On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 07:54, Martin Marques wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 17:09, John Nichel wrote:
> >> Adam Zey wrote:
> >>
> >>> Note that just because the fact that it works is a feature, doesn't mean
> >>> it's good coding style. register gl
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 17:09, John Nichel wrote:
Adam Zey wrote:
Note that just because the fact that it works is a feature, doesn't mean
it's good coding style. register globals is a feature too, but it isn't
exactly a good idea to use it.
Ding d
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 16:50, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 17:09, John Nichel wrote:
> Adam Zey wrote:
>
> > Note that just because the fact that it works is a feature, doesn't mean
> > it's good coding style. register globals is a feature too, but it isn't
> > exactly a good idea to use it.
> >
>
> Ding ding ding
>
> Give that
Martin Marques wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Adam Zey wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I don't understand - the links point to posts by Rasmus saying that's
'beneficial' - seems to me to be a fairly robust endorsement yet you
consider leaving off trailing '?>' wrong (and use Ra
Adam Zey wrote:
Note that just because the fact that it works is a feature, doesn't mean
it's good coding style. register globals is a feature too, but it isn't
exactly a good idea to use it.
Ding ding ding
Give that man a cigar.
--
John C. Nichel IV
Programmer/System Admin (ÜberGeek)
Dot
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 16:53, Adam Zey wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
> > I don't understand - the links point to posts by Rasmus saying that's
> > 'beneficial' - seems to me to be a fairly robust endorsement yet you
> > consider leaving off trailing '?>' wrong (and use Rasmus' comments to
> > back tha
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Adam Zey wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I don't understand - the links point to posts by Rasmus saying that's
'beneficial' - seems to me to be a fairly robust endorsement yet you
consider leaving off trailing '?>' wrong (and use Rasmus' comments to
back
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
> Now, my question is: Is it a bad practice to "NOT" c
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 16:50, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
> Martin Marques wrote:
>
Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
Martin Marques wrote:
> Now, my question is: Is it
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Stephen Lake wrote:
As far as getting the header error resolved, try this:
http://ca3.php.net/manual/en/function.ob-start.php
I'll stick with not closing my scripts, just like Rasmus said. :-)
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
--
As far as getting the header error resolved, try this:
http://ca3.php.net/manual/en/function.ob-start.php
HTH
Steve
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cumm
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:15, Martin Marques wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
> >> Martin Marques wrote:
> >> > Now, my question is: Is it a bad practice to "NOT" close the script
> >> with
> >>
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:06:10 -0400, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
>> Martin Marques wrote:
>> > Now, my question is: Is it a bad practice to "NOT" close the script
>> with
>> > the PHP closing "?>"? I mean, just leave the script without
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 12:12, Adam Zey wrote:
> Martin Marques wrote:
> > Now, my question is: Is it a bad practice to "NOT" close the script
> with
> > the PHP closing "?>"? I mean, just leave the script without a closing
> > PHP simbols, as this scripts are included?
>
> Yes.
Wrong :)
Cheer
Hi:
So is the consensuses here to NOT close the "?>" tag?
tedd
--
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
Martin Marques wrote:
> Now, my question is: Is it a bad practice to "NOT" close the script
with
the PHP closing "?>"? I mean, just leave the script without a closing
PHP simbols, as this scripts are included?
Yes.
Regards, Adam.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscr
18 matches
Mail list logo
