Regardless, I am the beneficiary of someone's good work all these years
and I, for one, appreciate it.
Jud
On 8/5/11 4:45 AM, David Robley wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:39, Jim Giner
wrote:
Mailing list, newsgroup, either one - something's changed in the last
week o
Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:39, Jim Giner
> wrote:
>>
>> Mailing list, newsgroup, either one - something's changed in the last
>> week or so to interrupt the smooth (or semi-smooth) functioning of it.
>> The only messages I'm seeing currently are the ones in this single topic
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Jim Giner wrote:
Because I'm lazy. I LIKE the newsgroup method - all my mail in one
place:
email, newsgroups together yet separate so that I can read the news
postings
when I have time, and the email is purely mine.
"Tim Streater" wrote in message
news:08.87.1
Because I'm lazy. I LIKE the newsgroup method - all my mail in one place:
email, newsgroups together yet separate so that I can read the news postings
when I have time, and the email is purely mine.
"Tim Streater" wrote in message
news:08.87.13433.b57ba...@pb1.pair.com...
On 04 Aug 2011 at 15:
On 04 Aug 2011 at 15:48, Jim Giner wrote:
> Sounds like time for me to move on.
> Thanks for the info Dan.
Say Jim,
Why don't you pick it up as mail like the rest of us?
--
Cheers -- Tim
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:48, Jim Giner wrote:
> Sounds like time for me to move on.
> Thanks for the info Dan.
>
> All the talent on this group, and a bug like this (according to posts I've
> read) has been going on for years?
Yeah, it's always been low-priority. I've started to add a
dedic
Sounds like time for me to move on.
Thanks for the info Dan.
All the talent on this group, and a bug like this (according to posts I've
read) has been going on for years?
"Daniel Brown" wrote in message
news:CAD9cneMicUmusc9Er7kOmLZKL_r-QORoYcMzGH5hQL=e4er...@mail.gmail.com...
On Thu, Aug 4, 2
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:39, Jim Giner wrote:
>
> Mailing list, newsgroup, either one - something's changed in the last week
> or so to interrupt the smooth (or semi-smooth) functioning of it. The only
> messages I'm seeing currently are the ones in this single topic. Why is
> that???
Actu
>> Al wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/2/2011 5:18 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
>>>
>>> This newsgroup has been a mess for almost a year now.
>>>
>>> One big problem is that the server only accepts a small number of
>>> connections,
""Jim Giner"" wrote in message
news:6d.60.30104.5b968...@pb1.pair.com...
> Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
>
Something's wrong. My OE still cannot connect to the news server for this
list, it continues to show unread messages are available, but it cannot
downl
On 8/3/2011 9:16 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Al wrote:
On 8/2/2011 5:18 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
This newsgroup has been a mess for almost a year now.
One big problem is that the server only accepts a small number of
conne
Al wrote:
>
>
>On 8/2/2011 5:18 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>> Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
>>
>>
>
>This newsgroup has been a mess for almost a year now.
>
>One big problem is that the server only accepts a small number of
>connections,
>for just some mail clients,
On 8/2/2011 5:18 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
This newsgroup has been a mess for almost a year now.
One big problem is that the server only accepts a small number of connections,
for just some mail clients, eg Thunderbird; but works
- Original Message -
From:
To: "'Jim Giner'" ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: testing
I was thinking the same thing I have none myself.
Your response did show up in my newsgroup. But that's the first since the
26th.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Giner [mailto:jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:25 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: testing
>
>
> ""Jim Giner"" wrote in message
> news:6d.60.3010
""Jim Giner"" wrote in message
news:6d.60.30104.5b968...@pb1.pair.com...
> Don't seem to be getting any feeds thru the newsgroup mirror(?).
>
Ok - this showed up in my OE newsgroup, but OE still shows 36 more messages
in php.general that I haven't/can't seem to retrieve. Is something wrong
wi
Sn!per wrote:
Let's say I have these URLs
http://example.com/index.php?q=gallery
http://example.com/index.php?q=gallery&g2_itemId=81
http://example.com/index.php?q=gallery&g2_itemId=100
I want to have a line of code that will extract just the
"http://example.com/index.php?q=gallery"; part of t
Ken Kixmoeller.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
I know how to test for the existance of HTTPS, and stuff like that.
So: Can one test https on a local machine? Resources, anyone? I have
Googled my fingers off.
Why not just generate a free
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
I know how to test for the existance of HTTPS, and stuff like that.
So: Can one test https on a local machine? Resources, anyone? I
have Googled my fingers off.
Why not just generate a free self-signed certificate fo
Ken Kixmoeller wrote:
Hi - - - - --
I have a typical setup -- my development machine, a testing server and,
of course, the production server. My development machine, of course,
doesn't have a Secure certificate, yet I need to be able to test https
pages here, before getting to the testi
On Mon, October 10, 2005 12:31 pm, zzapper wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:27:05 +0100, wrote:
>
>>On 10/10/05, zzapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Image that there could be a string
>>>
>>> fred
>>> Fred
>>> FRED
>>>
>>> First of all I need to know that these are same which I can d
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:27:05 +0100, wrote:
>On 10/10/05, zzapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Image that there could be a string
>>
>> fred
>> Fred
>> FRED
>>
>> First of all I need to know that these are same which I can do with
>> strtolower, but how could I tell
>> that 'FRED' is '
Hi,
You can check if browser cookies are enabled or not by using follow. given
JavaScript functions.
