Rasmus,
I see much better performance with Apache 2. I'm not an expert in the
internals of Apache nor PHP but I guess one of the improvements in
apache is the log mechanism, I think it use a different technique that
makes it faster that Apache 1.3
The reason I say this is because Apache 1.3 log
My experience dictates the contrary.
Apache 2 is much faster with PHP that Apache 1.3. I run an enterprise
web application in my company with about 950 users concurrently. I
configured the apache logs to add the execution time for each request
(this is done with %T in the LogFormat). We started
* Sebastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am undecided whether to upgrade to apache 2 (currently running 1.3.33)
> I've heard some bad stuff (some good maybe) about using apache 2 with php..
> does anyone have an opinions?
>
> I know everything has cons/pros but i am just looking for advice on whether
>
Lester Caine wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
I know everything has cons/pros but i am just looking for advice on
whether
my site will benifit from the upgrade. I'm curious to know if a site that
normally sees 300-500 users online would see any improvements.
That would be nice information to find out, but
Sebastian wrote:
I am undecided whether to upgrade to apache 2 (currently running 1.3.33)
I've heard some bad stuff (some good maybe) about using apache 2 with php..
does anyone have an opinions?
General opinion is if Apache1 is working stick with it. I'm using
Apache2 and never installed Apache1
5 matches
Mail list logo
