mhash disabled...

Anders Norrbring wrote: I just saw that mhash is disabled in the spec file for php5 if SUSE version is 11.0 or higher. Simple question, does it do any harm? If they decided to do that it's best to ask suse (or on the opensuse lists if you're using that flavour). It may just be because it's d

[PHP] php5-mhash disabled...

I just saw that mhash is disabled in the spec file for php5 if SUSE version is 11.0 or higher. Simple question, does it do any harm? I know it's been deprecated in favor for hash, but I have quite a few apps using mhash still, so if it doesn't do any harm I thought I'd continue using it until all

[PHP] PHP5 - SOAP extension and WSDL generation

Hi there, I'm trying to find out how to generate a WSDL with the functions I am providing as web services, and I'm finding various posts on the net that say it's not possible with the SOAP extension built in PHP5. At the same time, I find that http://www.php.net/manual/en/soap.constants.php list

[PHP] php5 with apache 1.x -> white page

Hi there, after strugling a while with the installation of php5 on an older suse system with mysql 3.x and apache 1.x I got it compiled and installed. Apache starts and there are processes running, even the access log shows access to it. Response is 500 (internal error). The page itself doe

[PHP] PHP5 DOM Problem

Hi there. I don't kno id this is the correct place to post but... I am using the PHP5 DOM to make up RSS Feeds .. A Problem I have is I want to make this up for itunes.. http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd";> etc.. I use.. $p_dom = new DOMDocument('1.0','UTF-8'); $p_rss = $p_dom-

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:54 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly > access

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:54 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly accessible, > > now, due to the ability to trap via __get() or __set(), I can remove > > them a

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, the point is moot. If I've made my properties publicly accessible, > now, due to the ability to trap via __get() or __set(), I can remove > them and handle them. Thus, I can retrospectively change the semantics > w

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:17 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > What he means is don't ask for the data literally (by property name) ask > > for it via a method. This allows wrapping the data in "work". This is a > > moo

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What he means is don't ask for the data literally (by property name) ask > for it via a method. This allows wrapping the data in "work". This is a > moot issue in PHP since PHP allows trapping the property accessor. i

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let me quote, you said this: "Is no different than" You are wrong, in > fact it IS different. Having your own custom methods to get or set data > allows you to have more control over what data is injected into your object

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:50 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote: > Nick Stinemates wrote: > >>> Data Hiding IS Encapsulation. > >>> But, you have to agree, > >>> >>> class Lol { > >>> private $bar; > >>> public function getBar() { return $bar } > >>> public function setBar($bar) { $this->bar = $bar} > >>>

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

Nick Stinemates wrote: Data Hiding IS Encapsulation. But, you have to agree, bar = $bar} } ?> Is no different than: Here's a more thought out argument from http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2003/jw-0905-toolbox.html : A fundamental precept of OO systems is that an object should not expos

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a relatively narrow minded response to my point, since I gave > a pretty concrete example of exactly what I meant, no, its a very valid criticism of your flawed example. you supply a definition of encapsulatio

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wro

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

>> Data Hiding IS Encapsulation. >> But, you have to agree, >> > class Lol { >> private $bar; >> public function getBar() { return $bar } >> public function setBar($bar) { $this->bar = $bar} >> } >> ?> >> Is no different than: >> > class Lol { >> public $bar; >> } >> ?> >> Here's a more thought

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

Nick Stinemates wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote: Hello! Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:25:29AM -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which i

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Nick Stinemates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good. > > > > I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are

Re: [PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Michael Preminger wrote: > Hello! > > Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good. > > I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are going to > use the *DOM* interface. I am trying to teach them good OO practices, > meanin

[PHP] PHP5 and the DOM model

Hello! Seems that PHP gets more and more object oriented, which is good. I am now running a course in PHP, using PHP 5, where we are going to use the *DOM* interface. I am trying to teach them good OO practices, meaning that we insistently hide properties and expose them as get or set methods.

