Hi!
Job Miller wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>yes, thank you though.
>not in MyISAM tables, which is what mine are, and
>again according the manual, you slow things down
>significantly for transaction support.
Transactional InnoDB tables are actually faster in many
simple benchmarks t
yes, thank you though.
not in MyISAM tables, which is what mine are, and
again according the manual, you slow things down
significantly for transaction support.
is it worth it? instead of my previously suggested
method of handling it? or is there something better?
--- CC Zona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Job Miller) wrote:
> without save points and rollback what is the best way
> to replace all records for a user that might have been
> edited with their new values.
To clarify: are you aware that MySQL does have transaction support
available, o
3 matches
Mail list logo
