As has been said: It all depends on the developer. A skilled developer
is not restrained by how "secure" the particular language is. A
skilled developer will know the pitfalls of that language, and be able
to avoid them.
With php as an example, you have register_globals. Now,
register_globals is
Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
curious how might you respond to someone who says:
PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
user authentication system.
We should use XXX.
I think security mainly depends on the programmer and no
On Thu, February 1, 2007 9:19 am, Eric Gorr wrote:
> Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
> curious how might you respond to someone who says:
>
> PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
> user authentication system.
> We should use XX
Eric Gorr wrote:
PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
user authentication system.
We should use XXX.
Well, people's complaints about PHP probably stem from some security
pitfalls built-in for simplicity's sake. (The most common being
register_globals.) For th
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 10:19 -0500, Eric Gorr wrote:
>
> Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm
> curious how might you respond to someone who says:
>
> PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a
> user authentication system.
> We shoul
On cs, 2007-02-01 at 10:19 -0500, Eric Gorr wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
> > Eric Gorr wrote:
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> >>
> >>> Eric Gorr wrote:
> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more
> insecure then
>
On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more
insecure then
other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I perso
Eric Gorr wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
>
>> Eric Gorr wrote:
>>> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure then
>>> other methods of developing website where security was of prime
>>> importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it wo
On 2/1/07, Eric Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
>
> Also, check out
> http://www.shiflett.org as Chris is one of if not the leading
> expert in
> security with PHP.
Great site. thank you.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Also, check out
http://www.shiflett.org as Chris is one of if not the leading
expert in
security with PHP.
Great site. thank you.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure
then
other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would
help me
to convince others
[snip]
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure
then other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help
me to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security
(mostly wi
Eric Gorr wrote:
> I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure then
> other methods of developing website where security was of prime
> importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help me
> to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security
I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure
then other methods of developing website where security was of prime
importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help
me to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security
(mostly with resp
14 matches
Mail list logo