Re: [PHP] PHP5 strtotime

On Monday 10 March 2008, Samuel Marshall wrote: > I use PayPal as my ecommerce solution and I have a PHP script that captures > variables posted from PayPal to populate my database. The time variable > string is sent in the following format: HH:MM:SS DD Mmm YY, PST. The > script worked fine bu

[PHP] PHP5 strtotime

I use PayPal as my ecommerce solution and I have a PHP script that captures variables posted from PayPal to populate my database. The time variable string is sent in the following format: HH:MM:SS DD Mmm YY, PST. The script worked fine but since I upgraded to PHP5 the dates inputted into my da

[PHP] PHP5 and XSLTProcessor: disable validation

Hi, i'm currently learning php by implementing a blog system. This uses xsl for transformation to (x)html. It is working so far, but it is slow. As far as i can see the XSLTProcessor is doing a validation. Doing the same transformation with xsltproc (the command line tool for libxslt) takes abou

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

Hi everyone! Generaly author of the first e-mail is right. Ofcource, crawling over the code and getting out of it a few milliseconds off doesn't make it worth, but you can learn what is good and what is bad and write your code correctly from the start. Why not to use foreach ($data as &$value) if

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

On Dec 31, 2007 3:47 PM, Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > Richard Lynch wrote: > > > On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote:

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

Nathan Nobbe wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Richard Lynch wrote: > On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote: > >> Hi Fellows, >> >> I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

On Dec 31, 2007 3:37 PM, Michael McGlothlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Lynch wrote: > > On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote: > > > >> Hi Fellows, > >> > >> I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes, > >> I hope I use the right word. > >> > >> I

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

Richard Lynch wrote: On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote: Hi Fellows, I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes, I hope I use the right word. I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation. As well I figured out, that I in most cases shou

Re: [PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

On Sat, December 22, 2007 12:25 pm, Sascha Braun wrote: > Hi Fellows, > > I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes, > I hope I use the right word. > > I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation. > > As well I figured out, that I in most cases should references

[PHP] PHP5 Speed Issues

Hi Fellows, I figured out, that PHP5 runs faster when I am not inherit classes, I hope I use the right word. I mean the class sub_class extends main_class notation. As well I figured out, that I in most cases should references in foreach loops. like foreach($array as $key => &$value) { } Lots

Re: [PHP] php5 - possible bug discovered

David Restall - System Administrator wrote: My main obesrvation is that I'm glad that I decided to revisit all my old PHP4 stuff and rewrite or clean it up. I have hundreds of $Working_Class = $Under_Class; lines in my code as well as $Upper_Class = & $Aristocracy; lines too. I think the do

Re: [PHP] php5 - possible bug discovered

Hi Robert, Stut & List Thanks for your replies which arrived after I had gone to bed |-Z Robert :- > In PHP5 objects are no longer copied when assigned. Instead the object's > handle is assigned (similar to a reference but not quite). So the > behaviour is as expected. Stut :- > > I think I ha

Re: [PHP] php5 - possible bug discovered

David Restall - System Administrator wrote: I think I have discovered a bug in php5. If I haven't, I've discovered a bug in the documentation or a bug in my brain. Start here: http://php.net/language.oop5.cloning -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To

Re: [PHP] php5 - possible bug discovered

In PHP5 objects are no longer copied when assigned. Instead the object's handle is assigned (similar to a reference but not quite). So the behaviour is as expected. Cheers, Rob. On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 21:42 +0100, David Restall - System Administrator wrote: > Hi, > > I think I have discovered a

[PHP] php5 - possible bug discovered

Hi, I think I have discovered a bug in php5. If I haven't, I've discovered a bug in the documentation or a bug in my brain. php -v :- PHP 5.2.3 (cli) (built: Jun 26 2007 15:38:48) Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies I've attached

Re: [PHP] PHP5 under IIS6

sure the php5isapi.dll is mapped to the .php extension. Regards, Carlton Whitehead - Original Message - From: "Alberto García Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: php-general@lists.php.net Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 9:57:42 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: [PHP] PHP

[PHP] PHP5 under IIS6

Hi fellows: I'm trying to mount PHP5 ( the last stable version from php.net) under a IIS6 (win2k3 SP2), and when I run the .msi and it finish it said that is not possible the configure httpd.conf, which is a very big mistake 'cause I'm specify that I use IIS6. After that I try making a manua

Re: [PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:57:57 +0300, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers have some nice web albums or blog. The turkish tr

Re: [PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

On 9/6/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. > > Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers > > have some > > nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation file

Re: [PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:57:57 +0300, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers have some nice web albums or blog. The turkish tr

Re: [PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

Now that's service! On 9/6/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. > > Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have > customers > > have some > > nice web albums or blog. The

