On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, eat pasta type fasta wrote:
> currently I am holding all of the files in 1 directory since the DB can
> keep track of them, however their number has grown to over 400 at this
> point
>
> my issue is whether it would be worth it (performance wise) to split them
> into thumb
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:09:12 -0400, you wrote:
>currently I am holding all of the files in 1 directory since the DB can
>keep track of them, however their number has grown to over 400 at this
>point
>
>my issue is whether it would be worth it (performance wise) to split them
>into thumbs and w
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:09, eat pasta type fasta wrote:
> I'm using mysql to hold references to image files then served on my pages
> via PHP.
>
> I have typically a set of two files:
>
> thumb and a large original, on occasion there is also a variant inreasing
> the set to 3 per image
>
> curr
I'm using mysql to hold references to image files then served on my pages
via PHP.
I have typically a set of two files:
thumb and a large original, on occasion there is also a variant inreasing
the set to 3 per image
currently I am holding all of the files in 1 directory since the DB can
kee
4 matches
Mail list logo
