Re: [PHP] Re: PHP RFC # 0001 --- List Etiquette

2007-11-28 Thread Per Jessen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wouldn't this be solved if the email is simply an answer to the thread > instead of a new, separate email? Yes it would. Any other suggestion (to fix the same) will most likely fail when the user cannot even work out how to reply properly. IMHO. /Per Jessen, Züric

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP RFC # 0001 --- List Etiquette

2007-11-28 Thread Stephen Johnson
> From: Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:37:10 -0500 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP RFC # 0001 --- List Etiquette > > > Further, I think Jason Pruim's suggestion of adding to the welcome &g

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP RFC # 0001 --- List Etiquette

2007-11-28 Thread Daniel Brown
On Nov 28, 2007 11:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't this be solved if the email is simply an answer to the thread > instead of a new, separate email? Within the thread about nested files > (http://www.nabble.com/Nested-include-require-not-working-in-5.2-tf4882937.html) > there was also

[PHP] Re: PHP RFC # 0001 --- List Etiquette

2007-11-28 Thread news_yodpeirs
Wouldn't this be solved if the email is simply an answer to the thread instead of a new, separate email? Within the thread about nested files (http://www.nabble.com/Nested-include-require-not-working-in-5.2-tf4882937.html) there was also an email with a changed subject ("(SOLVED)" was added), bu