5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP
I haven't got around to reading all the other replies yet, so this reply
might already be covered...
So I went to that url - and okay, according to the person writing that
page,
there's a ~3sec increase in the time it ta
ght matter greatly... its all
situational.
-Original Message-
From: Demitrious S. Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:04 PM
To: 'SP'; 'Remy Dufour'; 'Kondwani Spike Mkandawire';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OO
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:50 PM
To: Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP
OO is slower then procedural. You can test that out yourself or look at
this article where the guy did a very basic test. Maybe they will fix the
speed problem
ROC:
PHP Version: 4.1.2 Took 69.567726969719 seconds
PHP Version: 4.2.1 Took 86.658290982246 seconds
-Original Message-
From: SP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Remy Dufour; Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re:
PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 27, 2002 1:34 PM
To: SP; Kondwani Spike Mkandawire; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP
I've tested thecode and there is what i've got
Proceduraltook 1.24408602715 seconds
OOtook 1.24240803719 seconds
Here is the code. Test it by yourself
t
;Remy Dufour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kondwani Spike Mkandawire"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP
> I've tested thecode and there is
I've tested thecode and there is what i've got
Proceduraltook 1.24408602715 seconds
OOtook 1.24240803719 seconds
Here is the code. Test it by yourself
took ". (getmicrotime() - $time_start) ." seconds";
class count {function icount($vs) {$var=0;
while($count < $vs) {
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 08:10 AM, Kondwani Spike Mkandawire
wrote:
> I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about
> I do agree that it is stylistic hence helps someone else who
> hasn't written your code to follow up on what you are doing...
> But so far the programs I
Spike Mkandawire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 27, 2002 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP and OOP
I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about
I do agree that it is stylistic hence helps someone else who
hasn't written your code to follow up o
[snip]
I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about ...How many
of us have done so? Could some one please point out another feasible
advantage of OO programming a part from the fact that I would make someone
else's work easier by using this style of programming...
[/snip]
It's
I still don't get what the big fuss of OO programming is about
I do agree that it is stylistic hence helps someone else who
hasn't written your code to follow up on what you are doing...
But so far the programs I have been writing in OO supported
languages have been written and scripted on an "as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i want to build a site in fully OO style but that will
> significantly slow down execution time
Do you have any documentation on this? - I'm getting quite used to read
and hear the very opposite.
Previously programmers even argued that asp was faster than php because
12 matches
Mail list logo
