On Saturday 23 June 2007 04:29, Tijnema wrote:
> > 3) This is basically the same as point 1, but I think it's still
> > worth making. I don't know about anyone else, but this is 1 of 14
> > lists I subscribe to. Keeping track of what's happening in all
> > current threads in all those lists is not
On 6/22/07, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "logic" is subjective.
>
> When I read "Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.",
> I already knew what you were talking about without having to read the
> question.. because I knew what was being discussed in th
On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"logic" is subjective.
When I read "Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.", I already
knew what you were talking about without having to read the question.. because I knew
what was being discussed in this thread. If it w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"logic" is subjective.
When I read "Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.",
I already knew what you were talking about without having to read the
question.. because I knew what was being discussed in this thread.
If it wasn't an answer to my original ques
"logic" is subjective.
When I read "Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.", I already
knew what you were talking about without having to read the question.. because
I knew what was being discussed in this thread. If it wasn't an answer to my
original question, then it was about
Thanks again for the info, Jim. will look into the 'install to flash drive'
information. Technically that's not what I'm doing, just want to store the
virtual machine on the flash drive, but the installation instructions should be
tight enough to be pertinent still.
I think you got close eno
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q: Why is top posting bad?
This explains everything ^^^
On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, funny that you say that from a Gmail account, where top-posting is
encouraged by the mail system.
All email clients
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent information Jim! Thanks a ton! I really wish I knew linux more
intimately so I knew what was a vital organ and what was an appendix :)
Your suggestions sound like exactly what I'm looking for. Greatly appreciated!
Actually.. one question. Won't it try to
Jim Lucas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent information Jim! Thanks a ton! I really wish I knew linux
more intimately so I knew what was a vital organ and what was an
appendix :)
one other thing.
fedore + yum will do all the work for you with regards to decencies and system
requi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent information Jim! Thanks a ton! I really wish I knew linux more
intimately so I knew what was a vital organ and what was an appendix :)
Your suggestions sound like exactly what I'm looking for. Greatly appreciated!
Actually.. one question. Won't it try to
Thanks for the suggestions.. but again, the question wasn't "what distro of
linux" to use. And I don't mind upgrading things. The question is what would
someone recommend for a really small distro of linux preferably with the bare
essentials + apache, mysql, php and samba.
Failing that, I'll
Don't you punks read the archives??
http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=106579709910174&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=107902806617669&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=109556769132522&w=2
There's always someone who gets their nickers all bunched up with
respect to top postin
Excellent information Jim! Thanks a ton! I really wish I knew linux more
intimately so I knew what was a vital organ and what was an appendix :)
Your suggestions sound like exactly what I'm looking for. Greatly appreciated!
Actually.. one question. Won't it try to set up a swap partition?
My thoughts exactly, TG. I was just thinking about that this
morning, in fact --- exactly the stuff you said.
That aside, I started using a DSL/Knoppix distro to modify to
automatically install a server environment as opposed to the desktop
environment. As such, without the need for a GUI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions.. but again, the question wasn't "what distro of
linux" to use. And I don't mind upgrading things. The question is what would
someone recommend for a really small distro of linux preferably with the bare essentials
+ apache, mysql, php and
First, funny that you say that from a Gmail account, where top-posting is
encouraged by the mail system.
Second, and not to get into a big discussion about top vs bottom posting, but I
top-post because typically if I'm involved in a conversation, I know what's
been said already and don't want t
d writing my own Linux..
Tijnema
ps. Please don't top post!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:41 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Small LAMP install/distro
Yeah.. I'm
php.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Small LAMP install/distro
Yeah.. I'm aware. As I stated in my original email:
"Ideally I'd like to keep using my traditional Windows apps to do
development..."
I'm comfortable moving around in linux, but the tools and OS I ch
sage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:16 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Small LAMP install/distro
Yeah, I took a quick look at Damn Small Linux. And have been playing
around with Puppy Linux (which
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:05 -0700, Warren Vail wrote:
> Did you know that VM-ware actually runs under RH linux?
Doesn't it run under pretty much every OS?
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
Did you know that VM-ware actually runs under RH linux?
Warren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:16 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Small LAMP install/distro
Yeah, I took a
Yeah, I took a quick look at Damn Small Linux. And have been playing around
with Puppy Linux (which is pretty cool too).
I may end up using one of those. Wanted to see if there was a distro with
everything built into it already (Damn Small seems to have a lot of average
user apps and not rea
On 6/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, done all my googling and experimenting, now I'm tossing it to you guys.
Can anyone recommend a small, no frills, LAMP-centric linux package/distro?
What I'm doing is setting up a test/development environment in a VMWare virtual
machi
Ok, done all my googling and experimenting, now I'm tossing it to you guys.
Can anyone recommend a small, no frills, LAMP-centric linux package/distro?
What I'm doing is setting up a test/development environment in a VMWare virtual
machine to keep things all nice and comparmentalized. It's goin
24 matches
Mail list logo
