Re: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

2004-04-25 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, On 04/25/2004 06:03 PM, Jason Sheets wrote: Take a look at the Mail Queue class from PEAR, it enables you to put mail in the Queue instead of real time delivery. http://pear.php.net/packages.php?catpid=14&catname=Mail This is a bit of an overkill as it attempts to provide an inefficient so

RE: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

2004-04-25 Thread Jason Sheets
M To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability Manuel Lemos wrote: > Hello, > > On 04/25/2004 04:18 PM, Josh Klobe wrote: > >> Using mail($to, $subject, $content, $headers) takes way too long >> when attempting to mail to 30k people. This seems to

Re: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

2004-04-25 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, On 04/25/2004 05:43 PM, Travis Low wrote: Using mail($to, $subject, $content, $headers) takes way too long when attempting to mail to 30k people. This seems to be a result of a socket being opened for each send. Is there a better way to approach this situation via php? Under Unix/Linux

Re: [PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

2004-04-25 Thread Travis Low
Manuel Lemos wrote: Hello, On 04/25/2004 04:18 PM, Josh Klobe wrote: Using mail($to, $subject, $content, $headers) takes way too long when attempting to mail to 30k people. This seems to be a result of a socket being opened for each send. Is there a better way to approach this situation via ph

[PHP] Re: php mail() scaleability

2004-04-25 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, On 04/25/2004 04:18 PM, Josh Klobe wrote: Using mail($to, $subject, $content, $headers) takes way too long when attempting to mail to 30k people. This seems to be a result of a socket being opened for each send. Is there a better way to approach this situation via php? Under Unix/Linux,