Re: [PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

On 9/6/07, Roman Neumüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. > Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers > have some > nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation files of such opensource > software > usually use gettext an

[PHP] php5: capital "I" letters in func/class method names do not work with turkish locale in php5

I'm a german web-designer living in Turkey. Sometimes I use opensource software like gallery2 or WP to have customers have some nice web albums or blog. The turkish translation files of such opensource software usually use gettext and .po files for i18n and are always a bit behind the transl

[PHP] php5 as universal binary (Mac OsX)

FIX/include -L$PREFIX/lib" export LDFLAGS="-L$PREFIX/lib -I$PREFIX/include" export SOFLAGS="-L$PREFIX/lib" CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -arch i386 -arch ppc" ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX --program-suffix=-5.2.3 --libdir=$PREFIX/lib/php/php5 --includedir= $PREFIX/include/p

RE: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

From: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2007 21:29 To: Steve Perkins Cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction) You probably ought to have: class mysql_driver extends generic_driver { } Seems like that would be the

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

You probably ought to have: class mysql_driver extends generic_driver { } Seems like that would be the most reasonable OOP model, imho. That said, I suspect that if you do something like: $driver = $this->driver; You then may be able to access the driver-specific data using $driver->propl; e

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:50 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > Robert, > > I looked at your code in InterJinn a couple of times; i havent gone over all > of it mind you but it looks pretty sweet. It's very different in many respects from other styles of coding. It's an MVC approach for the most part bu

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

Robert, I looked at your code in InterJinn a couple of times; i havent gone over all of it mind you but it looks pretty sweet. have you had a look at any of the other frameworks i mentioned earlier in this thread? ez components, onPHP, and now there is a new one ive found (in recent thread) Radic

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

some ideas about class design: 1. properties should normally (read almost always) be private. 2. the apps interface to the DB [connection] is via the 'generic' class, the app should have to know nothing about the drive object and should have no direct access to it. 3. use an interface definition f

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:07 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > I also don't really get the idea of interface and abstract classes ? They > > don't seem to be any practical use ? Maybe that's me ? Anyway, not really > > relevant to this post ... > > there is a lot of usefulness in these constructs; loo

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

I also don't really get the idea of interface and abstract classes ? They don't seem to be any practical use ? Maybe that's me ? Anyway, not really relevant to this post ... there is a lot of usefulness in these constructs; look into design patterns. also, there are code libraries already writte

Re: [PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:46 +0100, Steve Perkins wrote: > > I guess there are lots of "workaround" ways. I could write lots of > "middleman" code in generic and use things like __set and __get etc but its > lots of extra overhead. I also know I could use extends but that makes the > code the wrong

[PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model (correction)

OK, so that came out fairly illegible. Try again: Hi, new to PHP5 (and the forums evidently !) and I have a question about the object model. I want to be able to create a class which is allows abstraction from specifics. So for one example, imagine a generic database connection wrapper which can

[PHP] PHP5 objects access/instantiation model

Hi, new to PHP5 and I have a question about the object model. I want to be able to create a class which is allows abstraction from specifics. So for one example, imagine a generic database connection wrapper which can have multiple drivers depending on the database used. Some of the functionalit

Re: [PHP] PHP5 TUTORIAL

hello, other interesting articles to give a bird's eye view of new features for php5 http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/php/2004/07/15/UpgradePHP5.html http://devzone.zend.com/node/view/id/1714 http://www.devshed.com/c/a/PHP/Whats-New-in-PHP-5/ hth. yashesh bhatia. On 6/26/07, Preethi <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [PHP] PHP5 TUTORIAL

if you want to spend a little i would recommend this book from php|arch http://www.phparch.com/shop_product.php?itemid=135 -nathan On 6/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Preethi > Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5. > Am already working on php4. > Need

Re: [PHP] PHP5 TUTORIAL

Hi Preethi > Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5. > Am already working on php4. > Need to migrate from php4 to php5. i think this is very important for OOP: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.php and this one: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.exceptions.php rega

[PHP] PHP5 TUTORIAL

BlankHi, Need to have a kick start on PHP5. Kindly suggest me the good online tutorial for PHP5. Am already working on php4. Need to migrate from php4 to php5. Regards, Preethi. Extn No: 4099 Some of the greatest science comes from those unaware of established rules and theories.

