Re: [PHP] Testing: DON'T Ignore This Message

2001-12-31 Thread Michael Sims
At 11:45 PM 12/31/2001 +0100, B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: >u.. I can give you one good reason.. Out Of the Office replies >don't get to the list.. M$ Lookout is specilized in bombing lists with >those stupid messages. Seems a complete list with reasons why you >shouldn't set reply to to the

Re: [PHP] Testing: DON'T Ignore This Message

2001-12-31 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
>I agree. It's a pain to have to click "Reply-to-all" and then strip out >the individuals email address (leaving only the address of the >list)...other lists that I'm on have the reply-to always pointing back to >the list so all you have to do is click "Reply" and you know it will go >where

Re: [PHP] Testing: DON'T Ignore This Message

2001-12-31 Thread Michael Sims
At 05:07 PM 12/31/2001 +0200, you wrote: >It seems to work. I'll use this thread to ask an admin question: why >doesn't the mailing list daemon add a reply-to address similar to the >one I manually added here? Wouldn't it be more comfortable for all >parties concerned? I agree. It's a pain to ha

Re: [PHP] Testing: DON'T Ignore This Message

2001-12-31 Thread Bogdan Stancescu
It seems to work. I'll use this thread to ask an admin question: why doesn't the mailing list daemon add a reply-to address similar to the one I manually added here? Wouldn't it be more comfortable for all parties concerned? Bogdan John Monfort wrote: > Test > Cannot submit to list. > Test > >