"tedd" wrote in message
news:p06240801c5aa0ed7d...@[192.168.1.101]...
> At 4:16 PM +0100 1/30/09, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>tedd schreef:
>>> At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>"
yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
will
At 4:16 PM +0100 1/30/09, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd schreef:
At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>"
yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
will
work. It's not technically correct, but it does work.
There you go again. What's technically corr
tedd schreef:
> At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>> >"
>>
>> yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it
>> will
>> work. It's not technically correct, but it does work.
>
> There you go again. What's technically correct?
hiya tedd,
you mean to ask "n
At 4:43 PM -0500 1/29/09, Frank Stanovcak wrote:
>"
yes...that is legal. as long as the statment resolves to a boolean it will
work. It's not technically correct, but it does work.
There you go again. What's technically correct?
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancient
>"Alice Wei" wrote in message
>news:snt101-w587cd616331fc59b84834af0...@phx.gbl...
>
>Hi,
>
> I have a code snippet here as in the following:
>
>//Switch statements between the four options
>switch($string) {
>case "":
>$string= "NOT book.author='All'";
>break;
>default:
>$string= $string . "AN
5 matches
Mail list logo
