> sorry to bother you richard.
You didn't, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't losing it (more).
--
Richard Heyes
++
| Access SSH with a Windows mapped drive |
|http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive|
++
--
PHP G
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 00:24 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> you really know how to rub it in there rob. but i was looking at the
> implementation in the php code, looks like somebody likes my idea
> (this code
> found in ext/standard/string.c). on the second line the haystack is
> converted to low
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 23:20 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> >
> > i repeated your test using the time program and splitting the script into
> 2,
> > one for each strpos and stripos, to find similar results. imo, there is
>
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 23:20 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
> i repeated your test using the time program and splitting the script into 2,
> one for each strpos and stripos, to find similar results. imo, there is no
> need for 2 comparisons for case-insensitive searches, because both arguments
> can
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 11:18 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Did you just try to use a test that used a single iteration to prove me
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 11:18 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Did you just try to use a test that used a single iteration to prove me
> > wrong? OMFG ponies!!! Loop each one of those 10 million times, use a
> > separate
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:12 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:56 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nope, case insensitive is slower since you must make two tests for
> > > characters havin
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Did you just try to use a test that used a single iteration to prove me
> wrong? OMFG ponies!!! Loop each one of those 10 million times, use a
> separate script for each, and use the system time program to
> appropriatel
at least he have some humer ;-)
On 04/06/2008, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:56 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nope, case insensitive is slower since you must make tw
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:56 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Nope, case insensitive is slower since you must make two tests for
> > characters having a lower and upper case version. With case sensitive
> > comparisons
I can't find any good reason for regex in this case.
you can try to split it with explode / stristr / create a function by your
own which goes over the string and check when a @ is catched, something
like:
function GetDomainName ($a)
{
$returnDomain = "";
$beigale = false;
for ($i = 0; $i < strl
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nope, case insensitive is slower since you must make two tests for
> characters having a lower and upper case version. With case sensitive
> comparisons you only need to make a single comparison.
a quick test shows str
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:18 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > and the case insensitive versions are a hair faster still ;)
> >>
> >
> > Are they? I always thought that case-sensitive functions were faster
> > b
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Richard Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and the case insensitive versions are a hair faster still ;)
>>
>
> Are they? I always thought that case-sensitive functions were faster
> because they have to test fewer comparisons. Eg To test if i == I in a
> c
Hi,
and the case insensitive versions are a hair faster still ;)
Are they? I always thought that case-sensitive functions were faster
because they have to test fewer comparisons. Eg To test if i == I in a
case-insensitive fashion requires two comparisons (i == I and i == i)
whereas a case-s
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:39 PM, VamVan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> For example I have these email addressess -
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What would be my PHP function[Regular expression[ to that can give me some
> thing like
>
> yahoo.com
> h
Van" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:39 AM
Subject: [PHP] Regex in PHP
Hello All,
For example I have these email addressess -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What would be my PHP function[Regular expression[ to that can give me so
Hello All,
For example I have these email addressess -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What would be my PHP function[Regular expression[ to that can give me some
thing like
yahoo.com
hotmail.com
gmail.com
Thanks
18 matches
Mail list logo
