Am 2006-05-15 17:25:05, schrieb Rory Browne:
> Bullshit. there are multiple tools for copying files from host to host,
> including ftp, scp, sftp, rsync, nfs, etc. Planning ahead, is a better way
> to avoid breaking links than using MySQL to store your images.
Right, currently I am using a php5
On Mon, May 15, 2006 10:18 am, tedd wrote:
> crash
It DOES make a difference as to how fast you can restore the DB and
the images, and more importantly, the PERCEIVED time for your site to
be "back up"
If you can get your DB up fast, but the images aren't available, MOST
sites, other than, like,
Plus, a dB has search capabilities that a file system doesn't --
that's probably the reason why dB's came into existence, right?
Last time I checked we had tools to search the filesystem. locate,
find and awk spring to mind.
So, you are claiming that those file-system tools match all the
func
On 5/15/06, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 12:18 AM +0200 5/14/06, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Am 2006-05-12 09:28:36, schrieb tedd:
>
>> But, at some point (and I forgot to mention this in my previous post)
>> all programmers start thinking in collections of data and a dB
>> becomes a well
At 12:18 AM +0200 5/14/06, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-05-12 09:28:36, schrieb tedd:
But, at some point (and I forgot to mention this in my previous post)
all programmers start thinking in collections of data and a dB
becomes a well suited solution (record holder and organizer) for
that
At 12:18 AM +0200 5/14/06, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-05-12 09:28:36, schrieb tedd:
But, at some point (and I forgot to mention this in my previous post)
all programmers start thinking in collections of data and a dB
becomes a well suited solution (record holder and organizer) for
that
Hi Rory
Am 2006-05-10 23:05:07, schrieb Rory Browne:
> you can say newbie as well. As a newbie I thought myself that storing images
> in a DB would be a nice clean solution. Voices of experience said otherwise.
> Over the years as I grew more experienced I began to understand myself, why
> puttin
Am 2006-05-12 09:28:36, schrieb tedd:
> But, at some point (and I forgot to mention this in my previous post)
> all programmers start thinking in collections of data and a dB
> becomes a well suited solution (record holder and organizer) for
> that. As such, all data connected to a record, incl
Am 2006-05-11 13:40:34, schrieb tedd:
> Plus, moving images from one system to another
> was much easier because you just moved the dB and
> you don't have to worry about the file system and
> breaking links.
This can be done from a script to...
> In addition, if you are using multiple hosts,
9 matches
Mail list logo
