Re: [PHP] Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail

2005-11-29 Thread Curt Zirzow
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:59:55PM -0800, Max Schwanekamp wrote: > Richard Heyes wrote: > >Petr Smith wrote: > >>I tried all and ended with > >>http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html > >>fast, stable, usable. > >A very good choice. ;-) > > But but but, what *is* the advantage of one ove

Re: [PHP] Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail

2005-11-29 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, on 11/29/2005 10:59 PM Max Schwanekamp said the following: Richard Heyes wrote: Petr Smith wrote: I tried all and ended with http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html fast, stable, usable. A very good choice. ;-) But but but, what *is* the advantage of one over the other? I'

Re: [PHP] Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail

2005-11-29 Thread Max Schwanekamp
Richard Heyes wrote: Petr Smith wrote: I tried all and ended with http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html fast, stable, usable. A very good choice. ;-) But but but, what *is* the advantage of one over the other? I've been a PhpMailer devotee for some time. PEAR::Mail is too spare

Re: [PHP] Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail

2005-11-29 Thread Richard Heyes
Petr Smith wrote: Cabbar Duzayak wrote: Could you please tell which one you recommend in terms of stability/speed and share your experience in terms of these 2? Thanks... I tried all and ended with http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html fast, stable, usable. A very good choice.

[PHP] Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail

2005-11-28 Thread Petr Smith
Cabbar Duzayak wrote: Could you please tell which one you recommend in terms of stability/speed and share your experience in terms of these 2? Thanks... I tried all and ended with http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html fast, stable, usable. Petr -- PHP General Mailing List (http: