tedd wrote:
At 3:09 PM -0500 8/13/09, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ralph Deffke wrote:
for those of u not being a physician
semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build fast
At 3:09 PM -0500 8/13/09, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Ralph Deffke wrote:
for those of u not being a physician
semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build faster computers
[snip]. Cryptic crap does
> not mean that you're a clever programmer, it only shows that you don't know
> any better.
[/snip]
I know people like this
--
Bastien
Cat, the other other white meat
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.
Ralph Deffke wrote:
> for those of u not being a physician
>
> semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
> the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build faster computers this matters.
>
> many physicians believe that
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> for those of u not being a physician
>
> semiconductors are of pretty big atoms, but this is not the main problem,
> the problem is that u have to cut out structures off these semiconductors
> in order to build faster computers this matters.
endless
ralph_def...@yahoo.de
Von: Jay Blanchard
An: Ralph Deffke ; php-general@lists.php.net
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 13. August 2009, 20:15:31 Uhr
Betreff: RE: [PHP] Re: Re: Re: Design Patterns
[snip]
u can not go smaler then an atom.
[/snip]
Neutrons, electrons
At 12:32 PM -0400 8/13/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
With respect to why you see "shortening of code and cutting out
comments", perhaps you are referring to the recent Calendar thread,
where a bunch of us were just having some good old optimization fun.
I for one enjoy the occasional diversion of
Ralph Deffke wrote:
but what Im asking is that the reality?
go and talk to accountant and tell them after spending soansomuch for the
new site hes has to buy a new server ! what will acountant say, what u
think.
another more important point is in reality u take a project on on a specific
hardwa
[snip]
u can not go smaler then an atom.
[/snip]
Neutrons, electrons, gluons, protons particles all smaller than an
atom. There are others if you want to get into a discussion of quantum
physics and mechanics, but we should probably take that discussion
offline.
Many folks here are building
Greg I completly aggree, but dont miss the point that I'M adigted to OOP
WHY NOT A FRAMEWORK CLOSER TO THE REAL POINT CALLED DOM
design pattern for HTML XHTML XML SVG Database conection and retrieving.
WHY CLASSES FOR CALLERS AND RECEIVERS AND INTERPRETERS.
a is it a caller? a receiver?
why t
but what Im asking is that the reality?
go and talk to accountant and tell them after spending soansomuch for the
new site hes has to buy a new server ! what will acountant say, what u
think.
another more important point is in reality u take a project on on a specific
hardware base. lets say it a
Robert Cummings wrote:
>
>
> Martin Zvarík wrote:
>> Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
>>> NO NO NO
>>>
>>> OOP is the best ever inventet !
>>>
>>> see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
>>> opensource OMS very soon.
>>>
>>> I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this o
Martin Zvarík wrote:
Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of
Ralph Deffke wrote:
funny then that I see here serious people discussing the benefit of
shortening code and cutting out commends.
maby thats a general problem of our society that everybody think higher
cheaper faster. this will have a limit guys !!! u can not go smaler then an
atom.
funny as
Ralph Deffke napsal(a):
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of customers asking for a
NO NO NO
OOP is the best ever inventet !
see my comments on this list, I will also come up with an pure oop
opensource OMS very soon.
I just think a dam big pattern catalog like this one is like an elephant
chacing mice. I mean I can think of customers asking for a documentation of
course of
I use a combination of procedural and OOP for my scripts. Mainly
because I have a lot of old code I wrote before I understood OOP. Now
that I do it makes my life so much easier because of the
organizational and reusability benefits. In today's world I will
gladly trade a little overhead
funny then that I see here serious people discussing the benefit of
shortening code and cutting out commends.
maby thats a general problem of our society that everybody think higher
cheaper faster. this will have a limit guys !!! u can not go smaler then an
atom.
funny as well that I make my main
Hi Ralph,
Sorry, I haven't understand your question.
Do you think OOP isn't usefull for PHP? The PHP
task is just to output a text file but the process might involve
a lot of work: database access, communication with web services, etc.
Do you think duplicate code is better than use more memory?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> Thanks Jaime,
>
> very nice, but I'm a programmer since 1982 and into OOP since 1988 with the
> outcome if IBM's C++ compiler on the OS2 platform.
>
> Don't u think it could be reasonable to ask if such an overhead IN PHP is
> necessary?
>
>
Thanks Jaime,
very nice, but I'm a programmer since 1982 and into OOP since 1988 with the
outcome if IBM's C++ compiler on the OS2 platform.
Don't u think it could be reasonable to ask if such an overhead IN PHP is
necessary?
does anybody agree that PHP might be the wrong language to accomplish
Hi Ralph.
If u want to understand the Martin's job u need to read about
design patterns. A good place to start? Wikipedia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns).
The use of Design patterns is an advanced programming method.
It helps us to improve our object oriented programation.
I hope
22 matches
Mail list logo