//** jsfunc.js ***//
function f_ReadCookie(cookieName)
{
if (cookieName == "" )
{
return;
}
var theCookie=""+document.cookie+(("/") ? "; path=" + "/" : "") ;
v
d starting point for setting cookies: if
you haven't read the manual, it migh be helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Aidan Lister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jun 21, 2004 5:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: Testing if cookies are enabled
Think about it.
Step 1) Analyse
* Thus wrote Martin Schneider:
>
> But I have seen pages on which it seems they set und check if the cookie
> has been set ON THE SAME PAGE. So I want to know how they do that
> (perhaps with a 302-header or something like that?).
I think you answered you're own question :)
if(! isset($_COOKIE
On 21 June 2004 12:11, Martin Schneider wrote:
> thanks for your reply, I think you missunderstood, please read more
> carefully. I know how to set and read a cookie, but as I
> wrote I wasn't
> able to set and text a cookie ON THE SAME PAGE.
>
> The manual says: http://php.net/setcookie
> "Once
Hi Aidan,
> Think about it.
>
> Step 1) Analyse the problem.
> a) Set a cookie.
> b) Test if the cookie has been set.
> c) Display data from cookie
>
> Step 2) Read the fucking manual
> a) http://php.net/setcookie
> b) http://php.net/setcookie
> c) http://php.net/setcookie
thanks for your reply, I
Think about it.
Step 1) Analyse the problem.
a) Set a cookie.
b) Test if the cookie has been set.
c) Display data from cookie
Step 2) Read the fucking manual
a) http://php.net/setcookie
b) http://php.net/setcookie
c) http://php.net/setcookie
If you can't work it out, and have actually done some
Ben Ramsey wrote:
You can download the PEAR packages yourself, though, drop them into a
directory in your site (or outside the root of your site), and use
ini_set() to set your include_path to the directory where your PEAR
classes reside. Then you can use PEAR without having to "install" it.
David Jackson wrote:
How can I test to see if and what portions of Pear are installed on a
vhosted website?
TX,
david
I'm not sure how to tell what portions are installed, exactly, but you
can test to see whether PEAR itself is installed simply by using
require 'PEAR.php';
If it complains, the
"Ian Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi
> I'm trying to build a validator in PHP, to check that XML documents are
> well-formed.
As a starting point I'd check out the excellent, open-source PEAR modules
available for XML manipulation at
http://pear.php.net/p
Data from POST is a hash table of strings, so you should use this to check
for zero:
if ($_POST['field'] == "0")
// Zero was entered
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Kyle Gibson wrote:
> > I have an array $keywords, how do I test to see if it is empty?
> > $keywords == '' seems to throw out an error.
>
> Maybe...
>
> if(count($keywords) <= 0)
> {
> //...
> }
I use sizeof(), which apparently is an alias to count(), and it works
f
I have an array $keywords, how do I test to see if it is empty? $keywords == '' seems to throw out an error.
Maybe...
if(count($keywords) <= 0)
{
//...
}
--
Kyle Gibson
admin(at)frozenonline.com
http://www.frozenonline.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
test ok!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction
>
> However, just have a few other questions:-
>
> Do i need to install apache if i use the windows self extracting version?
I assume you are talking about php self extracting? If so, you
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction
However, just have a few other questions:-
Do i need to install apache if i use the windows self extracting version?
Can all this be also done on a laptop?
Thanks for all the advice
Craig
"Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Robert,
maybe your variable doesn't exist. Try using
if(!isset($variable)) {
missing-message }
else {
show $variable }
I hope this helps.
Bye, Marcel
--
registered Fli4l-User #0388
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.p
if (ereg("^[[:blank:]]*$",$img_url)) {
// $img_url is blank
}
--
Julio Nobrega.
Um dia eu chego lá:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/toca
Ajudei? Salvei? Que tal um presentinho?
http://www.submarino.com.br/wishlistclient.asp?wlid=664176742884
"Robert McPeak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in m
Hello,
Justin French wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a simple method for checking if cookies are enabled (able to be
> set) on a browser? The only method I can think of is setting the
> cookie, then refreshing the page (or going to another URL) in order to
> tet if the cookie exists... which sound
[This mail goes out to php-dev, php-qa and php-general and
has its Reply-To: set to php-dev!]
Hi Zak,
thanks for the mail, I was thinking about writing such a mail
myself but was to tired I guess.
Yep, the CVS note to the latest ext/domxml changes state it
clearly:
Save the queries on different files, one for each query. Then make a
script that will read all these files and execute the queries, maybe run it
as a cron job, and delete the succesful ones . With several files will be
easier to spot an error if occur, just open it and see the query.
Okay, it
If I understand the question correctly - came late to the thread - I
think the easiest way to do this would be to check for the presence of
"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Testing for the presence of
Unfortunately, I also have users entering complex HTML code such as tables;
which, if each tag of a table is on a separate line, renders badly with
nl2br(). I mean, really badly. You have no idea.
My users range from professional web developers to people who are still
frightened by the idea
This may not actually be a problem. If you are expecting that users may
enter links as html you can still use nl2br and get a decent result. The
only time this would be a problem, would be if the users actually entered
as they filled in the form. In my experience, it is highly unlikely
that a
> Is there a method to test if Scripting has been disabled in the browser?
Sure.
Use JavaScript to forward to another page, or set a variable, or something,
and check it on the next page.
Either JavaScript worked, or it didn't.
There is *NO* way, a priori, to tell for the first page though.
-
46 matches
Mail list logo
