On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 17:25, Lists wrote:
>
> Most definitely, as I stated (or alluded to) in a previous post.
Absolutely. There was nothing malicious intended by my comment
with your particular post. With some folks who come around trolling
threads to tout their sites and services, yes, b
oh, yep, it's back! :]
On Jun 1, 2009 7:50pm, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 17:44, Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Completely off topic, but www.pilotpig.net is down or buggered or
> something! Looks like a squatter to me >.>
Looks fine to me, but you may
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 17:44, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
>
> Completely off topic, but www.pilotpig.net is down or buggered or
> something! Looks like a squatter to me >.>
Looks fine to me, but you may have caught it while I was swapping
over some junk with GoDaddy. They're not as seamless as the
>
>
> daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
> http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
> 50% Off All Shared Hosting Plans at PilotPig: Use Coupon DOW1
>
>
Completely off topic, but www.pilotpig.net is down or buggered or
something! Looks like a squatter to me >.>
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 17:08, Lists wrote:
I usually prefer a language called WebDNA [...]
[snip!]
--
=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o
D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center
WebDNA Software Corp.
I could
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 17:08, Lists wrote:
>
> I usually prefer a language called WebDNA [...]
[snip!]
>
> --
> =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o
> D. BROOKE EUCA Design Center
> WebDNA Software Corp.
I could be way off-b
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Lists wrote:
ASP (Classic) and ASP.NET = two different things.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages
Personally, I don't see a reason for putting anyone, or any
company through the torture of building web apps with
.NET. ...VBSCRIPT for the
That would be about it, unless you need a fancy GUI with all the bells
and whistles
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 1, 2009, at 15:35, Tom Worster wrote:
assuming one had suitable hardware, what does it cost to start
developing
for asp? i guess you'd need to buy a copy of some windows se
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Lists wrote:
> ASP (Classic) and ASP.NET = two different things.
>
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages
>
> Personally, I don't see a reason for putting anyone, or any
> company through the torture of building web apps with
> .NET. ...VBSCRIPT for the web jus
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> assuming one had suitable hardware, what does it cost to start developing
> for asp? i guess you'd need to buy a copy of some windows server for dev
> test. what else?
That's about it. ASP/ASP.NET both come with Windows if you install
IIS. Wher
assuming one had suitable hardware, what does it cost to start developing
for asp? i guess you'd need to buy a copy of some windows server for dev
test. what else?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Lists wrote:
> ASP (Classic) and ASP.NET = two different things.
>
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages
Agreed. And neither one of them is a language.
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
ASP (Classic) and ASP.NET = two different things.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Server_Pages
Personally, I don't see a reason for putting anyone, or any
company through the torture of building web apps with
.NET. ...VBSCRIPT for the web just doesn't make sense to
me with the other solutions that
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Dee Ayy wrote:
>> ASP.NET is not a language. It is more like a framework that can run
>> multiple languages. It can run VB.NET, C# and even PHP (although it is
>> not usual).
>
> I'm going to shoot from a (90's?) hip on this one.
>
> Isn't ".NET" the framework, and
> ASP.NET is not a language. It is more like a framework that can run
> multiple languages. It can run VB.NET, C# and even PHP (although it is
> not usual).
I'm going to shoot from a (90's?) hip on this one.
Isn't ".NET" the framework, and ".NET" the language?
ASP.NET uses ASP to access the .NET
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 05/28/2009 10:20 AM Olexandr Heneralov said the following:
>> Hi!
>> Guys, you of course, know that ASP.NET becomes more and more popular in the
>> world.
>> I have a question for everyone:
>> Can it happen so that PHP will be r
Hello,
on 05/28/2009 10:20 AM Olexandr Heneralov said the following:
> Hi!
> Guys, you of course, know that ASP.NET becomes more and more popular in the
> world.
> I have a question for everyone:
> Can it happen so that PHP will be replaced with ASP.NET?
ASP.NET is not a language. It is more lik
17 matches
Mail list logo
