On Friday 04 April 2003 09:44, Jason Smith wrote:
> In one part it is saying that it is known to work and then goes on to
> say is not recommended. Does anyone know why it is not recommended.
WHY it is not recommended has been discussed in the past -- search archives
for Rasmus' posts for the pa
There isn't.
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jason Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Need some information as I cant seem to find it in the manual or online.
>
> We are running apache 2.0.39 on redhat 7.3 and would like to run PHP on
> the same server.
> I am having trouble finding out if there is a stable version that
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:45 PM
To: Jennifer Goodie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Which PHP version is stable with apache 2.0.39
Jennifer,
Thank you, I have followed that link previously and however find it
somewhat confusing.
~These versions of PHP are
ioned versions of PHP will work still with Apache 1.3.x.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Goodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 4 April 2003 11:25 AM
To: Jason Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Which PHP version is stable with apache 2.0.39
http://www.php.net/manu
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.apache2.php
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] Which PHP version is stable with apache 2.0.39
>
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
Need some information as I cant seem to find it in the manual or online.
We are running apache 2.0.39 on redhat 7.3 and would like to run PHP on
the same server.
I am having trouble finding out if there is a stable version that runs
with Apache 2.0.39
Any help appreciated
Cheers
jason
6 matches
Mail list logo
