Hello,
On 06/16/2003 07:20 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I guess they can't compare with what they can't afford to buy.
It's therefore nice that it's available for free 21-day evaluation on
zend.com, isn't it? :)
I suppose that was not available when they started making those
benchmarks.
It was,
At 20:09 15/06/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
On 06/15/2003 12:39 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 13:59 11/06/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
I guess they can't compare with what they can't afford to buy.
It's therefore nice that it's available for free 21-day evaluation on
zend.com, isn't it? :)
I suppo
Hello,
On 06/15/2003 12:39 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 13:59 11/06/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
I guess they can't compare with what they can't afford to buy.
It's therefore nice that it's available for free 21-day evaluation on
zend.com, isn't it? :)
I suppose that was not available when they sta
At 13:59 11/06/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
I guess they can't compare with what they can't afford to buy.
It's therefore nice that it's available for free 21-day evaluation on
zend.com, isn't it? :)
Anyway, it does not seem to make much sense to compare code acceleration
based on plain caching/opt
Hello,
On 06/11/2003 06:08 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:27 09/05/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Have you been on vacation or just working really hard to beat Turck? :-)
I've been using the Turck MM Cache for 3 months now and the
performance is amazing :)
Yes, their benchmarks show that it pratical
At 16:27 09/05/2003, Manuel Lemos wrote:
I've been using the Turck MM Cache for 3 months now and the performance
is amazing :)
Yes, their benchmarks show that it pratically matches Zend products
performance, thus beating all the others.
Except they only compare it to the entry-level product from
6 matches
Mail list logo
