Re: [PHP] performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

2004-10-07 Thread Curt Zirzow
* Thus wrote Hans H. Anderson: > I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a large > include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe 3 or 4 This is all a 'depends' situation. Of those 15 functions how many of them are actually executed accross

Re: [PHP] performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

2004-10-07 Thread Greg Donald
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:41:10 -0500 (CDT), Hans H. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a large > include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe 3 or 4 > are used on any given page, or to have each func

[PHP] performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

2004-10-07 Thread Hans H. Anderson
I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a large include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe 3 or 4 are used on any given page, or to have each function in it's own file and include (disk access/read) them only as needed. Is it faster/mor