On 7/8/10, Nisse Engström wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:15:02 +0200, "Gary ." wrote:
>> I'm guessing that those attributes "must" be quoted in XML and
>> "should" be in HTML (but patently aren't)?
>
> For that attribute value, it's a "must" in both cases.
Okay. Please tell L**! :)
--
PHP Ge
On 7/8/10, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 8 July 2010 16:15, Gary wrote:
>> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
>> be that the body tag looks like
>>
>> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
>> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:15:02 +0200, "Gary ." wrote:
> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
> be that the body tag looks like
>
> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
>
> I'm guessing that
On 8 July 2010 16:15, Gary . wrote:
> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
> be that the body tag looks like
>
> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
>
> I'm guessing that those attributes
Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
be that the body tag looks like
and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
I'm guessing that those attributes "must" be quoted in XML and
"should" be in HTML (
AChris W schreef:
I have the following xmlwith standard tags changed to [ and ] to
prevent mail clients from encoding it as html.
[?xml version="1.0"?]
[resultset errors="0" results="86"]
[result id="20080922133104871678" lastinspected="9/29/2009
0:00"]0.4[/result]
[result id="2008092213310
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0.xsd" >
bar.com
foo.com
XML;
$sxe = simplexml_load_string($xml);
/** Just try to match any cd node we can find */
var_dump($sxe->xpath('//cd'
7 matches
Mail list logo