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sunday 10 June 2007, tedd wrote: > At 10:05 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > >> You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. > > > >Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE. > >

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

At 10:05 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote: On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE. Cheers, Rob. Rob: You raise an excellent and ob

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 11:01 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > > > You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. > > > > Must be a zombie then because I see it running

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On 6/10/07, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > > You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. > > Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVER

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Saturday 09 June 2007, Robert Cummings wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > > You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. > > Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE. Yep, it is. PHP 4 is trying to eat your brains

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:18 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. Must be a zombie then because I see it running almost EVERYWHERE. Cheers, Rob. -- .. | InterJinn Application

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:10 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 3:27 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I > >>learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have t

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

You should get a new server that supports PHP 5.2.1. PHP 4 is dead. It hasn't had a non-security/bug release in years. PHP 5 is 3 years old. The one and only reason to care about PHP 4 at this point is if you're writing something that has to run on any possible cheap shared web host, and eve

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

At 3:27 PM -0400 6/9/07, Robert Cummings wrote: On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote: Hi all, After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation like

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On 6/9/07, elk dolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every page has so

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sat, June 9, 2007 1:59 pm, elk dolk wrote: > After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I > learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to > rollback to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation like > classes or objects in my scripts but every page has some >

Re: [PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 11:59 -0700, elk dolk wrote: > Hi all, > After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned > that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . > There is no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every

[PHP] PHP5 or PHP4 this is the question

Hi all, After designing and testing my web pages in PHP 5.2.1 I learned that our web server has PHP 4.4.1 and I have to rollback to version 4 ! . There is no OO implementation like classes or objects in my scripts but every page has some queries the question is : will my scripts wor

Re: [PHP] PHP5 oop question...

Stut wrote: > Andrei wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some >> comments. >> I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed >> when function is called inside a class. To the point: >> >> [CODE] >> class PHS_editor >> { >>

Re: [PHP] PHP5 oop question...

Andrei wrote: Hi list, I have a class which I use to parse simple bbcode inside some comments. I noticed on PHP5 that scope of preg_replace function is changed when function is called inside a class. To the point: [CODE] class PHS_editor { ... function parse_content( $str =

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

On Sun, May 20, 2007 10:14 am, Danial Rahmanzadeh wrote: > are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as phparch > asserted? I'm pretty sure after seeing Star Trek: Voyage Home, that Vulcan exams are MUCH harder than the PHP 5 exam. -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I w

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

On Fri, May 18, 2007 4:45 pm, Greg Donald wrote: > Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? The php4 > test was pretty simple for me, but that was a couple of years ago. It > seems there's quite a bit of new material being covered on the php5 > version. I figure with the same n

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

Actually I found the real exam harder than the test exam. It may have just been the question set I ended up with, but it was a lot more nitpicky on details that I rarely use in my work. On Sunday 20 May 2007, Danial Rahmanzadeh wrote: > are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as ph

[PHP] php5 cert

are volcan exams really harder than actual php5 exam as phparch asserted?

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

On 5/19/07, Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As worthless as the php4 cert. Mine has been very valuable to me, lots more job interviews and freelance work compared to before I got it. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscrib

Re: [PHP] php5 cert

This one time, at band camp, "Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? As worthless as the php4 cert. Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

[PHP] php5 cert

Anyone wanna share their insights into the php5 cert test? The php4 test was pretty simple for me, but that was a couple of years ago. It seems there's quite a bit of new material being covered on the php5 version. I figure with the same number of questions, things had to get more general if an

[PHP] PHP5 Static functions called through __call() that don't exist... yet

Hi all, I am building an assertType object using static functions. What I want to keep away from is the following: public static function assertString($para){ return $answer; }; public static function assertBool($para){ return $answer; }; ... public static function assertArray($para){

Re: [PHP] php5 include() problem

Is there an alternate way to execute a php in cgi-bin so it can do a chmod() on site directories as the "owner"? My approach was the only way I could think of. Given the obvious problem(s), it appears that it may not be a good choice. Richard Davey wrote: Al wrote: I've got a cgi file in m

Re: [PHP] php5 include() problem

Al wrote: I've got a cgi file in my cgi-bin folder that I'm calling with include(). It worked with php4. My shared host just upgraded to my server to php5.2.0 and the function doesn't work. I can't tell if the problem is a php5 or server configuration [which may have changed during the upgr

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >