At 2003-08-16 23:05 +, Curt Zirzow wrote:
>* Thus wrote Binay Agarwal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> Lot of places in manual i came across using "ereg_replace" or "ereg" is very
>> resource intensive and hence its better to use "preg_replace" or "str_replace" or
>> "strpos" if t
* Thus wrote Binay Agarwal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi everybody,
>
> Lot of places in manual i came across using "ereg_replace" or "ereg" is very
> resource intensive and hence its better to use "preg_replace" or "str_replace" or
> "strpos" if they do the jobs.
>
I believe the use of ereg_repla
preg_replace_impl(INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAM_PASSTHRU, 0);
1116 }
1117 /* }}} */
Greetz,
Wouter
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Binay Agarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 16 augustus 2003 2:39
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [PHP] better understanding of ereg_replace
Message-
From: Binay Agarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] better understanding of ereg_replace and other functions
Hi everybody,
Lot of places in manual i came across using "ereg_replace" or "ereg" is
ver
Hi everybody,
Lot of places in manual i came across using "ereg_replace" or "ereg" is very resource
intensive and hence its better to use "preg_replace" or "str_replace" or "strpos" if
they do the jobs.
Now i am very curious to look at the source code (implementation) of these function so
as t
5 matches
Mail list logo