Re: [PHP] W3C and PHP

2002-11-09 Thread Ernest E Vogelsinger
At 15:22 09.11.2002, @ Edwin said: [snip] >True. And & IS a valid html. In fact, changing & to & is the only >way I could pass the xhtml validator. So, it's not really a bug when the >validator complains about the & sign... [snip]-

Re: [PHP] W3C and PHP

2002-11-09 Thread Jens Lehmann
>> ... If this is really what the W3C validator tells you you should file a bug > report, IMHO. Passing GET variables should be valid HTML ;-) Usually entities start with "&" and end with ";". The "entity" §ion doesn't end with ";" and is not defined, that's why it's not valid. Jens PS: Be awa

Re: [PHP] W3C and PHP

2002-11-09 Thread @ Edwin
Hello, "Ernest E Vogelsinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > If this is really what the W3C validator tells you you should file a bug > report, IMHO. Passing GET variables should be valid HTML ;-) [/snip] True. And & IS a valid html. In fact, changing & to & is the only way I could pass th

Re: [PHP] W3C and PHP

2002-11-09 Thread Ernest E Vogelsinger
At 07:12 09.11.2002, conbud said: [snip] >Hi, >In some of my URLs I have to pass variables through the URL like >nav.php?page=about§ion=linux - when i do this and then scan my site for >W3C validation I get this >Line 40, column 28: > ... O Ernest E. Vog

[PHP] W3C and PHP

2002-11-08 Thread conbud
Hi, In some of my URLs I have to pass variables through the URL like nav.php?page=about§ion=linux - when i do this and then scan my site for W3C validation I get this Line 40, column 28: ... http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php