tedd wrote:
At 3:16 PM + 3/13/08, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
I question the reason why you would want to encrypt the cookie
considering that before the user is going to be provided access to
sensitive data that you require a password confirmation. The
encryption seems to be an unnecessary ov
tedd wrote:
At 4:01 PM + 3/13/08, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
Then, when the user returns, you simply check the cookie with what's
stored in the dB and continue as before. If the check fails (no
session id or it has been altered), then start again.
Because that negates the whole point of doi
At 4:01 PM + 3/13/08, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
Then, when the user returns, you simply check the cookie with
what's stored in the dB and continue as before. If the check fails
(no session id or it has been altered), then start again.
Because that negates the whole point of doing it which i
At 3:16 PM + 3/13/08, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
Nice article.
Thanks.
I question the reason why you would want to encrypt the cookie
considering that before the user is going to be provided access to
sensitive data that you require a password confirmation. The
encryption seems to be an u
tedd wrote:
Nice article.
Thanks.
I question the reason why you would want to encrypt the cookie
considering that before the user is going to be provided access to
sensitive data that you require a password confirmation. The encryption
seems to be an unnecessary overkill.
So what if a mal
At 12:34 PM + 3/11/08, Stut wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user state ... now I
can think of a way or two that he might do that but I w
On 11 Mar 2008, at 14:26, Zoltán Németh wrote:
2008. 03. 11, kedd keltezéssel 12.34-kor Stut ezt írta:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user
state
2008. 03. 11, kedd keltezéssel 12.34-kor Stut ezt írta:
> On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
> > Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
> > session
>
> > mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user
> > state ... now I
> > can think of a
On 11 Mar 2008, at 13:31, Thiago Pojda wrote:
-Mensagem original-
De: Stut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user
-Mensagem original-
De: Stut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
> session
> mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user state
> ... now I can think of a way or t
On 4 Mar 2008, at 13:57, Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user
state ... now I
can think of a way or two that he might do that but I was wondering if
any one could give an
At 10:45 AM -0500 3/5/08, Jason Pruim wrote:
>Me personally, I'm on Wife 1.0 (Still working out a few bugs before
>1.1 is released) But I do have Son 1.20 and in a few months Son 2.0
>will be released into the wild.. The only problem I have found with
>wife 1.0 and son 1.20 is my bank account whi
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:19 AM, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:45 AM -0500 3/5/08, Jason Pruim wrote:
> >Me personally, I'm on Wife 1.0 (Still working out a few bugs before
> >1.1 is released) But I do have Son 1.20 and in a few months Son 2.0
> >will be released into the wild.. The on
At 10:45 AM -0500 3/5/08, Jason Pruim wrote:
Me personally, I'm on Wife 1.0 (Still working out a few bugs before
1.1 is released) But I do have Son 1.20 and in a few months Son 2.0
will be released into the wild.. The only problem I have found with
wife 1.0 and son 1.20 is my bank account which
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Zoltán Németh wrote:
2008. 03. 4, kedd keltezéssel 18.05-kor Nathan Rixham ezt írta:
tedd wrote:
At 12:15 PM -0500 3/4/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
Amazingly, I do get all of my stuff done. Granted, I'm in front
of a computer seven days per week, and usually a min
2008. 03. 4, kedd keltezéssel 18.05-kor Nathan Rixham ezt írta:
> tedd wrote:
> > At 12:15 PM -0500 3/4/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >> Amazingly, I do get all of my stuff done. Granted, I'm in front
> >> of a computer seven days per week, and usually a minimum of 10-12
> >> hours per day, but wh
2008. 03. 4, kedd keltezéssel 12.15-kor Daniel Brown ezt írta:
> but what else would I do? Spend time with the
> pre-wife?
sure that's what you should :)
greets,
Zoltán Németh
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, March 4, 2008 10:22 am, Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
On Tue, March 4, 2008 8:22 am, Bojan Tesanovic wrote:
> Hi,
> It depends what do you need to track,
> if you need to track small amount of variables you can do it by cookie
> I often use it eg here is the state for one user
> $state = array{
> 'logedin'=>true,
> 'n'=>'Peter',
> 'id'=>'5',
> //any
At 6:05 PM + 3/4/08, Nathan Rixham wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 12:15 PM -0500 3/4/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
Amazingly, I do get all of my stuff done. Granted, I'm in front
of a computer seven days per week, and usually a minimum of 10-12
hours per day, but what else would I do? Spend time wit
tedd wrote:
At 12:15 PM -0500 3/4/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
Amazingly, I do get all of my stuff done. Granted, I'm in front
of a computer seven days per week, and usually a minimum of 10-12
hours per day, but what else would I do? Spend time with the
pre-wife?
You're working on wife 1.0 b
At 12:15 PM -0500 3/4/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
Amazingly, I do get all of my stuff done. Granted, I'm in front
of a computer seven days per week, and usually a minimum of 10-12
hours per day, but what else would I do? Spend time with the
pre-wife?
You're working on wife 1.0 beta -- wait u
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> >You're full of crap. I have a day job, too, but I still feel like
> > I spend half of my time reading and responding to list posts. ;-P
>
> Ummm... Mr. Brown... I'
On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on an article
for my website that describes exactly how I
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown schreef:
> > You're full of crap. I have a day job, too, but I still feel like
> > I spend half of my time reading and responding to list posts. ;-P
>
> you should check the stats mail you send out
> ..
On 4 Mar 2008, at 16:11, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on an article
for my website that describes exactly how I'm doi
Daniel Brown schreef:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm working on an article
>> for my website that describes exactly how I'm doing it and what
Stut schreef:
On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on an article
for my website that describes exactly how I'm doing it and what the
issues are but it's not ready yet. I'll let the list know when it's
done.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm working on an article
> >> for my website that describes exactly how I'm doing it and what the
> >> issues
On 4 Mar 2008, at 15:52, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on an article
for my website that describes exactly how I'm doing it and what the
issues are but it's not ready yet. I'll let the list know when it's
done.
Is it done yet
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on an article
> for my website that describes exactly how I'm doing it and what the
> issues are but it's not ready yet. I'll let the list know when it's
> done.
Is it done yet?
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix
Hi,
It depends what do you need to track,
if you need to track small amount of variables you can do it by cookie
I often use it eg here is the state for one user
$state = array{
'logedin'=>true,
'n'=>'Peter',
'id'=>'5',
//anything else you need
}
//at end of you script before outputing any conten
On 4 Mar 2008, at 14:05, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user
state ...
now I can think of a way or two that he might do that but I was
wondering if
any one could g
[snip]
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in
session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user state ...
now I can think of a way or two that he might do that but I was
wondering if
any one could give an idea about the write way to do it in terms o
hi people, hi Stut!
Stut mentioned a little while back that he avoids using the built-in session
mechanism if at all possible, but still manages to track user state ... now I
can think of a way or two that he might do that but I was wondering if
any one could give an idea about the write way to d
35 matches
Mail list logo
